Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate

The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie
Format: Monograph
Language:English
Published: Universiti Sains Malaysia 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf
_version_ 1797012823663968256
author Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie
author_facet Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie
author_sort Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie
collection USM
description The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEg- MA) as compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties of PBT/LDPE blends were investigated. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showed two phase morphology with poor interaction between the phases. Based on mechanical properties, 80PBT/20LDPE exhibited the highest tensile strength and modulus and it was considered as the optimum blend system. Incorporation of EMAGMA or PE-g-MA as compatibilizer in the 80PBT/20LDPE blend showed improvement in impact strength but reduction in tensile strength. However, 80PBT/20LDPE blend with EMAGMA have better mechanical properties compared with the blend with PE-g-MA, even though the mechanical properties lowered than uncompatibilized 80PBT/20LDPE blend. FESEM study indicated less phase separation suggesting better interaction between the components in PBT/LDPE/EMAGMA blends compared with the PBT/LDPE/PE-g-MA blends. In conclusion, EMAGMA is considered as a better compatibilizer compared with PE-g-MA, but it could not act as an effective compatibilizer for the PBT/LDPE blend system at low content.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T15:53:20Z
format Monograph
id usm.eprints-52472
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T15:53:20Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling usm.eprints-524722022-05-09T07:14:33Z http://eprints.usm.my/52472/ Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie T Technology TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEg- MA) as compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties of PBT/LDPE blends were investigated. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showed two phase morphology with poor interaction between the phases. Based on mechanical properties, 80PBT/20LDPE exhibited the highest tensile strength and modulus and it was considered as the optimum blend system. Incorporation of EMAGMA or PE-g-MA as compatibilizer in the 80PBT/20LDPE blend showed improvement in impact strength but reduction in tensile strength. However, 80PBT/20LDPE blend with EMAGMA have better mechanical properties compared with the blend with PE-g-MA, even though the mechanical properties lowered than uncompatibilized 80PBT/20LDPE blend. FESEM study indicated less phase separation suggesting better interaction between the components in PBT/LDPE/EMAGMA blends compared with the PBT/LDPE/PE-g-MA blends. In conclusion, EMAGMA is considered as a better compatibilizer compared with PE-g-MA, but it could not act as an effective compatibilizer for the PBT/LDPE blend system at low content. Universiti Sains Malaysia 2017-07-01 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie (2017) Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate. Project Report. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Bahan Sumber Mineral. (Submitted)
spellingShingle T Technology
TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials
Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie
Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title_full Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title_fullStr Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title_full_unstemmed Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title_short Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
title_sort effect of poly ethylene co methyl acrylate coglycidyl methacrylate
topic T Technology
TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials
url http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rosllynurulamiraizzatie effectofpolyethylenecomethylacrylatecoglycidylmethacrylate