How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?

Dynamic technology development and innovation of the 21st century have challenged chemical engineers in their working aspects. Future engineers are required to have high competitiveness in knowledge and skills in a fast changing world, requiring them to adapt and learn fast at a deep level. Conseque...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jumari, N. F., Yusof, K. M., Phang, F. A.
Format: Article
Published: Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC 2017
Subjects:
_version_ 1796862404371415040
author Jumari, N. F.
Yusof, K. M.
Phang, F. A.
author_facet Jumari, N. F.
Yusof, K. M.
Phang, F. A.
author_sort Jumari, N. F.
collection ePrints
description Dynamic technology development and innovation of the 21st century have challenged chemical engineers in their working aspects. Future engineers are required to have high competitiveness in knowledge and skills in a fast changing world, requiring them to adapt and learn fast at a deep level. Consequently, education becomes a crucial means in developing matured learners who can efficiently adapt and acquire new knowledge and skills. Determining the students' approach to learning as early as possible, whether deep or surface learning, is important to assist the students in their learning. Their approach to learning can reflect their academic performance. The objective of this study is to determine the learning approach of first year chemical engineering students in a Malaysian research university. To achieve this objective, a pre-post quasiexperimental design was used to determine the approach to learning of 57 first year chemical engineering students. Revised Study Process Questionnaire (RSPQ-2F), a 20-item instrument developed by John Biggs and colleagues was used to measure the student's learning approach at the beginning and at the end of the first semester. The quantitative data were analyzed using pair-sample t-Test to measure the mean RSPQ-2F scores. A p-value < .05 was considered as significant. The findings show that the students mostly use deep approach compared to surface approach to learning at the beginning of the semester. At the end of the semester, there was a slight increase in their deep approach to learning, although the increase is not significant. Similarly, there was a slight decrease in surface learning, although the decrease is not significant.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T20:11:08Z
format Article
id utm.eprints-75795
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
last_indexed 2024-03-05T20:11:08Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-757952018-05-30T03:58:05Z http://eprints.utm.my/75795/ How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning? Jumari, N. F. Yusof, K. M. Phang, F. A. TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Dynamic technology development and innovation of the 21st century have challenged chemical engineers in their working aspects. Future engineers are required to have high competitiveness in knowledge and skills in a fast changing world, requiring them to adapt and learn fast at a deep level. Consequently, education becomes a crucial means in developing matured learners who can efficiently adapt and acquire new knowledge and skills. Determining the students' approach to learning as early as possible, whether deep or surface learning, is important to assist the students in their learning. Their approach to learning can reflect their academic performance. The objective of this study is to determine the learning approach of first year chemical engineering students in a Malaysian research university. To achieve this objective, a pre-post quasiexperimental design was used to determine the approach to learning of 57 first year chemical engineering students. Revised Study Process Questionnaire (RSPQ-2F), a 20-item instrument developed by John Biggs and colleagues was used to measure the student's learning approach at the beginning and at the end of the first semester. The quantitative data were analyzed using pair-sample t-Test to measure the mean RSPQ-2F scores. A p-value < .05 was considered as significant. The findings show that the students mostly use deep approach compared to surface approach to learning at the beginning of the semester. At the end of the semester, there was a slight increase in their deep approach to learning, although the increase is not significant. Similarly, there was a slight decrease in surface learning, although the decrease is not significant. Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC 2017 Article PeerReviewed Jumari, N. F. and Yusof, K. M. and Phang, F. A. (2017) How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning? Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56 . pp. 1009-1014. ISSN 2283-9216 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85019493904&doi=10.3303%2fCET1756169&partnerID=40&md5=e9cf520492b2beb194726bb8bc0f0e2a
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Jumari, N. F.
Yusof, K. M.
Phang, F. A.
How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title_full How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title_fullStr How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title_full_unstemmed How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title_short How do first year Malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning?
title_sort how do first year malaysian chemical engineering students approach learning
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
work_keys_str_mv AT jumarinf howdofirstyearmalaysianchemicalengineeringstudentsapproachlearning
AT yusofkm howdofirstyearmalaysianchemicalengineeringstudentsapproachlearning
AT phangfa howdofirstyearmalaysianchemicalengineeringstudentsapproachlearning