Emphasis should be placed on identifying and reporting research priorities to increase research value: An empirical analysis. by Yicheng Gao, Zhihan Liu, Rui Cao, Yingdi Liao, Yuting Feng, Chengyuan Su, Xinmiao Guan, Rui Fang, Yingjie Deng, Wenyuan Xiang, Junchang Liu, Yuanyuan Li, Yutong Fei

“…<h4>Objectives</h4>To compared the presentation of research priorities in the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) developed under the guidance of the GRADE working group or its two co-chair, and the Chinese CPGs.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a methodological empirical analysis. …”
Get full text

Comprehensive consideration of multiple determinants from evidence to recommendations in guidelines for most traditional Chinese medicine was suboptimal: a systematic review by Yi-Cheng Gao, Rui Cao, Zhi-Han Liu, Ying-Di Liao, Li-Yuan Tao, Yu-Ting Feng, Qian-Yun Chai, Min-Jing Luo, Yu-Tong Fei

“…The GRADE CPGs were identified as the guidelines developed by the GRADE Working Group or the two Co-Chairs. For the TCM CPGs, we randomly selected guidelines that were published by the TCM or integrative medicine academic societies from China mainland (published by the TCM or integrative medicine academic societies of China mainland). …”
Get full text