Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed under the field of computer science for more than 50 years. AI somehow only gains its prominence in the recent millennia when the necessary tools to test the hypothesis on nature of thought became available. Unfortunately, the absence of legal regulati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Manap, Nazura, Abdullah, Azrol
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28855/1/UUMJLS%2011%2002%202020%20183-201.pdf
_version_ 1803629534695653376
author Abdul Manap, Nazura
Abdullah, Azrol
author_facet Abdul Manap, Nazura
Abdullah, Azrol
author_sort Abdul Manap, Nazura
collection UUM
description Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed under the field of computer science for more than 50 years. AI somehow only gains its prominence in the recent millennia when the necessary tools to test the hypothesis on nature of thought became available. Unfortunately, the absence of legal regulation on AI has caused AI to exist in a regulatory vacuum and nature abhors vacuum. The law is at the state of confusion about who shall be blameworthy for the damage caused by AI. The prevalence of this problem triggers for the expatiation of this review article in defining the scope of AI that must be regulated. The objective of this article is to suggest that AI with certain capabilities must be placed in the legal realm. This article will first begin by highlighting the problems associated with AI before directing the focus of the discussion to the various reasons that justify for AI to be regulated. This article will then explore the various approaches which can be adopted by government in regulating AI. These approaches can be a workable formula to procure the two-tier methods in regulating AI in Malaysia. The methodology devised for this article is based on doctrinal research where most of the materials are derived from text books, online resources and established academic databases. The findings made in this article suggest that AI must be regulated independently from the existing legal framework. Reason being, AI capabilities are unique in its own sense and therefore cannot be treated like other previous technologies. The outcome of this article will also able to contribute on issues relating to the legal liability of AI in Malaysia.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:39:23Z
format Article
id uum-28855
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:39:23Z
publishDate 2020
publisher UUM Press
record_format dspace
spelling uum-288552022-09-07T01:23:05Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28855/ Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach Abdul Manap, Nazura Abdullah, Azrol K Law (General) Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been developed under the field of computer science for more than 50 years. AI somehow only gains its prominence in the recent millennia when the necessary tools to test the hypothesis on nature of thought became available. Unfortunately, the absence of legal regulation on AI has caused AI to exist in a regulatory vacuum and nature abhors vacuum. The law is at the state of confusion about who shall be blameworthy for the damage caused by AI. The prevalence of this problem triggers for the expatiation of this review article in defining the scope of AI that must be regulated. The objective of this article is to suggest that AI with certain capabilities must be placed in the legal realm. This article will first begin by highlighting the problems associated with AI before directing the focus of the discussion to the various reasons that justify for AI to be regulated. This article will then explore the various approaches which can be adopted by government in regulating AI. These approaches can be a workable formula to procure the two-tier methods in regulating AI in Malaysia. The methodology devised for this article is based on doctrinal research where most of the materials are derived from text books, online resources and established academic databases. The findings made in this article suggest that AI must be regulated independently from the existing legal framework. Reason being, AI capabilities are unique in its own sense and therefore cannot be treated like other previous technologies. The outcome of this article will also able to contribute on issues relating to the legal liability of AI in Malaysia. UUM Press 2020 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28855/1/UUMJLS%2011%2002%202020%20183-201.pdf Abdul Manap, Nazura and Abdullah, Azrol (2020) Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach. UUM Journal of Legal Studies (UUMJLS), 11 (02). pp. 183-201. ISSN 2229-984X
spellingShingle K Law (General)
Abdul Manap, Nazura
Abdullah, Azrol
Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title_full Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title_fullStr Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title_full_unstemmed Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title_short Regulating artificial intelligence in Malaysia: the two-tier approach
title_sort regulating artificial intelligence in malaysia the two tier approach
topic K Law (General)
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28855/1/UUMJLS%2011%2002%202020%20183-201.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulmanapnazura regulatingartificialintelligenceinmalaysiathetwotierapproach
AT abdullahazrol regulatingartificialintelligenceinmalaysiathetwotierapproach