Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.

Introduction: All topical medications are known to cause conjunctival reactions, and topical antiglaucoma drugs are also no exception. Long term drug induced toxicity to the conjunctiva is postulated to cause filtering bleb scarring and filtration surgery failure. Chronic application of topical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan, Hoi, Tan Soon, Jaafar, Hasnan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/45533/1/GP...Dissertation%20Submitted%20In%20Partial%20Fulfillment%20For%20The%20Degree%20Of%20Master%20Of%20Medicine%20%28Ophthalmology%29...2004...-24%20pages.pdf
_version_ 1825835171719413760
author Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan
Hoi, Tan Soon
Jaafar, Hasnan
author_facet Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan
Hoi, Tan Soon
Jaafar, Hasnan
author_sort Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan
collection USM
description Introduction: All topical medications are known to cause conjunctival reactions, and topical antiglaucoma drugs are also no exception. Long term drug induced toxicity to the conjunctiva is postulated to cause filtering bleb scarring and filtration surgery failure. Chronic application of topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topical latanoprost 0.005% had been shown to alter the morphology of the conjunctival ocular surface. Objective: To compare conjunctival surface morphological changes with the use of the topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%. Methodology: Newly diagnosed glaucoma patients who met the selection criteria were randomly divided into two groups. One group treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5%, another group treated with topical latanoprost 0. 005%. Before the treatment was started, the first conjunctival impression cytology was taken. After three months of treatment, the second conjunctival impression cytology was obtained. The changes that occurred between thefrrst and second conjunctival impression cytology in the individual group were analyzed. Conjunctival surface changes that occurred with the use of topical timolol maleate 0.5% were also compared with the conjunctiva surface changes that occurred with the use of topicallatanoprost 0. 005%. Results: There were thirty-nine newly diagnosed glaucoma patients included in this study. Twenty patients were in the Timolol group and nineteen patients in the Latanoprost group. In both groups of patients, there was no change of the conjunctival epithelial cell morphology after three months of anti-glaucoma therapy. However, there was statistically significant reduction of the goblet cell and mucous granule density in both groups of patients after three months of the topical anti-glaucoma therapy (P- value <0.001). By using the independent T -test, there was no significant difference of the goblet cell and mucous granule density between the Timolol group and the Latanoprost group after three months of treatment. Conclusion: This concludes that both timolol maeate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005% cause great reduction of conjunctival goblet cells and mucous granules within three months of treatment. However, the conjunctival epithelial cell morphology remained normal after three month of treatment in both groups of patients. This study gives evidence that topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005% cause morphological changes ofthe conjunctival surface after short term (three months) therapy. However, there was nodifference in the conjunctival morphological changes between the Timolol group and Latanoprost group.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T15:33:44Z
format Article
id usm.eprints-45533
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T15:33:44Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling usm.eprints-455332019-09-24T08:22:22Z http://eprints.usm.my/45533/ Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%. Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan Hoi, Tan Soon Jaafar, Hasnan RE Ophthalmology Introduction: All topical medications are known to cause conjunctival reactions, and topical antiglaucoma drugs are also no exception. Long term drug induced toxicity to the conjunctiva is postulated to cause filtering bleb scarring and filtration surgery failure. Chronic application of topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topical latanoprost 0.005% had been shown to alter the morphology of the conjunctival ocular surface. Objective: To compare conjunctival surface morphological changes with the use of the topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%. Methodology: Newly diagnosed glaucoma patients who met the selection criteria were randomly divided into two groups. One group treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5%, another group treated with topical latanoprost 0. 005%. Before the treatment was started, the first conjunctival impression cytology was taken. After three months of treatment, the second conjunctival impression cytology was obtained. The changes that occurred between thefrrst and second conjunctival impression cytology in the individual group were analyzed. Conjunctival surface changes that occurred with the use of topical timolol maleate 0.5% were also compared with the conjunctiva surface changes that occurred with the use of topicallatanoprost 0. 005%. Results: There were thirty-nine newly diagnosed glaucoma patients included in this study. Twenty patients were in the Timolol group and nineteen patients in the Latanoprost group. In both groups of patients, there was no change of the conjunctival epithelial cell morphology after three months of anti-glaucoma therapy. However, there was statistically significant reduction of the goblet cell and mucous granule density in both groups of patients after three months of the topical anti-glaucoma therapy (P- value <0.001). By using the independent T -test, there was no significant difference of the goblet cell and mucous granule density between the Timolol group and the Latanoprost group after three months of treatment. Conclusion: This concludes that both timolol maeate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005% cause great reduction of conjunctival goblet cells and mucous granules within three months of treatment. However, the conjunctival epithelial cell morphology remained normal after three month of treatment in both groups of patients. This study gives evidence that topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005% cause morphological changes ofthe conjunctival surface after short term (three months) therapy. However, there was nodifference in the conjunctival morphological changes between the Timolol group and Latanoprost group. Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2004 Article NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/45533/1/GP...Dissertation%20Submitted%20In%20Partial%20Fulfillment%20For%20The%20Degree%20Of%20Master%20Of%20Medicine%20%28Ophthalmology%29...2004...-24%20pages.pdf Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan and Hoi, Tan Soon and Jaafar, Hasnan (2004) Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%. Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.. (Submitted)
spellingShingle RE Ophthalmology
Hitam, Wan Hazabbah Wan
Hoi, Tan Soon
Jaafar, Hasnan
Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title_full Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title_fullStr Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title_short Comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0.5% and topicallatanoprost 0.005%.
title_sort comparison of conjunctival impression cytology between glaucoma patients treated with topical timolol maleate 0 5 and topicallatanoprost 0 005
topic RE Ophthalmology
url http://eprints.usm.my/45533/1/GP...Dissertation%20Submitted%20In%20Partial%20Fulfillment%20For%20The%20Degree%20Of%20Master%20Of%20Medicine%20%28Ophthalmology%29...2004...-24%20pages.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hitamwanhazabbahwan comparisonofconjunctivalimpressioncytologybetweenglaucomapatientstreatedwithtopicaltimololmaleate05andtopicallatanoprost0005
AT hoitansoon comparisonofconjunctivalimpressioncytologybetweenglaucomapatientstreatedwithtopicaltimololmaleate05andtopicallatanoprost0005
AT jaafarhasnan comparisonofconjunctivalimpressioncytologybetweenglaucomapatientstreatedwithtopicaltimololmaleate05andtopicallatanoprost0005