Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review

As Blockchain projects gain popularity among developers, the number of patched codes rapidly increases. With such growth, it is difficult for the few committers to maintain it in a timely manner. Subsequently, the community is always in search of new committers. This highlights the imperative import...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abd Wahab, Alawiyah, Ibrahim, Huda, SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29909/1/JICT%2022%2004%202023%20675-706.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2023.22.4.6
_version_ 1825806080153747456
author Abd Wahab, Alawiyah
Ibrahim, Huda
SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami
author_facet Abd Wahab, Alawiyah
Ibrahim, Huda
SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami
author_sort Abd Wahab, Alawiyah
collection UUM
description As Blockchain projects gain popularity among developers, the number of patched codes rapidly increases. With such growth, it is difficult for the few committers to maintain it in a timely manner. Subsequently, the community is always in search of new committers. This highlights the imperative importance of committer assessment decisions towards the success of Blockchain. However, the practices come with risks whereby new committers may harm the project. For example, a new committer may initiate a hard fork that splits a project. Numerous systematic literature reviews have investigated developer turnover’s impact on open-source software (OSS) projects. These studies mainly focused on aspects such as community participation, engagement, and motivation. However, previous reviews often overlooked committer assessment practices, particularly in the context of Blockchain projects. Although Blockchain operates as OSS, its distinct attributes, such as decentralisation and cryptography, justify the need for a dedicated review. Therefore, the objectives of this review are to 1) identify committer assessment practices, 2) identify problems in committer assessment, 3) identify existing factors in committer assessment, and 4) suggest some possible research topics. These goals were achieved through a systematic review of literature published between 2010 and 2022. The findings suggest that previous assessment models are useful but mainly focus on technical factors. The results also indicate that studies focusing on behavioural tendencies, which influence human activities, have so far been neglected. Finally, the paper concludes by charting potential open research opportunities.
first_indexed 2024-07-04T06:43:06Z
format Article
id uum-29909
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
language English
last_indexed 2024-07-04T06:43:06Z
publishDate 2023
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
record_format eprints
spelling uum-299092023-11-05T10:02:56Z https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29909/ Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review Abd Wahab, Alawiyah Ibrahim, Huda SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami T Technology (General) As Blockchain projects gain popularity among developers, the number of patched codes rapidly increases. With such growth, it is difficult for the few committers to maintain it in a timely manner. Subsequently, the community is always in search of new committers. This highlights the imperative importance of committer assessment decisions towards the success of Blockchain. However, the practices come with risks whereby new committers may harm the project. For example, a new committer may initiate a hard fork that splits a project. Numerous systematic literature reviews have investigated developer turnover’s impact on open-source software (OSS) projects. These studies mainly focused on aspects such as community participation, engagement, and motivation. However, previous reviews often overlooked committer assessment practices, particularly in the context of Blockchain projects. Although Blockchain operates as OSS, its distinct attributes, such as decentralisation and cryptography, justify the need for a dedicated review. Therefore, the objectives of this review are to 1) identify committer assessment practices, 2) identify problems in committer assessment, 3) identify existing factors in committer assessment, and 4) suggest some possible research topics. These goals were achieved through a systematic review of literature published between 2010 and 2022. The findings suggest that previous assessment models are useful but mainly focus on technical factors. The results also indicate that studies focusing on behavioural tendencies, which influence human activities, have so far been neglected. Finally, the paper concludes by charting potential open research opportunities. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2023 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en cc4_by https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29909/1/JICT%2022%2004%202023%20675-706.pdf Abd Wahab, Alawiyah and Ibrahim, Huda and SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami (2023) Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 22 (4). pp. 675-706. ISSN 2180-3862 https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/jict/article/view/19104 https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2023.22.4.6 https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2023.22.4.6
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
Abd Wahab, Alawiyah
Ibrahim, Huda
SarkinTudu, Shehu Malami
Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Committer Assessment Practice in Blockchain Project: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort committer assessment practice in blockchain project a systematic literature review
topic T Technology (General)
url https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/29909/1/JICT%2022%2004%202023%20675-706.pdf
https://doi.org/10.32890/jict2023.22.4.6
work_keys_str_mv AT abdwahabalawiyah committerassessmentpracticeinblockchainprojectasystematicliteraturereview
AT ibrahimhuda committerassessmentpracticeinblockchainprojectasystematicliteraturereview
AT sarkintudushehumalami committerassessmentpracticeinblockchainprojectasystematicliteraturereview