Test-retest reliability of scotopic and mesopic fundus-controlled perimetry using a modified MAIA (macular integrity assessment) in normal eyes by Pfau, M, Lindner, M, Fleckenstein, M, Finger, R, Rubin, G, Harmening, W, Morales, M, Holz, F, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…PURPOSE: To assess the intrasession test-retest reliability of scotopic cyan and scotopic red fundus-controlled perimetry (FCP) in normal subjects using a modified MAIA "microperimeter" (macular integrity assessment) device. …”

Mesopic and dark-adapted two-color fundus-controlled perimetry in patients with cuticular, reticular, and soft drusen by Pfau, M, Lindner, M, Gliem, M, Steinberg, JS, Thiele, S, Finger, RP, Fleckenstein, M, Holz, FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…</p> <p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> Mean deviation values for eyes with cuticular, soft, and reticular drusen were similar for mesopic (-2.1, -3.4, and -3.6 dB) and dark-adapted red (-1.4, -2.6, and -3.3 dB) FCP. For the dark-adapted cyan FCP (0.1, -1.9, and -5.0 dB) and for the cyan-red sensitivity difference (+1.0, +0.5, and -2.4 dB), the mean deviation values differed significantly in dependence of the predominant drusen type (one-way ANOVA; p &lt; 0.05). …”

Determinants of cone- and rod-function in geographic atrophy: AI-based structure-function correlation by Pfau, M, von der Emde, L, Dysli, C, Möller, PT, Thiele, S, Lindner, M, Schmid, M, Rubin, DL, Fleckenstein, M, Holz, FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…</p> <p><strong>Results</strong> Retinal sensitivity was predicted with a MAE of 4.64 dB for mesopic, 4.89 dB for DA cyan and 4.40 dB for DA red testing in absence of patient-specific data. …”

Artificial intelligence for morphology-based function prediction in neovascular age-related macular degeneration by von der Emde, L, Pfau, M, Dysli, C, Thiele, S, Möller, PT, Lindner, M, Schmid, M, Fleckenstein, M, Holz, FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…With patient-wise leave-one-out cross-validation, we have been able to achieve prediction accuracies of (mean absolute error, MAE [95% CI]) 3.94 dB [3.38, 4.5] for mesopic, 4.93 dB [4.59, 5.27] for DA cyan and 4.02 dB [3.63, 4.42] for DA red testing. …”

Light sensitivity within areas of geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration by Pfau, M, von der Emde, L, Dysli, C, Thiele, S, Möller, PT, Lindner, M, Nadal, J, Schmid, M, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S, Holz, FG, Fleckenstein, M

“…</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> Mesopic and dark-adapted (DA) cyan and red light sensitivity (Goldmann III) were investigated using fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry). …”

Mesopic and dark-adapted two-color fundus-controlled perimetry in geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration by Pfau, M, Müller, PL, von der Emde, L, Lindner, M, Möller, PT, Fleckenstein, M, Holz, FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…The grids were used for duplicate mesopic and dark-adapted two-color (cyan and red) fundus-controlled perimetry. Age-adjusted reference-data were obtained through regression analysis of normative data followed by spatial interpolation.…”

Visual field indices and patterns of visual field deficits in mesopic and dark-adapted two-colour fundus-controlled perimetry in macular diseases by Pfau, M, Lindner, M, Steinberg, JS, Thiele, S, Brinkmann, CK, Fleckenstein, M, Holz, FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg, S

“…</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong>&nbsp;The intrasession reproducibility was lower for the mean defect as compared with the mean deviation (CoR (dB) 2.67 vs 2.57 for mesopic, 1.71 vs 1.45 for dark-adapted cyan, 1.94 vs 1.87 for dark-adapted red testing) and lower for the square-root loss variance as compared with the PSD (CoR (dB) 1.48 vs 1.34, 0.77 vs 0.65, 1.23 vs 1.03). …”