An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms
Previous studies reveal that engagement risk, which consist of audit risk, auditor business risk and client business risk, has an important role in audit firms’ client acceptance decision.This study examines the engagement risk differences between auditee of Big Four and non-Big Four firms in Malays...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/18268/1/NIDA%20IBC%202016%201-18.pdf |
_version_ | 1825804010150428672 |
---|---|
author | Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi Abidin, Shamharir |
author_facet | Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi Abidin, Shamharir |
author_sort | Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi |
collection | UUM |
description | Previous studies reveal that engagement risk, which consist of audit risk, auditor business risk and client business risk, has an important role in audit firms’ client acceptance decision.This study examines the engagement risk differences between auditee of Big Four and non-Big Four firms in Malaysia from 2008 to 2010. The results suggest that both of the firms have different types of engagement of risk characteristics.The differences are prevalent in the case of auditor business risk and client business risk.Auditor business risk is higher for large audit firms, and their client business risk is lower than non-Big Four firms.The differences of engagement risk characteristics of both types of the firms might be due to their business strategy adaptation. |
first_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:07:25Z |
format | Conference or Workshop Item |
id | uum-18268 |
institution | Universiti Utara Malaysia |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:07:25Z |
publishDate | 2016 |
record_format | eprints |
spelling | uum-182682016-06-27T07:59:32Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/18268/ An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi Abidin, Shamharir HD28 Management. Industrial Management Previous studies reveal that engagement risk, which consist of audit risk, auditor business risk and client business risk, has an important role in audit firms’ client acceptance decision.This study examines the engagement risk differences between auditee of Big Four and non-Big Four firms in Malaysia from 2008 to 2010. The results suggest that both of the firms have different types of engagement of risk characteristics.The differences are prevalent in the case of auditor business risk and client business risk.Auditor business risk is higher for large audit firms, and their client business risk is lower than non-Big Four firms.The differences of engagement risk characteristics of both types of the firms might be due to their business strategy adaptation. 2016-03-12 Conference or Workshop Item NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/18268/1/NIDA%20IBC%202016%201-18.pdf Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi and Abidin, Shamharir (2016) An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms. In: NIDA International Business Conference 2016, 12 March 2016, Bangkok, Thailand. (Unpublished) |
spellingShingle | HD28 Management. Industrial Management Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi Abidin, Shamharir An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title | An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title_full | An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title_fullStr | An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title_short | An analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non-big four firms |
title_sort | analysis of engagement risk differences in big four and non big four firms |
topic | HD28 Management. Industrial Management |
url | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/18268/1/NIDA%20IBC%202016%201-18.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamadnormohamadnaimi ananalysisofengagementriskdifferencesinbigfourandnonbigfourfirms AT abidinshamharir ananalysisofengagementriskdifferencesinbigfourandnonbigfourfirms AT mohamadnormohamadnaimi analysisofengagementriskdifferencesinbigfourandnonbigfourfirms AT abidinshamharir analysisofengagementriskdifferencesinbigfourandnonbigfourfirms |