Showing 101 - 120 results of 189 for search '"Geomagic"', query time: 0.12s Refine Results
  1. 101

    Volumetric estimation of an intensive apple orchard with GIS by P. Riczu, É. Bozsik, B. Gálya, J. Rásó, I. Csiha, A. M. El Shal, J. Nyéki, J. Tamás

    Published 2013-07-01
    “…Two rows of the study area were surveyed, where the height and stem diameter of apple trees were measured with Geomagic Studio 12 GIS Demo Software. Based on the built-in algorithms, the volume of each tree were defined by the software. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 102

    Characteristic changes of the palatal rugae following orthodontic treatment by Nazanin Ziar, Hamid Reza Pakshir, Yasaman Alamdarloo, Shabnam Ajami

    Published 2023-03-01
    “…Before and after orthodontic treatment dental casts of 30 patients were scanned by 3Shape Trios 3D intraoral scanner, and superimposed in Geomagic X 2018 software. Displacement of 13 reference points was analyzed in three dimensions. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 103

    Comparative Verification of the Accuracy of Implant Models Made of PLA, Resin, and Silicone by Kana Wakamori, Koudai Nagata, Toshifumi Nakashizu, Hayato Tsuruoka, Mihoko Atsumi, Hiromasa Kawana

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…The base model was then used as a reference, and its data were superimposed onto the STL data of each model using Geomagic control. The horizontal and vertical accuracies of PLA models, as calculated using the Tukey–Kramer method, were 97.2 ± 48.4 and 115.5 ± 15.1 μm, respectively, which suggests that the PLA model is the least accurate among the three models. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 104

    Comparative analysis for five fixations of Pauwels-I by the biomechanical finite-element method by Matthew Jian-Qiao Peng, Hai-Yan Chen, XiangYang Ju, Yong Hu, Ashraf Ayoub, Balvinder Khambay, ZiQing Liu, Bo Bai

    Published 2020-05-01
    “…Method: Twenty sets of computer tomography scanned femora were imported onto Mimics to extract 3 D models; these specimens were transferred to Geomagic-Studio for a simulative osteotomy and kyrtograph; then, they underwent UG to fit simulative solid models; 5 sorts of fixture were then expressed by Pro-Engineer virtually. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 105

    Topography and Morphometrics of the Cartilage Surfaces in the Peritalar Joints by Aditya Kumar, Jessica Oudakker BA, Mingjie Zhu DAOM, MPH, Robyn M. Pierce MS, Stephen Wittels MD, Caley M. Orr PhD, Kenneth Hunt MD, Mark Myerson BA. BSoc. Sc, MD, Shuyuan Li MD, PhD

    Published 2023-12-01
    “…Further digital analysis was completed using GeoMagic Studio 10. T-test was used for statistical comparisons, with p< 0.05 as statistically significantly different. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 106

    Investigation of pelvic symmetry: A systematic analysis using computer aided design software by Qiubao Zheng, Kangshuai Xu, Xiaorui Zhan, Fuming Huang, Liping Wang, Sheqiang Chen, Jiacheng Li, Cheng Yang, Yuhui Chen, Shicai Fan

    Published 2023-02-01
    “…Then, the reflected left side model was aligned with the right side using the closest point algorithm function of Geomagic software to perform symmetry analysis. The volume and surface area of either side of the pelvises were also calculated. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 107

    Congruency of the TN Joint and Subtalar Joint Middle Facet Under With and Without Weightbearing: A Preliminary Report by Stephen Wittels MD, Mingjie Zhu DAOM MPH, Mark Myerson MD, Shuyuan Li MD, PhD

    Published 2024-04-01
    “…Congruency of the restored talonavicular joint and subtalar middle facet was evaluated in the GeoMagic. The total articular surface area for each bone was reconstructed, calculated and recorded. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 108

    The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners by Judit Schmalzl, Ivett Róth, Judit Borbély, Péter Hermann, Bálint Vecsei

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…The scanners were used eight times; STL files were imported into Geomagic Control X for accuracy assessment by comparing them to a reference data set created by an industrial high-precision scanner (AICON SmartScan-3D C5). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 109

    Influence of cement-augmented pedicle screw instrumentation in an osteoporotic lumbosacral spine over the adjacent segments: a 3D finite element study by Quan-kun Zhou, Fan-hui Zeng, Jian-long Tu, Zhang-qing Dong, Zhi-Hui Ding

    Published 2020-04-01
    “…Methods A normal male volunteer without a history of spinal disease was selected, lumbar CT data was collected, an intact L3-S1 three-dimensional finite element model was created by software including Mimics, Geomagic, and SolidWorks, and the fixation methods were performed accordingly. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 110

    New technique of producing removable complete denture using rapid tooling approach by Kassim, Noraniah

    Published 2012
    “…The scanned surface was refined using the Geomagic Studio 10 and then converted to IGES format for CAD application. …”
    Get full text
    Thesis
  11. 111

    Stereolithography vs. Direct Light Processing for Rapid Manufacturing of Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Accuracy Analysis by Alexey Unkovskiy, Franziska Schmidt, Florian Beuer, Ping Li, Sebastian Spintzyk, Pablo Kraemer Fernandez

    Published 2021-03-01
    “…The dentures were digitalized using a laboratory scanner (D2000, 3Shape) and analyzed in analyzing software (Geomagic Control X, 3D systems). Differences between 3D datasets were measured using the root mean square (RMS) value for trueness and precision and mean and maximum deviations were obtained for each denture base. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 112

    Effect of miniscrew placement height on the distribution of biological forces produced by clear aligner for mandibular molar distalization by WANG Songqing, KANG Fujia, YUAN Jiamin, ZHU Xianchun

    Published 2024-03-01
    “…Objective To explore the effect of different miniscrew placement heights on the distribution of biological forces produced by clear aligner combined with intramaxillary traction for mandibular molar distalization, to identify the miniscrew location that is conducive to the protection of lower anterior tooth anchorage and to provide a reference that can be used when designing clinical treatments. Methods Mimics, GeomagicStudio 2017, SolidWorks 2016, and Ansys workbench were used to establish finite element analysis models and perform mechanical analysis under the following six working conditions: working condition 1 was the control group without miniscrews; working conditions 2 to 5 had miniscrew in the buccal bone cortex between the first and second molars of the lower jaw 10 mm, 7 mm, 4 mm, and 1 mm from the top of the alveolar crest, respectively; working condition 6 had the miniscrew in the center of the buccal tongue at the anterior edge of the ascending branch of the lower jaw 5 mm above the occlusal plane. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 113

    Additive Manufacturing of Lithium Disilicate with the LCM Process for Classic and Non-Prep Veneers: Preliminary Technical and Clinical Case Experience by Alexey Unkovskiy, Florian Beuer, Dilan Seda Metin, Daniel Bomze, Jeremias Hey, Franziska Schmidt

    Published 2022-09-01
    “…The applied restorations were analyzed in terms of their marginal fit in metrology software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). Furthermore, the feasibility of 3D printing of non-prep veneers with a 0.1 mm thickness was tested. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 114

    A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows by Daehee Jang, Keunbada Son, Kyu-bok Lee

    Published 2019-07-01
    “…The fitness of the fabricated 3-unit FDPs was evaluated by scanning the silicone replica of the cement space and analyzing the thickness of the silicone replica in the three-dimensional (3D) inspection software (Geomagic control X). The trueness of the milling unit was analyzed by 3D analysis of the CAD reference model, which is the design file of the 3-unit FDP, and the CAD test model, which is the scanned file of the 3-unit FDP. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 115

    Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: effect of treatment design by Tommaso Castroflorio, Ambra Sedran, Simone Parrini, Francesco Garino, Matteo Reverdito, Riccardo Capuozzo, Sabrina Mutinelli, Simonas Grybauskas, Mantas Vaitiekūnas, Andrea Deregibus

    Published 2023-01-01
    “…Post-treatment digital models and final virtual treatment plan models were exported from ClinCheck® software as STL files and subsequently imported into Geomagic Qualify ®software, to compare final teeth positions. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 116

    Estimating biological sex and stature from the humerus: A pilot study using a contemporary Australian sub-population using computed tomography by Kristy A. Winter, Clair Alston-Knox, Matthew Meredith, Donna MacGregor

    Published 2021-11-01
    “…Plane-to-plane and point-to-point anthropometric measurements were performed in reverse engineering program, Geomagic Design X® (3D Systems Inc., USA). Five standard measurements of the humerus (maximum humeral length, vertical diameter of the humeral head, epicondyle breadth, maximum and minimum mid-shaft diameter) were assessed. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 117

    Effect of wall thickness of 3D‐printed models on resisting deformation from thermal forming in‐office aligners by Gregory W. Bennett, Tia DiGiovanni

    Published 2024-02-01
    “…Each aligner's data was then compared to the original file used for printing with 3D comparison software (Geomagic Control X, 3D Systems). Results The results show model thickness greater than or equal to 2.0 mm produced clinically acceptable results within the margin of error (0.3 mm). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 118

    Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters by Asher Chiu, Yen-Wei Chen, Juri Hayashi, Alireza Sadr

    Published 2020-02-01
    “…Comparative 3D analysis of scans was performed with Geomagic Control X software to measure the discrepancy between intraoral scans and the control scan along the preparation finish line. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 119

    Accuracy of tooth‐implant impressions: Comparison of five different techniques by Amirhossein Fathi, Mansour Rismanchian, Atousa Yazdekhasti, Masih Salamati

    Published 2023-06-01
    “…The scan file of each technique was compared with the scan file of the original acrylic model by Geomagic Design X software. Data were analyzed by one‐way analysis of variance, and Tamhane's post‐hoc test (α = 0.05). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 120

    Optimum design of reference points distribution in three-dimensional reconstruction of dental model in intercuspal position by Yujia Wu, Zhewen Hu, Xinyue Zhang, Hefei Bai, Yuchun Sun, Baolin Fan

    Published 2021-11-01
    “…Assessing the reference points from each of the seven groups performed the 3D construction. The Geomagic Studio software was used to construct the concaves of digital casts, and the distances D M between the pairs of concaves were measured as test values. …”
    Get full text
    Article