-
1
WFDE5: bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis data for impact studies
Published 2020-09-01Get full text
Article -
2
Explicit Rate Adjustment (ERA): Responsiveness, Network Utilization Efficiency and Fairness for Layered Multicast
Published 2005-08-01“…To provide layered multicast with responsiveness, efficiency in network utilization, scalability and fairness (including inter-protocol fairness, intra-protocol fairness, intra-session fairness and TCP-friendliness) for layered multicast, we propose in this paper a new multicast congestion control, called Explicit Rate Adjustment (ERA). Our protocol uses an algorithm relying on TCP throughput equation and Packet-bunch Probe techniques to detect optimal bandwidth utilization; then adjusts the reception rate accordingly. …”
Get full text
Article -
3
Using ERA-Interim reanalysis for creating datasets of energy-relevant climate variables
Published 2017-07-01“…Here we modify the parameters of different distributions (depending on the variable), adjusting ERA-Interim based on gridded station or direct station observations. …”
Get full text
Article -
4
Estimates of the Land Surface Hydrology from the Community Land Model Version 5 (CLM5) with Three Meteorological Forcing Datasets over China
Published 2024-01-01“…In this study, three offline LSM simulations were conducted over China using the Community Land Model version 5.0 (CLM5) driven by different meteorological forcing datasets, namely China Meteorological Forcing Dataset (CMFD), Global Soil Wetness Project Phase 3 (GSWP3), and bias-adjusted ERA5 reanalysis (WFDE5), respectively. Both gridded and in situ reference data, including evapotranspiration (ET), soil moisture (SM), and runoff, were employed to evaluate the performance levels of three CLM5-based simulations across China and its ten basins. …”
Get full text
Article -
5
Market Reform, Programmatic (De)Alignment and Party System Stability in Latin America
Published 2013-07-01“…Market reforms that were adopted by conservative leaders and opposed by a major leftist rival aligned party systems programmatically, allowing societal opposition to be channeled into institutionalized forms of competition that were highly stable in the post-adjustment era. By contrast, «bait-and-switch» reforms adopted by populist or leftist leaders were programmatically de-aligning for party systems, leaving them vulnerable to highly destabilizing reactive sequences in the aftermath to the reform process-including mass social protests, the demise of historic conservative parties, and the outflanking of traditional populist or leftist parties by more radical, anti-neoliberal outsiders. …”
Get full text
Article -
6
Temporal Trends in Hemoglobin, Use of Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents, and Major Clinical Outcomes in Incident Dialysis Patients in Canada
Published 2021-04-01“…After multivariable adjustment, Era 3 (2013–2015) was associated with an 8% relative risk reduction in the primary outcome compared with Era 1 (2007–2009) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–0.96), a 10% relative reduction in mortality (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85–0.94) but no significant change in AMI or stroke. …”
Get full text
Article -
7
Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol in Advanced and Recurrent Rectal Cancer Patients after beyond Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery: A Feasibility Study
Published 2023-09-01“…Total compliance with the adjusted ERAS protocol was 73.6%. Major complications were present in 12 patients (16.7%), and the median length of hospital stay was 9 days (IQR 6.0–14.0). …”
Get full text
Article -
8
Reforma de mercado, (des)alineamiento programático y estabilidad del sistema de partidos en América Latina Market Reform, Programmatic (De)Alignment and Party System Stability in L...
Published 2013-07-01“…Market reforms that were adopted by conservative leaders and opposed by a major leftist rival aligned party systems programmatically, allowing societal opposition to be channeled into institutionalized forms of competition that were highly stable in the post-adjustment era. By contrast, «bait-and-switch» reforms adopted by populist or leftist leaders were programmatically de-aligning for party systems, leaving them vulnerable to highly destabilizing reactive sequences in the aftermath to the reform process-including mass social protests, the demise of historic conservative parties, and the outflanking of traditional populist or leftist parties by more radical, anti-neoliberal outsiders. …”
Get full text
Article