Showing 41 - 60 results of 6,905 for search '"Argument"', query time: 0.06s Refine Results
  1. 41
  2. 42

    Differential argument realization in Abui by Kratochvil, Frantisek

    Published 2014
    “…This paper discusses differential argument realization in Abui, a Papuan language (Eastern Indonesia) with semantic alignment (in terms of Donohue and Wichmann 2008; Kratochvíl 2011). …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  3. 43

    Succinct non-subsequence arguments by Ling, San, Tang, Khai Hanh, Vu, Khu, Wang, Huaxiong, Yan, Yingfei

    Published 2024
    “…Lookup arguments have recently attracted a lot of developments due to their applications in the constructions of succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs). …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    Conference Paper
  4. 44
  5. 45
  6. 46

    A naturalist cosmological argument by Leftow, B

    Published 2017
    “…I rebut a “naturalist” counter to Swinburne’s Bayesian cosmological argument, based on the supposedly superior simplicity of naturalism.…”
    Journal article
  7. 47

    In defense of the argument for emotional assent by Dunkley Smith, M

    Published 2018
    “…This paper defends the argument that the irrationality of recalcitrant emotions can only be explained by understanding emotions as yielding a distinctly nonjudgmental assent. …”
    Journal article
  8. 48

    Are spectrum arguments defused by vagueness? by Thomas, J

    Published 2021
    “…I consider paradoxical spectrum arguments involving transitive relations like ‘better than’. …”
    Journal article
  9. 49
  10. 50

    Evolutionary debunking arguments in ethics by Mogensen, A

    Published 2014
    “…By considering the most prominent arguments in the literature today, I offer reasons to think that debunking arguments of this kind fail. …”
    Thesis
  11. 51

    Intrapersonal arguments for the Repugnant Conclusion by Francis, T

    Published 2023
    “…In “An Intrapersonal Addition Paradox”, Jacob Nebel provides a novel “intrapersonal” argument for the Repugnant Conclusion. The most controversial premise of Nebel’s argument is the “Probable Addition Principle”, on which it is better for individuals to receive additional chances of existence with a life worth living. …”
    Journal article
  12. 52

    Gwiazda on the bayesian argument for god by Swinburne, R

    Published 2010
    “… <p style="text-align:justify;">Jeremy Gwiazda made two criticisms of my formulation in terms of Bayes’s theorem of my probabilistic argument for the existence of God. The first criticism depends on his assumption that I claim that the intrinsic probabilities of all propositions depend almost entirely on their simplicity; however, my claim is that that holds only insofar as those propositions are explanatory hypotheses. …”
    Journal article
  13. 53

    Testing the national identity argument by Miller, D, Ali, S

    Published 2013
    “…The national identity argument holds that a shared national identity is necessary to motivate citizens in democratic societies to pursue a number of goals, especially social justice. …”
    Journal article
  14. 54
  15. 55

    Dominic Scott: Levels of argument by Nielsen, K

    Published 2016
    “…Dominic Scott’s Levels of Argument examines Plato’s Republic and Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics from a comparative methodological perspective. …”
    Journal article
  16. 56

    On the mathematics and metaphysics of the hole argument by Pooley, O, Read, J

    Published 2021
    “…We make some remarks on the mathematics and metaphysics of the hole argument, in response to a recent article in this journal by Weatherall ([2018]). …”
    Journal article
  17. 57

    Fitch's Argument and Typing Knowledge. by Paseau, A

    Published 2008
    “…Fitch's argument purports to show that if all truths are knowable then all truths are known. …”
    Journal article
  18. 58
  19. 59
  20. 60

    The argument from almost indiscernibles by Rodriguez-Pereyra, G

    Published 2016
    “…What I call the argument from almost indiscernibles is an argument, put forward by Robert Adams in 1979, for the possibility of indiscernibles based on the possibility of almost indiscernibles. …”
    Journal article