Compensating Balance: A Comment

Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Choi, Youngna, Yoon, Yeomin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25117/1/IJBF%202%202004%2083%2098.pdf
_version_ 1803628870234013696
author Choi, Youngna
Yoon, Yeomin
author_facet Choi, Youngna
Yoon, Yeomin
author_sort Choi, Youngna
collection UUM
description Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method.It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true.It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:28:49Z
format Article
id uum-25117
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:28:49Z
publishDate 2004
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
record_format dspace
spelling uum-251172018-11-01T01:27:45Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25117/ Compensating Balance: A Comment Choi, Youngna Yoon, Yeomin HG Finance Compensating balance are deposits the borrowing firm keeps with the lending bank in non-interest bearing accounts on loans.It is well known that, when there is no compensating balance imposed, the effective cost of debt remains the same in the two different payment methods, full amortization method and bullet loan (bond) method.It has been experimentally shown that when a compensating balance is imposed, however, the respective effective costs of debt under the two payment methods become different and that the true cost of a fully-amortized loan is always greater than that of a bullet loan. This paper provides a mathematical proof than this is always true.It concludes that, whenever a bank imposes a compensating balance, the borrowing firm should prefer a bullet loan to a fully-amortized one if it wishes to avoid an ambush posed by such a compensating balance. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2004 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25117/1/IJBF%202%202004%2083%2098.pdf Choi, Youngna and Yoon, Yeomin (2004) Compensating Balance: A Comment. International Journal of Banking and Finance (IIJBF), 2. pp. 83-98. ISSN 1675-7227 http://ijbf.uum.edu.my/index.php/previous-issues/133-the-international-journal-of-banking-and-finance-ijbf-vol-2-no-1-june-2004
spellingShingle HG Finance
Choi, Youngna
Yoon, Yeomin
Compensating Balance: A Comment
title Compensating Balance: A Comment
title_full Compensating Balance: A Comment
title_fullStr Compensating Balance: A Comment
title_full_unstemmed Compensating Balance: A Comment
title_short Compensating Balance: A Comment
title_sort compensating balance a comment
topic HG Finance
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25117/1/IJBF%202%202004%2083%2098.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyoungna compensatingbalanceacomment
AT yoonyeomin compensatingbalanceacomment