The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen

Over the years, and based on Western studies, researchers concluded that the level of accountants’ moral reasoning is low, i.e. pre-conventional moral reasoning, which mean professional accountants do not have a higher level of moral reasoning than average individuals do and other professionals.Howe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan, Abdul Ghani, Abdullah, Md. Idris, Kamil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IRMBR 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/21940/1/IRMBR%203%201%202014%201797%201808.pdf
_version_ 1825804653809369088
author Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan
Abdul Ghani, Abdullah
Md. Idris, Kamil
author_facet Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan
Abdul Ghani, Abdullah
Md. Idris, Kamil
author_sort Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan
collection UUM
description Over the years, and based on Western studies, researchers concluded that the level of accountants’ moral reasoning is low, i.e. pre-conventional moral reasoning, which mean professional accountants do not have a higher level of moral reasoning than average individuals do and other professionals.However, such level may probably not be true to Muslim’s accountants because they are operating in an Islamic environment that can shape the way they behave. To identify the level of accountants’ moral reasoning, this study used Defining Issues Test specifically for accounting (DIT-A) and from an Islamic perspective.It is important to measure how Yemeni professional accountants perceive prescriptively (ideally) and deliberatively (realities) on issues related to the moral code of conduct.This is because Islam emphasizes consistency between thought and action. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the link between prescriptive and deliberative accountants’ moral reasoning.Data were collected from 138 professional accountants in four main cities of Yemen i.e. Sana’a, Hadhramout, Taiz, and Aden. Results showed that Yemeni professional accountants exhibit higher level of moral reasoning beyond the conventional level and there is a consistency between the prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning. Besides, the limitations of the study are highlighted
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:19:11Z
format Article
id uum-21940
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:19:11Z
publishDate 2014
publisher IRMBR
record_format eprints
spelling uum-219402017-05-02T10:09:49Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/21940/ The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan Abdul Ghani, Abdullah Md. Idris, Kamil BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc HF5601 Accounting Over the years, and based on Western studies, researchers concluded that the level of accountants’ moral reasoning is low, i.e. pre-conventional moral reasoning, which mean professional accountants do not have a higher level of moral reasoning than average individuals do and other professionals.However, such level may probably not be true to Muslim’s accountants because they are operating in an Islamic environment that can shape the way they behave. To identify the level of accountants’ moral reasoning, this study used Defining Issues Test specifically for accounting (DIT-A) and from an Islamic perspective.It is important to measure how Yemeni professional accountants perceive prescriptively (ideally) and deliberatively (realities) on issues related to the moral code of conduct.This is because Islam emphasizes consistency between thought and action. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to examine the link between prescriptive and deliberative accountants’ moral reasoning.Data were collected from 138 professional accountants in four main cities of Yemen i.e. Sana’a, Hadhramout, Taiz, and Aden. Results showed that Yemeni professional accountants exhibit higher level of moral reasoning beyond the conventional level and there is a consistency between the prescriptive and deliberative moral reasoning. Besides, the limitations of the study are highlighted IRMBR 2014-12 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/21940/1/IRMBR%203%201%202014%201797%201808.pdf Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan and Abdul Ghani, Abdullah and Md. Idris, Kamil (2014) The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3 (1). pp. 1797-1808. ISSN 2306-9007 http://www.irmbrjournal.com/papers/1418112603.pdf
spellingShingle BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
HF5601 Accounting
Al-Aidaros, Al-Hasan
Abdul Ghani, Abdullah
Md. Idris, Kamil
The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title_full The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title_fullStr The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title_full_unstemmed The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title_short The consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants? Moral reasoning: case in Yemen
title_sort consistency between prescriptive and deliberative accountants moral reasoning case in yemen
topic BP Islam. Bahaism. Theosophy, etc
HF5601 Accounting
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/21940/1/IRMBR%203%201%202014%201797%201808.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alaidarosalhasan theconsistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen
AT abdulghaniabdullah theconsistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen
AT mdidriskamil theconsistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen
AT alaidarosalhasan consistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen
AT abdulghaniabdullah consistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen
AT mdidriskamil consistencybetweenprescriptiveanddeliberativeaccountantsmoralreasoningcaseinyemen