Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis

This study investigated the competitiveness index of the fourteen states in Malaysia. It also examined various aspects of competitiveness among states and vital elements that might influence competitiveness by utilizing a three-level hierarchical indicator system encompassing economic, social and en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chee, Ann Lim, Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam, Adam, Radziah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UUM Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28990/1/MMJ%2025%202021%2001-24.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1
_version_ 1803629558991159296
author Chee, Ann Lim
Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam
Adam, Radziah
author_facet Chee, Ann Lim
Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam
Adam, Radziah
author_sort Chee, Ann Lim
collection UUM
description This study investigated the competitiveness index of the fourteen states in Malaysia. It also examined various aspects of competitiveness among states and vital elements that might influence competitiveness by utilizing a three-level hierarchical indicator system encompassing economic, social and environmental factors. An equally weighted index was applied to scrutinize the three dimensions. The index output was based on 24 indicators across six components. The critical components were economic performance, economic structure, marketization and openness, social aspects, domestic security and environmental quality. This study also examined the relationship between the components of competitiveness and economic growth for states in Malaysia by using the panel data estimation approach; a method which utilised data sets for fourteen states over a period extending from 2005 to 2016. Data were then analysed using a panel data regression model. Overall, findings showed that Selangor, where Kuala Lumpur the national capital was situated, was the most competitive state. In 2016, Kuala Lumpur was the best performer in terms of economic performance, social aspects and environmental quality. It was also found that domestic security and environmental quality were significant determinants of economic growth, which had enhanced competitiveness among states in Malaysia. A state’s performance according to the three dimensions varied greatly as there were different factors of specializations for each state. This study has proposed that each state in the federation possessed a significant economic performance, as well as substantial social and environmental development to ensure and sustain their respective state of competitiveness.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:39:46Z
format Article
id uum-28990
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:39:46Z
publishDate 2021
publisher UUM Press
record_format dspace
spelling uum-289902023-05-21T14:46:23Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28990/ Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis Chee, Ann Lim Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam Adam, Radziah HC Economic History and Conditions This study investigated the competitiveness index of the fourteen states in Malaysia. It also examined various aspects of competitiveness among states and vital elements that might influence competitiveness by utilizing a three-level hierarchical indicator system encompassing economic, social and environmental factors. An equally weighted index was applied to scrutinize the three dimensions. The index output was based on 24 indicators across six components. The critical components were economic performance, economic structure, marketization and openness, social aspects, domestic security and environmental quality. This study also examined the relationship between the components of competitiveness and economic growth for states in Malaysia by using the panel data estimation approach; a method which utilised data sets for fourteen states over a period extending from 2005 to 2016. Data were then analysed using a panel data regression model. Overall, findings showed that Selangor, where Kuala Lumpur the national capital was situated, was the most competitive state. In 2016, Kuala Lumpur was the best performer in terms of economic performance, social aspects and environmental quality. It was also found that domestic security and environmental quality were significant determinants of economic growth, which had enhanced competitiveness among states in Malaysia. A state’s performance according to the three dimensions varied greatly as there were different factors of specializations for each state. This study has proposed that each state in the federation possessed a significant economic performance, as well as substantial social and environmental development to ensure and sustain their respective state of competitiveness. UUM Press 2021 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28990/1/MMJ%2025%202021%2001-24.pdf Chee, Ann Lim and Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam and Adam, Radziah (2021) Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis. Malaysian Management Journal, 25. pp. 1-24. ISSN 0128-6226 https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/mmj/article/view/11163 https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1 https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1
spellingShingle HC Economic History and Conditions
Chee, Ann Lim
Tuan Lonik, Ku Azam
Adam, Radziah
Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title_full Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title_fullStr Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title_short Constructing a competitiveness index for states in Malaysia: A panel data analysis
title_sort constructing a competitiveness index for states in malaysia a panel data analysis
topic HC Economic History and Conditions
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/28990/1/MMJ%2025%202021%2001-24.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/mmj2021.25.1
work_keys_str_mv AT cheeannlim constructingacompetitivenessindexforstatesinmalaysiaapaneldataanalysis
AT tuanlonikkuazam constructingacompetitivenessindexforstatesinmalaysiaapaneldataanalysis
AT adamradziah constructingacompetitivenessindexforstatesinmalaysiaapaneldataanalysis