| Summary: | The purpose of this study is to analyse the conflict of South China Sea area and develop an ontology architecture South China Sea conflict. The South China Sea is a marginal sea that is part of the Pacific Ocean, covering an area of about 3,500,000 square kilometers (1,400,000 sq mi) from the Karimata and Malacca Straits to the Taiwan Strait. Under its seabed are believed to be huge oil and gas reserves. In addition, several countries are subject to competing claims of sovereignty for the sea and its mostly uninhabited islands. The variety of names used for the islands and the sea also reflect these claims. The disputes within the South China Sea can possibly touch off an increasingly broad territorial conflagration. Various claimants fight about issues of sovereignty not defenseless to simple lawful goals. More regrettable, the stakes are high which is the Sea is one of the primary courses for overall worldwide market, and various claimants trust that the Sea covers up abundant oil saves notwithstanding its copious fishing stocks. Other than that, the disputes are additionally discover by wild patriotism, as each inquirer joins symbolic motivation toward the South China Sea’s islands that deep exceed their aim material wealth. Furthermore, Ontology is the study of being's philosophy. More broadly, its studies concepts that are directly related to becoming, existence, reality in particular, as well as the basic categories of being and their relationships. Traditionally listed as part of the major branch of philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology frequently deals with questions about what entities exist or can be said to exist and how these entities can be grouped, linked within a hierarchy, and subdivided by similarities and differences about South China Sea conflicts.
|
|---|