In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.

Terrestrial gamma radiation dose (TGRD) rates were measured in situ from different locations in Katsina State, Nigeria, using a portable radiation survey metre based on geological formations and soil types. The measured TGRD rates ranged from 45 to 271 nGyh–1 with an average value of 116 ± 1 nGyh–1....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru, Abdulkadir, Mukhtar, Nasiru, Rabiu, Saleh, Muneer Aziz, Bello, Suleiman, Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin, Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim, Kankara, Usman Musa
Format: Article
Published: Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2023
Subjects:
_version_ 1811132241509613568
author Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru
Abdulkadir, Mukhtar
Nasiru, Rabiu
Saleh, Muneer Aziz
Bello, Suleiman
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim
Kankara, Usman Musa
author_facet Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru
Abdulkadir, Mukhtar
Nasiru, Rabiu
Saleh, Muneer Aziz
Bello, Suleiman
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim
Kankara, Usman Musa
author_sort Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru
collection ePrints
description Terrestrial gamma radiation dose (TGRD) rates were measured in situ from different locations in Katsina State, Nigeria, using a portable radiation survey metre based on geological formations and soil types. The measured TGRD rates ranged from 45 to 271 nGyh–1 with an average value of 116 ± 1 nGyh–1. Geological formation (silicified sheared rock) and soil type (lithosols and ferruginous crusts and ferruginous tropical soils) appeared to have the highest mean TGRD values of 163 and 134 nGyh–1 with sandstone geological formation and alluvial and hydromorphic soils having the lowest TGRD with values of 80 and 61 nGyh–1, respectively. One way ANOVA results shows that the tested null hypothesis was rejected. Thus, indicating that there exists a strong relationship between the various geological formations, soil types with the measured TGRD values based on the alternate hypothesis. Human health hazard indices like annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE), lifetime outdoor annual equivalent dose, and relative excess lifetime outdoor cancer risk associated with the mean TGRD of the study area were also calculated and found to be 0.711, 9.955 mSv, and 5.79 × 10–4, respectively. These values were higher than the world average values but favourable compared with the safety limits recommended by ICRP.
first_indexed 2024-09-24T00:00:10Z
format Article
id utm.eprints-105956
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
last_indexed 2024-09-24T00:00:10Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor and Francis Ltd.
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-1059562024-05-29T06:30:05Z http://eprints.utm.my/105956/ In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria. Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru Abdulkadir, Mukhtar Nasiru, Rabiu Saleh, Muneer Aziz Bello, Suleiman Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim Kankara, Usman Musa TP Chemical technology Terrestrial gamma radiation dose (TGRD) rates were measured in situ from different locations in Katsina State, Nigeria, using a portable radiation survey metre based on geological formations and soil types. The measured TGRD rates ranged from 45 to 271 nGyh–1 with an average value of 116 ± 1 nGyh–1. Geological formation (silicified sheared rock) and soil type (lithosols and ferruginous crusts and ferruginous tropical soils) appeared to have the highest mean TGRD values of 163 and 134 nGyh–1 with sandstone geological formation and alluvial and hydromorphic soils having the lowest TGRD with values of 80 and 61 nGyh–1, respectively. One way ANOVA results shows that the tested null hypothesis was rejected. Thus, indicating that there exists a strong relationship between the various geological formations, soil types with the measured TGRD values based on the alternate hypothesis. Human health hazard indices like annual effective dose equivalent (AEDE), lifetime outdoor annual equivalent dose, and relative excess lifetime outdoor cancer risk associated with the mean TGRD of the study area were also calculated and found to be 0.711, 9.955 mSv, and 5.79 × 10–4, respectively. These values were higher than the world average values but favourable compared with the safety limits recommended by ICRP. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2023 Article PeerReviewed Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru and Abdulkadir, Mukhtar and Nasiru, Rabiu and Saleh, Muneer Aziz and Bello, Suleiman and Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin and Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim and Kankara, Usman Musa (2023) In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria. Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies, 59 (1). pp. 112-125. ISSN 1025-6016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2023.2172001 DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2023.2172001
spellingShingle TP Chemical technology
Garba, Nuraddeen Nasiru
Abdulkadir, Mukhtar
Nasiru, Rabiu
Saleh, Muneer Aziz
Bello, Suleiman
Khandaker, Mayeen Uddin
Che Abdullah, Che Azurahanim
Kankara, Usman Musa
In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title_full In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title_fullStr In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title_full_unstemmed In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title_short In situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in Katsina State, Nigeria.
title_sort in situ assessment of terrestrial gamma radiation dose and associated radiological hazards in katsina state nigeria
topic TP Chemical technology
work_keys_str_mv AT garbanuraddeennasiru insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT abdulkadirmukhtar insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT nasirurabiu insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT salehmuneeraziz insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT bellosuleiman insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT khandakermayeenuddin insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT cheabdullahcheazurahanim insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria
AT kankarausmanmusa insituassessmentofterrestrialgammaradiationdoseandassociatedradiologicalhazardsinkatsinastatenigeria