Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)

An outcomes-based accreditation system for engineering programs was adopted in 2001 in the United States and is used by all full and provisional signatories of the Washington Accord. The system requires major transformations in the ways engineering curricula are structured, delivered, and assessed....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard, M. Felder
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/896/1/Session_O1-001.pdf
_version_ 1796853156796170240
author Richard, M. Felder
author_facet Richard, M. Felder
author_sort Richard, M. Felder
collection ePrints
description An outcomes-based accreditation system for engineering programs was adopted in 2001 in the United States and is used by all full and provisional signatories of the Washington Accord. The system requires major transformations in the ways engineering curricula are structured, delivered, and assessed. As might be expected, many engineering staff members are less than enthusiastic about the proposed changes, arguing that the existing system has always functioned well and needs no radical revision. The ongoing debate involves four focal issues: (1) How should engineering curricula be structured? (2) How should engineering courses be taught and assessed? (3) Who should teach? (4) How should the teachers be prepared? This paper outlines the opposing positions on each of these issues' the traditional position, which has been the predominant approach in engineering education for the past five decades, and the alternative position, which is far more compatible with the requirements of the Washington Accord.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T17:55:26Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id utm.eprints-896
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-05T17:55:26Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-8962017-08-27T05:47:36Z http://eprints.utm.my/896/ Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner) Richard, M. Felder LB2300 Higher Education An outcomes-based accreditation system for engineering programs was adopted in 2001 in the United States and is used by all full and provisional signatories of the Washington Accord. The system requires major transformations in the ways engineering curricula are structured, delivered, and assessed. As might be expected, many engineering staff members are less than enthusiastic about the proposed changes, arguing that the existing system has always functioned well and needs no radical revision. The ongoing debate involves four focal issues: (1) How should engineering curricula be structured? (2) How should engineering courses be taught and assessed? (3) Who should teach? (4) How should the teachers be prepared? This paper outlines the opposing positions on each of these issues' the traditional position, which has been the predominant approach in engineering education for the past five decades, and the alternative position, which is far more compatible with the requirements of the Washington Accord. 2005-12-12 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://eprints.utm.my/896/1/Session_O1-001.pdf Richard, M. Felder (2005) Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner). In: Regional Conference on Engineering Education RCEE 2005, 12-13 Dec 2005, Johor, Malaysia.
spellingShingle LB2300 Higher Education
Richard, M. Felder
Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title_full Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title_fullStr Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title_full_unstemmed Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title_short Engineering Education in 2015 (or Sooner)
title_sort engineering education in 2015 or sooner
topic LB2300 Higher Education
url http://eprints.utm.my/896/1/Session_O1-001.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT richardmfelder engineeringeducationin2015orsooner