Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus

Most of the building design has a combination of natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation is used for indoor cooling purposes in many large enclosed spaces. However, this cooling method is insufficient to provide the occupants with a comfortable temperature level due to low wind velocity and t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Musa, M. K., Ting, C. M., A. Rahman, M. A., Awang, M., Hamidon, Nuramidah, Syafiq Syazwan, M. M., Yusop, Fatimah, Ahmad, Faridahanim
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Published: 2021
Subjects:
_version_ 1796865812883046400
author Musa, M. K.
Ting, C. M.
A. Rahman, M. A.
Awang, M.
Hamidon, Nuramidah
Syafiq Syazwan, M. M.
Yusop, Fatimah
Ahmad, Faridahanim
author_facet Musa, M. K.
Ting, C. M.
A. Rahman, M. A.
Awang, M.
Hamidon, Nuramidah
Syafiq Syazwan, M. M.
Yusop, Fatimah
Ahmad, Faridahanim
author_sort Musa, M. K.
collection ePrints
description Most of the building design has a combination of natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation is used for indoor cooling purposes in many large enclosed spaces. However, this cooling method is insufficient to provide the occupants with a comfortable temperature level due to low wind velocity and the inability of a mechanical ventilator to remove warm air. The aim of this study is to evaluate the thermal comfort in a multipurpose hall. To assess the thermal perception of occupants in the multipurpose space, 179 occupants were randomly selected to participate in the survey. In addition, 4 indoor environmental variables were calculated using the Thermal Comfort Kit, including air temperature, air velocity, globe temperature and relative humidity. Data from questionnaire surveys and fieldwork measurements were obtained at the same time for 6 days between September and November 2019. All data collected were interpreted using the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) indices, which reflect the state of thermal comfort within the multipurpose hall. For this analysis, the PMV and PPD values for fieldwork measurements are 2.1 and 82.6%, while the thermal sensation voting values are 1.6 and 55%. Both PMV and PPD values for thermal environment measurement in the multipurpose hall and questionnaire survey exceed the respective upper limits as recommended in ASHRAE Standard 55 (2017) and the acceptability criterion in ISO 7730 (2005), indicating that the thermal comfort within the hall is warm.
first_indexed 2024-03-05T21:02:48Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id utm.eprints-94390
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia - ePrints
last_indexed 2024-03-05T21:02:48Z
publishDate 2021
record_format dspace
spelling utm.eprints-943902022-03-31T15:21:34Z http://eprints.utm.my/94390/ Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus Musa, M. K. Ting, C. M. A. Rahman, M. A. Awang, M. Hamidon, Nuramidah Syafiq Syazwan, M. M. Yusop, Fatimah Ahmad, Faridahanim TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) Most of the building design has a combination of natural ventilation and mechanical ventilation is used for indoor cooling purposes in many large enclosed spaces. However, this cooling method is insufficient to provide the occupants with a comfortable temperature level due to low wind velocity and the inability of a mechanical ventilator to remove warm air. The aim of this study is to evaluate the thermal comfort in a multipurpose hall. To assess the thermal perception of occupants in the multipurpose space, 179 occupants were randomly selected to participate in the survey. In addition, 4 indoor environmental variables were calculated using the Thermal Comfort Kit, including air temperature, air velocity, globe temperature and relative humidity. Data from questionnaire surveys and fieldwork measurements were obtained at the same time for 6 days between September and November 2019. All data collected were interpreted using the Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) and Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) indices, which reflect the state of thermal comfort within the multipurpose hall. For this analysis, the PMV and PPD values for fieldwork measurements are 2.1 and 82.6%, while the thermal sensation voting values are 1.6 and 55%. Both PMV and PPD values for thermal environment measurement in the multipurpose hall and questionnaire survey exceed the respective upper limits as recommended in ASHRAE Standard 55 (2017) and the acceptability criterion in ISO 7730 (2005), indicating that the thermal comfort within the hall is warm. 2021 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed Musa, M. K. and Ting, C. M. and A. Rahman, M. A. and Awang, M. and Hamidon, Nuramidah and Syafiq Syazwan, M. M. and Yusop, Fatimah and Ahmad, Faridahanim (2021) Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus. In: 3rd International Conference on Separation Technology, ICoST 2020, 15 - 16 August 2020, Virtual, Online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0742-4_10
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Musa, M. K.
Ting, C. M.
A. Rahman, M. A.
Awang, M.
Hamidon, Nuramidah
Syafiq Syazwan, M. M.
Yusop, Fatimah
Ahmad, Faridahanim
Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title_full Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title_fullStr Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title_full_unstemmed Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title_short Thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
title_sort thermal comfort evaluation at the multipurpose hall of an academic campus
topic TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
work_keys_str_mv AT musamk thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT tingcm thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT arahmanma thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT awangm thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT hamidonnuramidah thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT syafiqsyazwanmm thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT yusopfatimah thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus
AT ahmadfaridahanim thermalcomfortevaluationatthemultipurposehallofanacademiccampus