A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient

Background. The aims of this study are to compare TCI with MCI propofol as sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients. Methods. Post emergency craniotomy for severe TBI patients (n = 50), were randomly assigned to receive propofol sedation over 24 hours using two modes of infusion:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin
Format: Monograph
Language:English
Published: Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.usm.my/54645/1/Mohd%20Nazaruddin%20W%20Hassan-Eprints.pdf
_version_ 1797013263773335552
author W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin
author_facet W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin
author_sort W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin
collection USM
description Background. The aims of this study are to compare TCI with MCI propofol as sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients. Methods. Post emergency craniotomy for severe TBI patients (n = 50), were randomly assigned to receive propofol sedation over 24 hours using two modes of infusion: TCI versus MCI (n = 25 in each groups). Sedation was monitored using bispectral index \BIS) monitor and sedation agitation scale (SAS). TCI was titrated between 0.2-2.0 llg mr and MCI was between 0.3-4.0 mg kg·1 h"1 to achieve sedative state at BIS 60-70 and SAS 2-3. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), time taken and volume used to achieve BIS 70, total volume of propofol over 24 hours and recovery time to BIS 90 were recorded. Results. TCI achieved BIS 70 significantly faster than MCI (6.3 ± 2.9 min vs. 19.7 ± 7.0 min). Total volume of propofol at BIS 70 was significantly less in TCI (12.0 ± 2.9 ml vs.l7.8 ± 4.3 ml). Recovery time to BIS 90 was also significantly faster in TCI (24.4 ± 11.5 min vs. 57.3 ± 19.9 min). TCI showed significantly lower in HR and ICP trends over 24 hours. CPP trends were significantly higher in TCI. There were no significant differences in MAP and total volume over 24 hours. Conclusions. TCI modes had more advantages for propofol sedation in TBI by providing faster onset and offset of sedation and better in controlling ICP and CPP.
first_indexed 2024-03-06T15:59:41Z
format Monograph
id usm.eprints-54645
institution Universiti Sains Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-06T15:59:41Z
publishDate 2010
publisher Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia
record_format dspace
spelling usm.eprints-546452022-09-14T02:55:55Z http://eprints.usm.my/54645/ A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin R Medicine Background. The aims of this study are to compare TCI with MCI propofol as sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured (TBI) patients. Methods. Post emergency craniotomy for severe TBI patients (n = 50), were randomly assigned to receive propofol sedation over 24 hours using two modes of infusion: TCI versus MCI (n = 25 in each groups). Sedation was monitored using bispectral index \BIS) monitor and sedation agitation scale (SAS). TCI was titrated between 0.2-2.0 llg mr and MCI was between 0.3-4.0 mg kg·1 h"1 to achieve sedative state at BIS 60-70 and SAS 2-3. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), time taken and volume used to achieve BIS 70, total volume of propofol over 24 hours and recovery time to BIS 90 were recorded. Results. TCI achieved BIS 70 significantly faster than MCI (6.3 ± 2.9 min vs. 19.7 ± 7.0 min). Total volume of propofol at BIS 70 was significantly less in TCI (12.0 ± 2.9 ml vs.l7.8 ± 4.3 ml). Recovery time to BIS 90 was also significantly faster in TCI (24.4 ± 11.5 min vs. 57.3 ± 19.9 min). TCI showed significantly lower in HR and ICP trends over 24 hours. CPP trends were significantly higher in TCI. There were no significant differences in MAP and total volume over 24 hours. Conclusions. TCI modes had more advantages for propofol sedation in TBI by providing faster onset and offset of sedation and better in controlling ICP and CPP. Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia 2010 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.usm.my/54645/1/Mohd%20Nazaruddin%20W%20Hassan-Eprints.pdf W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin (2010) A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient. Other. Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan, Universiti Sains Malaysia. (Submitted)
spellingShingle R Medicine
W Hassan, W Mohd Nazaruddin
A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title_full A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title_fullStr A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title_short A comparative study of target contolled infusion (TCI) and manual controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain-injured patient
title_sort comparative study of target contolled infusion tci and manual controlled infusion mci of propofol for sedation in severe traumatic brain injured patient
topic R Medicine
url http://eprints.usm.my/54645/1/Mohd%20Nazaruddin%20W%20Hassan-Eprints.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT whassanwmohdnazaruddin acomparativestudyoftargetcontolledinfusiontciandmanualcontrolledinfusionmciofpropofolforsedationinseveretraumaticbraininjuredpatient
AT whassanwmohdnazaruddin comparativestudyoftargetcontolledinfusiontciandmanualcontrolledinfusionmciofpropofolforsedationinseveretraumaticbraininjuredpatient