Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science
Solid modeling theory and technology are maturing rapidly. We have seen explosive growth in the field based on scientific literature reviews, and by the number of solid modelers that are commercially available. Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) is a method used to represent solid objects in many con...
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | English English |
| Publicado: |
Penerbit UTM Press
2007
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://eprints.utm.my/5720/1/HabibollahHaron2007_SolidModelerEvaluationandComparison.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/5720/2/jurnalteknologi/article/view/264 |
| _version_ | 1825909778828754944 |
|---|---|
| author | Romli, Awanis Haron, Habibollah |
| author_facet | Romli, Awanis Haron, Habibollah |
| author_sort | Romli, Awanis |
| collection | ePrints |
| description | Solid modeling theory and technology are maturing rapidly. We have seen explosive growth in the field based on scientific literature reviews, and by the number of solid modelers that are commercially available. Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) is a method used to represent solid objects in many contemporary solid modeling systems. A CSG representation is a binary tree whose nonterminal nodes represent Boolean operations and whose terminal nodes represent primitive solids. In this paper, the comparison between four solid modelers in term of their difficulties and friendliness in designing and representing a solid object are presented. The solid modelers are AutoCAD 2004, Solid Edge V12, SolidWorks 2001 plus, and 3D Studio Max 7. The research methodology is based on Solid Modeler Evaluation and Comparison Cycle (SMECC) methodology. This paper documents seven performance parameters in the design process namely, extrusion, setup time, ease of use, speed, flexibility, feature based design, and CSG tree. The outcomes presented by this paper is expected to assist companies and design educators in making solid modeler selection decisions |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-05T18:07:14Z |
| format | Article |
| id | utm.eprints-5720 |
| institution | Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints |
| language | English English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-05T18:07:14Z |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publisher | Penerbit UTM Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | utm.eprints-57202017-11-01T04:17:25Z http://eprints.utm.my/5720/ Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science Romli, Awanis Haron, Habibollah QA76 Computer software Solid modeling theory and technology are maturing rapidly. We have seen explosive growth in the field based on scientific literature reviews, and by the number of solid modelers that are commercially available. Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) is a method used to represent solid objects in many contemporary solid modeling systems. A CSG representation is a binary tree whose nonterminal nodes represent Boolean operations and whose terminal nodes represent primitive solids. In this paper, the comparison between four solid modelers in term of their difficulties and friendliness in designing and representing a solid object are presented. The solid modelers are AutoCAD 2004, Solid Edge V12, SolidWorks 2001 plus, and 3D Studio Max 7. The research methodology is based on Solid Modeler Evaluation and Comparison Cycle (SMECC) methodology. This paper documents seven performance parameters in the design process namely, extrusion, setup time, ease of use, speed, flexibility, feature based design, and CSG tree. The outcomes presented by this paper is expected to assist companies and design educators in making solid modeler selection decisions Penerbit UTM Press 2007-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/5720/1/HabibollahHaron2007_SolidModelerEvaluationandComparison.pdf text/html en http://eprints.utm.my/5720/2/jurnalteknologi/article/view/264 Romli, Awanis and Haron, Habibollah (2007) Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science. Jurnal Teknologi, 47 (D). pp. 15-26. ISSN 0127-9696 DOI:10.11113/jt.v47.264 |
| spellingShingle | QA76 Computer software Romli, Awanis Haron, Habibollah Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title | Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title_full | Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title_fullStr | Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title_full_unstemmed | Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title_short | Solid modeler evaluation and comparison: perspective of computer science |
| title_sort | solid modeler evaluation and comparison perspective of computer science |
| topic | QA76 Computer software |
| url | http://eprints.utm.my/5720/1/HabibollahHaron2007_SolidModelerEvaluationandComparison.pdf http://eprints.utm.my/5720/2/jurnalteknologi/article/view/264 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT romliawanis solidmodelerevaluationandcomparisonperspectiveofcomputerscience AT haronhabibollah solidmodelerevaluationandcomparisonperspectiveofcomputerscience |