A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectiv...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2004
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf |
_version_ | 1825803272588361728 |
---|---|
author | Auda, Gasser |
author_facet | Auda, Gasser |
author_sort | Auda, Gasser |
collection | UUM |
description | This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectives designed for users with certain background knowledge.The Instructor, to be replaced with the Intelligent Expert System, decides on the student’s level based on his/her answer to a detailed questionnaire.The paper critically compares the Instructor’s performance to three systematic approaches - procedural programs, logic expert systems, and neural networks. |
first_indexed | 2024-07-04T05:54:09Z |
format | Conference or Workshop Item |
id | uum-13909 |
institution | Universiti Utara Malaysia |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-07-04T05:54:09Z |
publishDate | 2004 |
record_format | eprints |
spelling | uum-139092015-05-12T02:45:31Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/ A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making Auda, Gasser QA76 Computer software This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectives designed for users with certain background knowledge.The Instructor, to be replaced with the Intelligent Expert System, decides on the student’s level based on his/her answer to a detailed questionnaire.The paper critically compares the Instructor’s performance to three systematic approaches - procedural programs, logic expert systems, and neural networks. 2004-02-14 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf Auda, Gasser (2004) A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making. In: Knowledge Management International Conference and Exhibition 2004 (KMICE 2004), 14-15 February 2004, Evergreen Laurel Hotel, Penang. http://www.kmice.cms.net.my |
spellingShingle | QA76 Computer software Auda, Gasser A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title | A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title_full | A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title_fullStr | A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title_full_unstemmed | A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title_short | A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making |
title_sort | critique of using machine intelligence for e decision making |
topic | QA76 Computer software |
url | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT audagasser acritiqueofusingmachineintelligenceforedecisionmaking AT audagasser critiqueofusingmachineintelligenceforedecisionmaking |