Showing 1 - 4 results of 4 for search '"Barisal District"', query time: 0.22s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Field Investigation on Sub-clinical Mastitis in Cows in Different areas of Barisal district in Bangladesh by Mirza Mienur Meher, Aliul Hasan, Marya Afrin

    Published 2018-09-01
    “…This study was redacted to estimate the present status of SCM in cow in selective area of Barisal district. For determining sub-clinical mastitis, a total of 152 milk samples of clinically suspected cows were subjected to White Side Test (WST) and Surf Field Mastitis Test (SFMT). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 2

    A new species of Euphlyctis (Anura: Dicroglossidae) from Barisal, Bangladesh. by Mohammad Sajid Ali Howlader, Abhilash Nair, Sujith V Gopalan, Juha Merilä

    Published 2015-01-01
    “…A new species of the genus Euphlyctis is described from the Barisal district of Bangladesh and compared with its morphologically similar and geographically proximate congeners. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    Knowledge and implementation behavior towards mitigation initiatives of climate change: Community settings approach of Bangladesh context followed cross-sectional design. by Bilkis Banu, Nasrin Akter, Nusrat Hossain Sheba, Sujana Haque Chowdhury

    Published 2024-01-01
    “…It was an analytical type of cross-sectional study which was conducted among 450 adult people residing in Barisal district of Bangladesh. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using semi-structured questionnaire included socio-demographic information, knowledge and implementation behavior regarding mitigation initiatives towards climate change. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    Severe malnutrition in infants aged <6 months—Outcomes and risk factors in Bangladesh: A prospective cohort study by Munirul Islam, M, Arafat, Y, Connell, N, Mothabbir, G, McGrath, M, Berkley, J, Ahmed, T, Kerac, M

    Published 2018
    “…We conducted a prospective cohort study in infants u6m in Barisal district, Bangladesh. One group of 77 infants had SAM (weight‐for‐length Z‐score [WLZ] <−3 and/or bipedal oedema); 77 others were “non‐SAM” (WLZ ≥−2 to <+2, no oedema, mid‐upper‐arm circumference ≥125 mm). …”
    Journal article