Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review
The art of planting, preparing, and distributing food around urban areas is known as urban agriculture, farming, or gardening. Individuals and organizations generally work in urban agriculture for general purposes: 1) enhancing their own health and economic circumstances; 2) improving their communit...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2021
|
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97145/1/ABSTRACT.pdf |
| _version_ | 1825937819343781888 |
|---|---|
| author | Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira Man, Norsida Mohamed Haris, Nur Bahiah Ismail, Ismi Arif Maruf, Amar |
| author_facet | Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira Man, Norsida Mohamed Haris, Nur Bahiah Ismail, Ismi Arif Maruf, Amar |
| author_sort | Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira |
| collection | UPM |
| description | The art of planting, preparing, and distributing food around urban areas is known as urban agriculture, farming, or gardening. Individuals and organizations generally work in urban agriculture for general purposes: 1) enhancing their own health and economic circumstances; 2) improving their communities’ access to nutritious food; 3) enhancing their community wellbeing; and 4) developing a community and ecosystem. The Urban Agriculture Program (UAP) has been set up by the Department of Agriculture (DOA) Malaysia since 2014 to facilitate and transfer information regarding urban farming practices to the community. However, the program was less effective and had a low success rate due to the local community's minimal participation, slow development, and sustainability of the agriculture community gardens. This article primarily examines the UAP implementation based on the four components of the CIPP Evaluation Model: Context, Input, Process, and Product. The UAP is a sustainable development tool that can provide food or related services within or on the edges of urban areas. Malaysia addresses food security by providing urban dwellers with adequate nutritious, safe, acceptable, and cost-effective food. Therefore, the study is relevant as achieving food security and nutrition that has been set in the urban agriculture program outcome by 2025. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T11:05:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | upm.eprints-97145 |
| institution | Universiti Putra Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T11:05:19Z |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | upm.eprints-971452022-09-13T09:05:39Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97145/ Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira Man, Norsida Mohamed Haris, Nur Bahiah Ismail, Ismi Arif Maruf, Amar The art of planting, preparing, and distributing food around urban areas is known as urban agriculture, farming, or gardening. Individuals and organizations generally work in urban agriculture for general purposes: 1) enhancing their own health and economic circumstances; 2) improving their communities’ access to nutritious food; 3) enhancing their community wellbeing; and 4) developing a community and ecosystem. The Urban Agriculture Program (UAP) has been set up by the Department of Agriculture (DOA) Malaysia since 2014 to facilitate and transfer information regarding urban farming practices to the community. However, the program was less effective and had a low success rate due to the local community's minimal participation, slow development, and sustainability of the agriculture community gardens. This article primarily examines the UAP implementation based on the four components of the CIPP Evaluation Model: Context, Input, Process, and Product. The UAP is a sustainable development tool that can provide food or related services within or on the edges of urban areas. Malaysia addresses food security by providing urban dwellers with adequate nutritious, safe, acceptable, and cost-effective food. Therefore, the study is relevant as achieving food security and nutrition that has been set in the urban agriculture program outcome by 2025. EDP Sciences 2021 Article PeerReviewed text en http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97145/1/ABSTRACT.pdf Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira and Man, Norsida and Mohamed Haris, Nur Bahiah and Ismail, Ismi Arif and Maruf, Amar (2021) Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review. E3S Web of Conferences, 306. art. no. 03007. pp. 1-8. ISSN 2267-1242 https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles 10.1051/e3sconf/202130603007 |
| spellingShingle | Yusuf, Munifah Siti Amira Man, Norsida Mohamed Haris, Nur Bahiah Ismail, Ismi Arif Maruf, Amar Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title | Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title_full | Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title_fullStr | Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title_short | Evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using CIPP model: a review |
| title_sort | evaluating urban agriculture program effectiveness using cipp model a review |
| url | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/97145/1/ABSTRACT.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yusufmunifahsitiamira evaluatingurbanagricultureprogrameffectivenessusingcippmodelareview AT mannorsida evaluatingurbanagricultureprogrameffectivenessusingcippmodelareview AT mohamedharisnurbahiah evaluatingurbanagricultureprogrameffectivenessusingcippmodelareview AT ismailismiarif evaluatingurbanagricultureprogrameffectivenessusingcippmodelareview AT marufamar evaluatingurbanagricultureprogrameffectivenessusingcippmodelareview |