Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence

Purpose – The validity of any performance assessment depends substantially on the rating scale used in the assessment procedure. It delineates the theoretical construct being measured and influences how performances are judged and interpreted. This study examined the factorial validity and in varian...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abu Kassim, Noor Lide, Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim, Nordin, Mohd Sahari, Zubairi, Ainol Madziah, Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2018
Subjects:
_version_ 1803628836437360640
author Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim
Nordin, Mohd Sahari
Zubairi, Ainol Madziah
Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati
author_facet Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim
Nordin, Mohd Sahari
Zubairi, Ainol Madziah
Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati
author_sort Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
collection UUM
description Purpose – The validity of any performance assessment depends substantially on the rating scale used in the assessment procedure. It delineates the theoretical construct being measured and influences how performances are judged and interpreted. This study examined the factorial validity and in variance of the rating scale used for the assessment of the essay writing component of the Malaysian University English Test (MUET) in terms of the correspondence to empirical data and the theoretical construct of ESL writing. Methodology – To determine the factorial validity of the MUET essay writing rating scale, a measurement model was developed based on the criteria description of the scale. Model-data fit was tested using CFA. The data comprised 392 essays, taken from a university English proficiency examination. Factorial in variance was tested through consecutively more restrictive models.Findings – 3-factor structure model was found to produce the best fit to the data. Factorial in variance was tested by examining the comparability of the structure and values of parameters within the model across two groups. A more restrictive model was subsequently tested, where variances and co variances of the latent constructs together with factor loading's were constrained to be equal for the two groups. The resultant goodness-of-fit indices showed a better fit to the data, providing support for the factorial in variance of the 3-factor structure model.Significance – The results support a 3-factor structure model, congruent with the theory of ESL writing. However, further validation needs to be carried out across different ESL populations to ensure accurate representation and assessment of ESL writing performance.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:28:17Z
format Article
id uum-24936
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:28:17Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
record_format dspace
spelling uum-249362018-10-14T01:59:49Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/24936/ Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence Abu Kassim, Noor Lide Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim Nordin, Mohd Sahari Zubairi, Ainol Madziah Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati LB2300 Higher Education Purpose – The validity of any performance assessment depends substantially on the rating scale used in the assessment procedure. It delineates the theoretical construct being measured and influences how performances are judged and interpreted. This study examined the factorial validity and in variance of the rating scale used for the assessment of the essay writing component of the Malaysian University English Test (MUET) in terms of the correspondence to empirical data and the theoretical construct of ESL writing. Methodology – To determine the factorial validity of the MUET essay writing rating scale, a measurement model was developed based on the criteria description of the scale. Model-data fit was tested using CFA. The data comprised 392 essays, taken from a university English proficiency examination. Factorial in variance was tested through consecutively more restrictive models.Findings – 3-factor structure model was found to produce the best fit to the data. Factorial in variance was tested by examining the comparability of the structure and values of parameters within the model across two groups. A more restrictive model was subsequently tested, where variances and co variances of the latent constructs together with factor loading's were constrained to be equal for the two groups. The resultant goodness-of-fit indices showed a better fit to the data, providing support for the factorial in variance of the 3-factor structure model.Significance – The results support a 3-factor structure model, congruent with the theory of ESL writing. However, further validation needs to be carried out across different ESL populations to ensure accurate representation and assessment of ESL writing performance. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2018-06 Article PeerReviewed Abu Kassim, Noor Lide and Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim and Nordin, Mohd Sahari and Zubairi, Ainol Madziah and Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati (2018) Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 15 (1). pp. 265-285. ISSN 1675-8110 http://www.mjli.uum.edu.my/index.php/current-issues#ii
spellingShingle LB2300 Higher Education
Abu Kassim, Noor Lide
Badrasawi, Kamal Jamil Inbrahim
Nordin, Mohd Sahari
Zubairi, Ainol Madziah
Mohd Ashraf, Ratnawati
Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title_full Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title_fullStr Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title_full_unstemmed Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title_short Factorial Validity and Invariance of the MUET Writing Rating Scale: Empirical and Theoretical Correspondence
title_sort factorial validity and invariance of the muet writing rating scale empirical and theoretical correspondence
topic LB2300 Higher Education
work_keys_str_mv AT abukassimnoorlide factorialvalidityandinvarianceofthemuetwritingratingscaleempiricalandtheoreticalcorrespondence
AT badrasawikamaljamilinbrahim factorialvalidityandinvarianceofthemuetwritingratingscaleempiricalandtheoreticalcorrespondence
AT nordinmohdsahari factorialvalidityandinvarianceofthemuetwritingratingscaleempiricalandtheoreticalcorrespondence
AT zubairiainolmadziah factorialvalidityandinvarianceofthemuetwritingratingscaleempiricalandtheoreticalcorrespondence
AT mohdashrafratnawati factorialvalidityandinvarianceofthemuetwritingratingscaleempiricalandtheoreticalcorrespondence