Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims

The doctrine of standing or locus standi governs the rule of competency of a person submitting their grievances to the court. A beneficiary being an incompetent plaintiff due to the lack of locus standi will not be a qualified litigant to seek the court intervention in administering deceased estate....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina, Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul
Format: Article
Published: UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies 2019
Subjects:
_version_ 1825805438825791488
author Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina
Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul
author_facet Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina
Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul
author_sort Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina
collection UUM
description The doctrine of standing or locus standi governs the rule of competency of a person submitting their grievances to the court. A beneficiary being an incompetent plaintiff due to the lack of locus standi will not be a qualified litigant to seek the court intervention in administering deceased estate. The prevailing legal position in Malaysia is that estate beneficiaries are not authorised to bring any action against any party on behalf of the estate until and unless a sealed order of the letter of representation has been extracted. The needled issue to be discuss is whether the doctrine of standing has denied the inherent right of beneficiaries to enjoy the deceased estate. Hence, in the light of this scenario, this paper aims to analyse the tendency of the court in deciding cases relating to the standing of beneficiaries who are not personal representatives if they wish to bring claims on behalf of the estate. In this context, this paper uses the content analysis method to analyse the decided cases and relevant legal provisions. This paper concludes that Federal Court had whittled down the strict rule that beneficiaries should first obtain the grant of letters of representations of deceased’s’ estates that provide them with the locus standi of bringing any legal claims on behalf of the estates. In allowing the claims made by the beneficiaries the court acknowledged the existence of special circumstances which to be applied in a very limited manners and exceptional cases only.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:32:19Z
format Article
id uum-26250
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:32:19Z
publishDate 2019
publisher UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies
record_format eprints
spelling uum-262502019-07-25T02:52:35Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/26250/ Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul KZ Law of Nations The doctrine of standing or locus standi governs the rule of competency of a person submitting their grievances to the court. A beneficiary being an incompetent plaintiff due to the lack of locus standi will not be a qualified litigant to seek the court intervention in administering deceased estate. The prevailing legal position in Malaysia is that estate beneficiaries are not authorised to bring any action against any party on behalf of the estate until and unless a sealed order of the letter of representation has been extracted. The needled issue to be discuss is whether the doctrine of standing has denied the inherent right of beneficiaries to enjoy the deceased estate. Hence, in the light of this scenario, this paper aims to analyse the tendency of the court in deciding cases relating to the standing of beneficiaries who are not personal representatives if they wish to bring claims on behalf of the estate. In this context, this paper uses the content analysis method to analyse the decided cases and relevant legal provisions. This paper concludes that Federal Court had whittled down the strict rule that beneficiaries should first obtain the grant of letters of representations of deceased’s’ estates that provide them with the locus standi of bringing any legal claims on behalf of the estates. In allowing the claims made by the beneficiaries the court acknowledged the existence of special circumstances which to be applied in a very limited manners and exceptional cases only. UUM College of Law, Government and International Studies 2019-07 Article PeerReviewed Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina and Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul (2019) Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 10 (2). ISSN 2229-984X http://www.uumjls.uum.edu.my/index.php/forthcoming-articles
spellingShingle KZ Law of Nations
Mohd Noor, Nor Azlina
Abd Aziz, Ahmad Shamsul
Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title_full Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title_fullStr Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title_full_unstemmed Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title_short Standing' room only: a vintage issue in estate administration claims
title_sort standing room only a vintage issue in estate administration claims
topic KZ Law of Nations
work_keys_str_mv AT mohdnoornorazlina standingroomonlyavintageissueinestateadministrationclaims
AT abdazizahmadshamsul standingroomonlyavintageissueinestateadministrationclaims