A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system

By developing a two-stage model the paper examines the cost inefficiency levels of Turkish banks during the period from 2007 to 2016. Using the notion of Koopmans input efficiency we deconstruct the estimated Nerlovian cost inefficiency to the sum of slack-based allocative and technical inefficiency...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fukuyama, Hirofumi, Matousek, Roman, Tzeremes, Nickolaos G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/27157/1/O%2095%202020%201%2013.pdf
_version_ 1825805600923058176
author Fukuyama, Hirofumi
Matousek, Roman
Tzeremes, Nickolaos G.
author_facet Fukuyama, Hirofumi
Matousek, Roman
Tzeremes, Nickolaos G.
author_sort Fukuyama, Hirofumi
collection UUM
description By developing a two-stage model the paper examines the cost inefficiency levels of Turkish banks during the period from 2007 to 2016. Using the notion of Koopmans input efficiency we deconstruct the estimated Nerlovian cost inefficiency to the sum of slack-based allocative and technical inefficiency levels. Alongside the traditional inputs, intermediates and outputs used to model banks’ performance measure we additionally use their labor education quality factor as a non-discretionary input. This allows us to model how human capital factors affect a bank's revenue generation stage. Our findings suggest that cost inefficiency levels are driven mainly by a bank's ability to control its allocative inefficiency levels. The empirical evidence also shows that foreign banks perform better, suggesting that bank ownership structures matter when measuring cost performance. Finally, it is evident that the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) had a negative effect on banks’ ability to minimize their cost inefficiency levels. However, the post-crisis findings demonstrate that Turkish banks have started to recover from its negative effects, mainly by improving their allocative performance.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:34:57Z
format Article
id uum-27157
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:34:57Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format eprints
spelling uum-271572020-06-29T01:54:01Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/27157/ A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system Fukuyama, Hirofumi Matousek, Roman Tzeremes, Nickolaos G. HJ Public Finance By developing a two-stage model the paper examines the cost inefficiency levels of Turkish banks during the period from 2007 to 2016. Using the notion of Koopmans input efficiency we deconstruct the estimated Nerlovian cost inefficiency to the sum of slack-based allocative and technical inefficiency levels. Alongside the traditional inputs, intermediates and outputs used to model banks’ performance measure we additionally use their labor education quality factor as a non-discretionary input. This allows us to model how human capital factors affect a bank's revenue generation stage. Our findings suggest that cost inefficiency levels are driven mainly by a bank's ability to control its allocative inefficiency levels. The empirical evidence also shows that foreign banks perform better, suggesting that bank ownership structures matter when measuring cost performance. Finally, it is evident that the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) had a negative effect on banks’ ability to minimize their cost inefficiency levels. However, the post-crisis findings demonstrate that Turkish banks have started to recover from its negative effects, mainly by improving their allocative performance. Elsevier Ltd. 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/27157/1/O%2095%202020%201%2013.pdf Fukuyama, Hirofumi and Matousek, Roman and Tzeremes, Nickolaos G. (2020) A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system. Omega, 95. pp. 1-13. ISSN 03050483 http://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2020.102198 doi:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102198 doi:10.1016/j.omega.2020.102198
spellingShingle HJ Public Finance
Fukuyama, Hirofumi
Matousek, Roman
Tzeremes, Nickolaos G.
A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title_full A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title_fullStr A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title_full_unstemmed A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title_short A Nerlovian cost inefficiency two-stage DEA model for modeling banks’ production process: Evidence from the Turkish banking system
title_sort nerlovian cost inefficiency two stage dea model for modeling banks production process evidence from the turkish banking system
topic HJ Public Finance
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/27157/1/O%2095%202020%201%2013.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT fukuyamahirofumi anerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem
AT matousekroman anerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem
AT tzeremesnickolaosg anerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem
AT fukuyamahirofumi nerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem
AT matousekroman nerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem
AT tzeremesnickolaosg nerloviancostinefficiencytwostagedeamodelformodelingbanksproductionprocessevidencefromtheturkishbankingsystem