Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK)
Purpose Money laundering has been a focal problem worldwide. Governments constantly come up with initiatives to fight against this offence. To clean proceeds of corruption, the laundering of money is utilised as it transforms ‘dirty’ money into ‘clean’ ones. A comparative analysis between Malaysia’s...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25535/1/JMLC%2021%201%202019%20104-111.pdf |
| _version_ | 1803628952489558016 |
|---|---|
| author | Aurasu, Anusha A. Rahman, Aspalella |
| author_facet | Aurasu, Anusha A. Rahman, Aspalella |
| author_sort | Aurasu, Anusha |
| collection | UUM |
| description | Purpose Money laundering has been a focal problem worldwide. Governments constantly come up with initiatives to fight against this offence. To clean proceeds of corruption, the laundering of money is utilised as it transforms ‘dirty’ money into ‘clean’ ones. A comparative analysis between Malaysia’s AMLATFPUAA and UK’s POCA will be made on the basis of the similarities and differences of both legislations, in terms of forfeiture provisions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the current forfeiture regime in both jurisdictions is effective in fighting against money laundering. Design/methodology/approach This paper will be based on a doctrinal research where reliance will mainly be on relevant case laws and legislations. AMLATFPUAA and POCA are key legislations which will be utilised for the purpose of analysis. Findings Strengths and weaknesses of both AMLATFPUAA and POCA are identified through a comparative analysis where findings show that POCA is more comprehensive than AMLATFPUAA in terms of offences covered by it and standard of proof. With that, the anti-money laundering laws can further be improvised by being a better and efficient regime where Malaysia and UK will be able to discharge their duties effectively on forfeiting benefits from criminals. Originality/value This paper would offer some guiding principles for academics, banks, their legal advisers, practitioners and policy makers, not only in Malaysia but also elsewhere. |
| first_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:30:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | uum-25535 |
| institution | Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-07-04T06:30:08Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | uum-255352019-01-31T06:39:36Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25535/ Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) Aurasu, Anusha A. Rahman, Aspalella KZ Law of Nations Purpose Money laundering has been a focal problem worldwide. Governments constantly come up with initiatives to fight against this offence. To clean proceeds of corruption, the laundering of money is utilised as it transforms ‘dirty’ money into ‘clean’ ones. A comparative analysis between Malaysia’s AMLATFPUAA and UK’s POCA will be made on the basis of the similarities and differences of both legislations, in terms of forfeiture provisions. The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether the current forfeiture regime in both jurisdictions is effective in fighting against money laundering. Design/methodology/approach This paper will be based on a doctrinal research where reliance will mainly be on relevant case laws and legislations. AMLATFPUAA and POCA are key legislations which will be utilised for the purpose of analysis. Findings Strengths and weaknesses of both AMLATFPUAA and POCA are identified through a comparative analysis where findings show that POCA is more comprehensive than AMLATFPUAA in terms of offences covered by it and standard of proof. With that, the anti-money laundering laws can further be improvised by being a better and efficient regime where Malaysia and UK will be able to discharge their duties effectively on forfeiting benefits from criminals. Originality/value This paper would offer some guiding principles for academics, banks, their legal advisers, practitioners and policy makers, not only in Malaysia but also elsewhere. Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2018 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25535/1/JMLC%2021%201%202019%20104-111.pdf Aurasu, Anusha and A. Rahman, Aspalella (2018) Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK). Journal of Money Laundering Control, 21 (1). pp. 104-111. ISSN 1368-5201 http://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-04-2017-0016 doi:10.1108/JMLC-04-2017-0016 doi:10.1108/JMLC-04-2017-0016 |
| spellingShingle | KZ Law of Nations Aurasu, Anusha A. Rahman, Aspalella Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title | Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title_full | Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title_fullStr | Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title_short | Forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti-money laundering laws: a comparative analysis between Malaysia and United Kingdom (UK) |
| title_sort | forfeiture of criminal proceeds under anti money laundering laws a comparative analysis between malaysia and united kingdom uk |
| topic | KZ Law of Nations |
| url | https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/25535/1/JMLC%2021%201%202019%20104-111.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aurasuanusha forfeitureofcriminalproceedsunderantimoneylaunderinglawsacomparativeanalysisbetweenmalaysiaandunitedkingdomuk AT arahmanaspalella forfeitureofcriminalproceedsunderantimoneylaunderinglawsacomparativeanalysisbetweenmalaysiaandunitedkingdomuk |