An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia
Government of today must facilitate business activities and promote efficient policies to smoothen the processes of doing business.The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011 has listed inefficient government bureaucracy as top most problematic factor experienced by businesses in Malaysia and Indone...
| Үндсэн зохиолчид: | , |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Өгүүллэг |
| Хэл сонгох: | English |
| Хэвлэсэн: |
College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia
2011
|
| Нөхцлүүд: | |
| Онлайн хандалт: | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/11917/1/11.pdf |
| _version_ | 1825802916053647360 |
|---|---|
| author | Haryono, Endi Khalil, Samihah |
| author_facet | Haryono, Endi Khalil, Samihah |
| author_sort | Haryono, Endi |
| collection | UUM |
| description | Government of today must facilitate business activities and promote efficient policies to smoothen the processes of doing business.The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011 has listed inefficient government bureaucracy as top most problematic factor experienced by businesses in Malaysia and Indonesia.Despite immense efforts being taken by both governments to improve this negative image,
bureaucracy efficiency rankings are still poor.Both Malaysia and Indonesia are gearing up systematic reform to raise efficiency of government machinery via combating corruption and red tape. This paper begins with a brief discussion on bureaucracy efficiency and its link with business growth from the perspective of three performance ranking reports which review Malaysia and Indonesia’s
recent performance years.A comparative note is presented to review what rankings and scores and how these dwindling positions reflect bureaucracy performance.The paper examines political and administration changes
which contribute to low score of government machinery despite sound transformation policy for Malaysia and corruption initiatives for Indonesia.The study analyses Global Competitiveness Report, World Bank Doing Business report and Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Survey from 2008 to 2011 for Malaysia and Indonesia in order to portray the ranking and score of Malaysia and Indonesia bureaucracy.The annual report of Government Linked Companies (GLCs), auditing firms and government budget speeches of Malaysia were examined to find evidence for
bureaucracy performance in Malaysia.In order to encompass a wider picture of the corruption in Indonesia, media source is taken as its main source. Ranking and score of analyses Global Competitiveness Report, World Bank Doing Business report and Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Survey are presented in tabular form
at followed by a discussion of the results. Textual analysis is performed on annual reports, budget speeches and media reports information and findings gathered from these sources are narrated to offer a perspective of the policy in Malaysia and corruption in Indonesia. |
| first_indexed | 2024-07-04T05:48:23Z |
| format | Article |
| id | uum-11917 |
| institution | Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-07-04T05:48:23Z |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publisher | College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| record_format | eprints |
| spelling | uum-119172014-08-24T07:32:36Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/11917/ An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia Haryono, Endi Khalil, Samihah HD28 Management. Industrial Management Government of today must facilitate business activities and promote efficient policies to smoothen the processes of doing business.The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011 has listed inefficient government bureaucracy as top most problematic factor experienced by businesses in Malaysia and Indonesia.Despite immense efforts being taken by both governments to improve this negative image, bureaucracy efficiency rankings are still poor.Both Malaysia and Indonesia are gearing up systematic reform to raise efficiency of government machinery via combating corruption and red tape. This paper begins with a brief discussion on bureaucracy efficiency and its link with business growth from the perspective of three performance ranking reports which review Malaysia and Indonesia’s recent performance years.A comparative note is presented to review what rankings and scores and how these dwindling positions reflect bureaucracy performance.The paper examines political and administration changes which contribute to low score of government machinery despite sound transformation policy for Malaysia and corruption initiatives for Indonesia.The study analyses Global Competitiveness Report, World Bank Doing Business report and Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Survey from 2008 to 2011 for Malaysia and Indonesia in order to portray the ranking and score of Malaysia and Indonesia bureaucracy.The annual report of Government Linked Companies (GLCs), auditing firms and government budget speeches of Malaysia were examined to find evidence for bureaucracy performance in Malaysia.In order to encompass a wider picture of the corruption in Indonesia, media source is taken as its main source. Ranking and score of analyses Global Competitiveness Report, World Bank Doing Business report and Political and Economic Risk Consultancy Survey are presented in tabular form at followed by a discussion of the results. Textual analysis is performed on annual reports, budget speeches and media reports information and findings gathered from these sources are narrated to offer a perspective of the policy in Malaysia and corruption in Indonesia. College of Law, Government and International Studies, Universiti Utara Malaysia 2011 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/11917/1/11.pdf Haryono, Endi and Khalil, Samihah (2011) An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Development, 7. pp. 58-71. ISSN 2289-4756 http://www.jgd.uum.edu.my/ |
| spellingShingle | HD28 Management. Industrial Management Haryono, Endi Khalil, Samihah An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title | An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title_full | An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title_fullStr | An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title_full_unstemmed | An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title_short | An examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business: Comparing Malaysia with Indonesia |
| title_sort | examination of government bureaucracy in facilitating business comparing malaysia with indonesia |
| topic | HD28 Management. Industrial Management |
| url | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/11917/1/11.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT haryonoendi anexaminationofgovernmentbureaucracyinfacilitatingbusinesscomparingmalaysiawithindonesia AT khalilsamihah anexaminationofgovernmentbureaucracyinfacilitatingbusinesscomparingmalaysiawithindonesia AT haryonoendi examinationofgovernmentbureaucracyinfacilitatingbusinesscomparingmalaysiawithindonesia AT khalilsamihah examinationofgovernmentbureaucracyinfacilitatingbusinesscomparingmalaysiawithindonesia |