Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate
The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and p...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Monograph |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universiti Sains Malaysia
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf |
_version_ | 1797012823663968256 |
---|---|
author | Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie |
author_facet | Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie |
author_sort | Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie |
collection | USM |
description | The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density
polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of
different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl
methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEg-
MA) as compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties of PBT/LDPE
blends were investigated. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showed
two phase morphology with poor interaction between the phases. Based on mechanical
properties, 80PBT/20LDPE exhibited the highest tensile strength and modulus and it was
considered as the optimum blend system. Incorporation of EMAGMA or PE-g-MA as
compatibilizer in the 80PBT/20LDPE blend showed improvement in impact strength but
reduction in tensile strength. However, 80PBT/20LDPE blend with EMAGMA have
better mechanical properties compared with the blend with PE-g-MA, even though the
mechanical properties lowered than uncompatibilized 80PBT/20LDPE blend. FESEM
study indicated less phase separation suggesting better interaction between the
components in PBT/LDPE/EMAGMA blends compared with the PBT/LDPE/PE-g-MA
blends. In conclusion, EMAGMA is considered as a better compatibilizer compared with
PE-g-MA, but it could not act as an effective compatibilizer for the PBT/LDPE blend
system at low content. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-06T15:53:20Z |
format | Monograph |
id | usm.eprints-52472 |
institution | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-06T15:53:20Z |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Universiti Sains Malaysia |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | usm.eprints-524722022-05-09T07:14:33Z http://eprints.usm.my/52472/ Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie T Technology TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials The effect of different compositions of polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) and low density polyethylene (LDPE) blends (20/80, 50/50, 80/20 of PBT/LDPE) and the effect of different amounts (5, 10 and 15 wt%) of poly (ethylene -co- methyl acrylate -co- glycidyl methacrylate) (EMAGMA) terpolymer and polyethylene grafted maleic anhydride (PEg- MA) as compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties of PBT/LDPE blends were investigated. Field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) showed two phase morphology with poor interaction between the phases. Based on mechanical properties, 80PBT/20LDPE exhibited the highest tensile strength and modulus and it was considered as the optimum blend system. Incorporation of EMAGMA or PE-g-MA as compatibilizer in the 80PBT/20LDPE blend showed improvement in impact strength but reduction in tensile strength. However, 80PBT/20LDPE blend with EMAGMA have better mechanical properties compared with the blend with PE-g-MA, even though the mechanical properties lowered than uncompatibilized 80PBT/20LDPE blend. FESEM study indicated less phase separation suggesting better interaction between the components in PBT/LDPE/EMAGMA blends compared with the PBT/LDPE/PE-g-MA blends. In conclusion, EMAGMA is considered as a better compatibilizer compared with PE-g-MA, but it could not act as an effective compatibilizer for the PBT/LDPE blend system at low content. Universiti Sains Malaysia 2017-07-01 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie (2017) Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate. Project Report. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pusat Pengajian Kejuruteraan Bahan Sumber Mineral. (Submitted) |
spellingShingle | T Technology TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials Roslly, Nurul Amira Izzatie Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title | Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title_full | Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title_fullStr | Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title_short | Effect Of Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl Acrylate-Coglycidyl Methacrylate |
title_sort | effect of poly ethylene co methyl acrylate coglycidyl methacrylate |
topic | T Technology TA401-492 Materials of engineering and construction. Mechanics of materials |
url | http://eprints.usm.my/52472/1/Effect%20Of%20Poly-Ethylene-Co-Methyl%20Acrylate-Coglycidyl%20Methacrylate_Nurul%20Amira%20Izzatie%20Roslly_B1_2017.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosllynurulamiraizzatie effectofpolyethylenecomethylacrylatecoglycidylmethacrylate |