Incidence and Management of Epithelial-Related Complications After SMILE by Moshirfar M, Zhang S, Pandya S, Stoakes IM, Hoopes PC

“…State St., Ste. 200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA, Tel +1 801-568-0200, Fax +1 801-563-0200, Email cornea2020@me.comPurpose: To investigate the incidence and management of only epithelial-related complications following small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).Patients and Methods: A retrospective, single-site study analyzed patients who underwent SMILE at Hoopes Vision Clinic in Draper, Utah, from June 2017 to February 2023. …”
Get full text

Photorefractive Keratectomy Enhancement (PRK) After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) by Moshirfar M, Parsons MT, Chartrand NA, Lau CK, Stapley S, Bundogji N, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes PC

Subjects: Get full text

Correlational Analysis of the Effective Optical Zone with Myopia, Myopic Astigmatism, and Spherical Equivalent in LASIK, PRK, and SMILE by Moshirfar M, Herron MS, Cha DS, Santos JM, Miller LT, Hoopes PC Sr

“…#200, Draper, UT, 84020, USA, Tel\Fax +1 801-568-0200, Email cornea2020@me.comPurpose: We assess the relationship between preoperative myopic sphere, astigmatism, and spherical equivalent and effective optical zone (EOZ) size, shape, and decentration within individual populations of post-LASIK, PRK, and SMILE patients.Patients and Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted with 118 LASIK, 144 PRK, and 41 SMILE eyes from 179 total patients that underwent compound myopic ablation. …”
Get full text

Comparison of Corneal Power Difference Maps with Achieved Myopic Correction Using Scheimpflug Tomography After LASIK, PRK, and SMILE by Moshirfar M, Harvey DH, Wang Q, Payne CJ, West DG, Hoopes PC

“…There was good correlation and agreement for all three surgery groups, LASIK: r = 0.975, LoA − 0.83D to +0.83D, PRK: r = 0.96, LoA − 0.83D and +0.95D, and SMILE: r = 0.922, LoA − 0.97 D to +0.99D.Conclusion: TNP ∆maps most accurately measured corneal power in the LASIK and PRK groups while TCRP ∆maps were most accurate in the SMILE group. …”
Get full text

Influence of Preoperative Parameters on the Ratio of Keratometric Change per Diopter of Attempted Spherical Equivalent (∆K/∆SEQ) for Myopic Correction Within LASIK, PRK, and SMILE by Moshirfar M, Theis JS, Cha DS, Porter KB, Payne CJ, Hoopes PC

“…Only patients who achieved emmetropia at a visual acuity of 20/25 or better were included.Results: The mean ΔK/ΔSEQ ratio for LASIK (0.839 ± 0.020) was significantly greater than that of PRK (0.775 ± 0.022) and SMILE (0.709 ± 0.046). Age was found to negatively correlate with ΔK/ΔSEQ for both LASIK (r = − 0.177) and SMILE (r = − 0.451) procedures. …”
Get full text

The Combined Utilization of Epithelial Thickness Mapping and Tomography in Keratorefractive Surgery Screening: One Imaging Modality is Not Sufficient by Corbin WM, Payne CJ, Momeni-Moghaddam H, Ronquillo YC, Hoopes Snr PC, Moshirfar M

Subjects: Get full text

Review of Presbyopia Treatment with Corneal Inlays and New Developments by Moshirfar M, Henrie MK, Payne CJ, Ply BK, Ronquillo YC, Linn SH, Hoopes PC

Subjects: Get full text