Showing 1 - 5 results of 5 for search '"commercial bank"', query time: 0.08s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Cost and profit efficiency of online banks: Do national commercial banks perform better than private banks? by Baten, Md Azizul, Mat Kasim, Maznah, Rahman, M.

    Published 2015
    “…This study employs the parametric approach, in particular the Stochastic Frontier Approach, to examine the cost and profit efficiency of National Commercial Banks and Private Banks in Bangladesh using stochastic frontier model.The cost inefficiency and profit efficiency are observed slightly higher for private banks than national commercial banks. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 2

    Evaluating advance efficiency of Bangladeshi online banks using stochastic frontier analysis by Baten, Md Azizul, Kamil, Anton Abdulbasah

    Published 2013
    “…The year wise average efficiency of banks was estimated (0.516) from the advance frontier model while group wise average technical efficiency was 0.592. Nationalized Commercial Bank had the highest advances producing group compared to others; Private Banks are at the lowest level in producing advances. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    Evaluation of online bank efficiency in Bangladesh: A Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach by Bhuia, Mohammad Romel, Baten, Md Azizul, Kamil, Anaton Abdulbasah

    Published 2012
    “…This study aims to examine the relative efficiency of Bangladesh online banks during 2001–2007 by utilizing Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA).Based on the several online sampled banks, the findings reveal that the most efficient banks were AL-Arafah Islami Bank Limited, Shahajalal Islami Bank Limited, Eastern Bank Limited, and the less efficient banks over the study period were Janata Bank Limited, Utara Bank Limited, United Commercial Bank Limited, Pubali Bank Limited, and AB Bank Limited.Among the three groups Group-1 (n=20), Group-2 (n=18), Group-3 (n=15) we observed that the individual efficiency level of banks are increasing group by group.The efficiency level of Group-2 was slightly increased from the efficiency level of Group-1.The source of efficiency of the sampled banks was found to be lower for technical efficiency and scale efficiency rather than pure technical efficiency.Moreover, the scale inefficiency was found lower in G-3 compare to G-1 and G-2.This indicated that the scale inefficiency was observed decreasing group by group and these were attributable to technical efficiency rather than pure technical inefficiency.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    Measuring online bank profit efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis by Baten, Md Azizul, Kamil, Anton Abdulbasah

    Published 2010
    “…This study proposed that Battese and Coelli (1995)[2] inefficiency model be applied as a framework in exploring the determinants of factors causing profit efficiency differential on banking industry in Bangladesh.Using stochastic frontier technique we examined the changes in the profit efficiency in accordance with Nationalized Commercial Banks, Islamic Banks, Foreign Banks and Private Banks and significant variations of efficiencies of banks for the period 2000 to 2007.The results showed that the profit inefficiency declined over the reference period and Translog Production Function is more preferable than Cobb-Douglas Production Function.Nationalized Commercial Banks are significantly inefficient and on the contrary ISBs, FBs, and PBs are efficient in producing profit and noteworthy.Year wise average efficiencies of banks from the profit efficiency model is 0.664 while group wise average profit efficiency is 0.639. …”
    Get full text
    Conference or Workshop Item
  5. 5

    Efficiency and productivity change of selected online banks in Bangladesh: A non-parametric Malmquist approach by Baten, Md Azizul, Mat Kasim, Maznah

    Published 2015
    “…This study evaluated the technical efficiency change and productivity change of national commercial banks (NCBs) and private banks (PBs) by employing cost data envelopment analysis (DEA), profit DEA and Malmquist based DEA.The cost inefficiency and profit efficiency are observed slightly higher for PBs than NCBs.The average technical and allocative efficiency are found 75.4% and 35.9% respectively by cost DEA; while 74.0% and 31.8% for profit DEA.By profit DEA, on an average bank-wise and year-wise productivity change, efficiency change and technical efficiency change are found higher than cost DEA.The average cost and average profit efficiency is observed 28.7% and 24.2% respectively.Bank-wise average productivity change and technical efficiency change are decreased at 4.2% and 5.1% respectively whereas the efficiency change is increased at 0.9% in profit DEA. …”
    Get full text
    Article