Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios

This study compared the performance of Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM) and Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in simulating observed runoff and projecting future runoff using 11 CMIP6 GCMs. The projected runoff was estimated for two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), 2–4.5 and 5–8.5 for nea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Song, Young Hoon, Chung, Eun Sung, Shahid, Shamsuddin
Format: Article
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2022
Subjects:
_version_ 1796867564168544256
author Song, Young Hoon
Chung, Eun Sung
Shahid, Shamsuddin
author_facet Song, Young Hoon
Chung, Eun Sung
Shahid, Shamsuddin
author_sort Song, Young Hoon
collection ePrints
description This study compared the performance of Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM) and Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in simulating observed runoff and projecting future runoff using 11 CMIP6 GCMs. The projected runoff was estimated for two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), 2–4.5 and 5–8.5 for near (2021–2060) and far (2061–2100) futures, respectively. The biases in GCM simulated climate variables were corrected using quantile mapping considering observations at 6 weather stations as reference data over the historical period (1985–2014). Five evaluation metrics were used to quantify the GCM's and hydrological models' capability to reconstruct climate variables and runoff in the Yeongsan Basin of South Korea. Uncertainties in LSTM and SWAT simulated runoff for the historical and projected periods were quantified using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and reliability ensemble averaging (REA), respectively. The results showed significant improvement in bias-corrected GCMs in replicating observations in terms of all evaluation metrics. The extreme runoff estimated using general extreme value (GEV) distribution revealed the better capability of LSTM than SWAT in reproducing observed runoff at all gauging locations. The SWAT projected an increase (17.7%) while LSTM projected a decrease (−13.6%) in the future runoff for both SSPs at most locations. The uncertainty in LSTM simulated runoff was lower than in SWAT runoff at all stations for the historical period. However, the uncertainty in SWAT projected runoff was lower than LSTM projected runoff for both SSPs. This study helps assessing the ability of deep-learning versus physically-based models in hydrological modeling and therefore opens new perspectives for hydrological modeling applications.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T21:29:09Z
format Article
id utm.eprints-103964
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
last_indexed 2024-03-05T21:29:09Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-1039642023-12-10T04:46:08Z http://eprints.utm.my/103964/ Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios Song, Young Hoon Chung, Eun Sung Shahid, Shamsuddin TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) This study compared the performance of Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM) and Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in simulating observed runoff and projecting future runoff using 11 CMIP6 GCMs. The projected runoff was estimated for two Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), 2–4.5 and 5–8.5 for near (2021–2060) and far (2061–2100) futures, respectively. The biases in GCM simulated climate variables were corrected using quantile mapping considering observations at 6 weather stations as reference data over the historical period (1985–2014). Five evaluation metrics were used to quantify the GCM's and hydrological models' capability to reconstruct climate variables and runoff in the Yeongsan Basin of South Korea. Uncertainties in LSTM and SWAT simulated runoff for the historical and projected periods were quantified using Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) and reliability ensemble averaging (REA), respectively. The results showed significant improvement in bias-corrected GCMs in replicating observations in terms of all evaluation metrics. The extreme runoff estimated using general extreme value (GEV) distribution revealed the better capability of LSTM than SWAT in reproducing observed runoff at all gauging locations. The SWAT projected an increase (17.7%) while LSTM projected a decrease (−13.6%) in the future runoff for both SSPs at most locations. The uncertainty in LSTM simulated runoff was lower than in SWAT runoff at all stations for the historical period. However, the uncertainty in SWAT projected runoff was lower than LSTM projected runoff for both SSPs. This study helps assessing the ability of deep-learning versus physically-based models in hydrological modeling and therefore opens new perspectives for hydrological modeling applications. Elsevier B.V. 2022-09-10 Article PeerReviewed Song, Young Hoon and Chung, Eun Sung and Shahid, Shamsuddin (2022) Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios. Science of the Total Environment, 838 (NA). pp. 1-19. ISSN 0048-9697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156162 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156162
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Song, Young Hoon
Chung, Eun Sung
Shahid, Shamsuddin
Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title_full Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title_fullStr Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title_short Differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using SWAT and LSTM for SSP scenarios
title_sort differences in extremes and uncertainties in future runoff simulations using swat and lstm for ssp scenarios
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
work_keys_str_mv AT songyounghoon differencesinextremesanduncertaintiesinfuturerunoffsimulationsusingswatandlstmforsspscenarios
AT chungeunsung differencesinextremesanduncertaintiesinfuturerunoffsimulationsusingswatandlstmforsspscenarios
AT shahidshamsuddin differencesinextremesanduncertaintiesinfuturerunoffsimulationsusingswatandlstmforsspscenarios