The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence

The crash of Enron in the US, followed by the worldwide collapse of its auditor, Arthur Andersen (Andersen), has shaken the business world. It was the biggest corporate collapse uncovered in business history. Since then, the investor and public's perception towards the accounting and auditing p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/1440/1/DewiFarihaAbdullah2004_TheEnronAndersenRegulatoryReview.pdf
_version_ 1796853241627017216
author Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha
author_facet Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha
author_sort Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha
collection ePrints
description The crash of Enron in the US, followed by the worldwide collapse of its auditor, Arthur Andersen (Andersen), has shaken the business world. It was the biggest corporate collapse uncovered in business history. Since then, the investor and public's perception towards the accounting and auditing profession has been badly tarred. Following Enron -Andersen scandal, giant companies like WorldCom, Xerox and WasteManagement faced similar fate. Worst still, the auditors of all these companies are among the Big Fives (now Big Fours). Nevertheless, the reputation of most certified public accountant (CPA) firms are seriously confronting the problems of regaining public's confidence at post-Enron era. Among the major issues elevated was 'auditor independence' of the CPA firms. Arguments rest on the issue of auditor independence and factors like regulatory framework, and business pressures (also corporate governance) that are found to be major contributor to crashes of Enron like. In response to the scandal, the standard-setters, regulators, professions and other related bodies (in the UK and the US) emerged with constructive proposals, which aim to strengthen auditor independence (and corporate accountability). Though, new regulatory have been laid out, the success rate is yet proven. This paper review holds the regulatory scenario depicted in the UK and the US. This is after considering that most of the recent bankrupt cases and regulatory reviews are actively performed in both countries
first_indexed 2024-03-05T17:56:40Z
format Article
id utm.eprints-1440
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T17:56:40Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-14402017-05-30T07:39:20Z http://eprints.utm.my/1440/ The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha H Social Sciences (General) The crash of Enron in the US, followed by the worldwide collapse of its auditor, Arthur Andersen (Andersen), has shaken the business world. It was the biggest corporate collapse uncovered in business history. Since then, the investor and public's perception towards the accounting and auditing profession has been badly tarred. Following Enron -Andersen scandal, giant companies like WorldCom, Xerox and WasteManagement faced similar fate. Worst still, the auditors of all these companies are among the Big Fives (now Big Fours). Nevertheless, the reputation of most certified public accountant (CPA) firms are seriously confronting the problems of regaining public's confidence at post-Enron era. Among the major issues elevated was 'auditor independence' of the CPA firms. Arguments rest on the issue of auditor independence and factors like regulatory framework, and business pressures (also corporate governance) that are found to be major contributor to crashes of Enron like. In response to the scandal, the standard-setters, regulators, professions and other related bodies (in the UK and the US) emerged with constructive proposals, which aim to strengthen auditor independence (and corporate accountability). Though, new regulatory have been laid out, the success rate is yet proven. This paper review holds the regulatory scenario depicted in the UK and the US. This is after considering that most of the recent bankrupt cases and regulatory reviews are actively performed in both countries Faculty of Management and Human Resource Development 2004-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/1440/1/DewiFarihaAbdullah2004_TheEnronAndersenRegulatoryReview.pdf Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha (2004) The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence. Jurnal Kemanusiaan (4). pp. 30-44. ISSN 1675-1930 http://www.management.utm.my/download/jurnal-kemanusiaan/bil-04-dis-2004/91-the-enron-andersen-regulatory-review-to-strengthen-auditor-independence.html
spellingShingle H Social Sciences (General)
Abdullah @ Earnest, Dewi Fariha
The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title_full The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title_fullStr The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title_full_unstemmed The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title_short The Enron-Andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
title_sort enron andersen regulatory review to strengthen auditor independence
topic H Social Sciences (General)
url http://eprints.utm.my/1440/1/DewiFarihaAbdullah2004_TheEnronAndersenRegulatoryReview.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahearnestdewifariha theenronandersenregulatoryreviewtostrengthenauditorindependence
AT abdullahearnestdewifariha enronandersenregulatoryreviewtostrengthenauditorindependence