A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making

This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Auda, Gasser
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf
_version_ 1825803272588361728
author Auda, Gasser
author_facet Auda, Gasser
author_sort Auda, Gasser
collection UUM
description This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectives designed for users with certain background knowledge.The Instructor, to be replaced with the Intelligent Expert System, decides on the student’s level based on his/her answer to a detailed questionnaire.The paper critically compares the Instructor’s performance to three systematic approaches - procedural programs, logic expert systems, and neural networks.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T05:54:09Z
format Conference or Workshop Item
id uum-13909
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T05:54:09Z
publishDate 2004
record_format eprints
spelling uum-139092015-05-12T02:45:31Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/ A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making Auda, Gasser QA76 Computer software This paper is a critique of Artificial Intelligent agents used in the hearts of e-planning and e decision making systems in general.It refers to a case study of a web site that teaches JAVA programming language and is designed as a multi-level curriculum, each level with specific curricular objectives designed for users with certain background knowledge.The Instructor, to be replaced with the Intelligent Expert System, decides on the student’s level based on his/her answer to a detailed questionnaire.The paper critically compares the Instructor’s performance to three systematic approaches - procedural programs, logic expert systems, and neural networks. 2004-02-14 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf Auda, Gasser (2004) A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making. In: Knowledge Management International Conference and Exhibition 2004 (KMICE 2004), 14-15 February 2004, Evergreen Laurel Hotel, Penang. http://www.kmice.cms.net.my
spellingShingle QA76 Computer software
Auda, Gasser
A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title_full A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title_fullStr A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title_full_unstemmed A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title_short A critique of using machine intelligence for e-decision-making
title_sort critique of using machine intelligence for e decision making
topic QA76 Computer software
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/13909/1/KM186.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT audagasser acritiqueofusingmachineintelligenceforedecisionmaking
AT audagasser critiqueofusingmachineintelligenceforedecisionmaking