An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact Of Management Journals
Despite their limitations, journal rankings and impact data often form the basis of evaluations of research performance. Recent advances in citation analysis may facilitate the creation of journal rankings with broader coverage, particularly in terms of international coverage. This study explores...
| Auteurs principaux: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Langue: | English |
| Publié: |
Asian Academy of Management (AAM)
2013
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | http://eprints.usm.my/36602/1/art_3_%2837-54%29.pdf |
| _version_ | 1825833501715333120 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosenstreich, Daniela Wooliscroft, Ben |
| author_facet | Rosenstreich, Daniela Wooliscroft, Ben |
| author_sort | Rosenstreich, Daniela |
| collection | USM |
| description | Despite their limitations, journal rankings and impact data often form the basis of
evaluations of research performance. Recent advances in citation analysis may facilitate
the creation of journal rankings with broader coverage, particularly in terms of
international coverage. This study explores three sources of citation data: Web of
Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. It was found that Web of Science indexes
approximately one-fifth of all academic management titles and includes fewer citations
than Google Scholar. Six rankings of management journals were combined to produce a
list of 57 titles. Overall, the analysis of citation data in this study suggests that the gindex provides an improved mechanism for measuring the impact of journals. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T15:08:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | usm.eprints-36602 |
| institution | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T15:08:46Z |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publisher | Asian Academy of Management (AAM) |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | usm.eprints-366022017-09-19T02:05:39Z http://eprints.usm.my/36602/ An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact Of Management Journals Rosenstreich, Daniela Wooliscroft, Ben HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management Despite their limitations, journal rankings and impact data often form the basis of evaluations of research performance. Recent advances in citation analysis may facilitate the creation of journal rankings with broader coverage, particularly in terms of international coverage. This study explores three sources of citation data: Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar. It was found that Web of Science indexes approximately one-fifth of all academic management titles and includes fewer citations than Google Scholar. Six rankings of management journals were combined to produce a list of 57 titles. Overall, the analysis of citation data in this study suggests that the gindex provides an improved mechanism for measuring the impact of journals. Asian Academy of Management (AAM) 2013 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/36602/1/art_3_%2837-54%29.pdf Rosenstreich, Daniela and Wooliscroft, Ben (2013) An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact Of Management Journals. Asian Academy of Management Journal (AAMJ), 18 (2). pp. 1-18. ISSN 1394-2603 http://web.usm.my/aamj/18022013/art%203%20(37-54).pdf |
| spellingShingle | HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management Rosenstreich, Daniela Wooliscroft, Ben An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact Of Management Journals |
| title | An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact
Of Management Journals |
| title_full | An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact
Of Management Journals |
| title_fullStr | An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact
Of Management Journals |
| title_full_unstemmed | An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact
Of Management Journals |
| title_short | An Improved Method For Assessing The Impact
Of Management Journals |
| title_sort | improved method for assessing the impact of management journals |
| topic | HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management |
| url | http://eprints.usm.my/36602/1/art_3_%2837-54%29.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenstreichdaniela animprovedmethodforassessingtheimpactofmanagementjournals AT wooliscroftben animprovedmethodforassessingtheimpactofmanagementjournals AT rosenstreichdaniela improvedmethodforassessingtheimpactofmanagementjournals AT wooliscroftben improvedmethodforassessingtheimpactofmanagementjournals |