-
1
The Effects Of Jasper Jumper-Occıpıtal Headgear And Actıvator-Occıpıtal Headgear On Dentofacıal Structures
Published 1997-04-01“…Treament time in the jasper jumper-occipital headgear group was significantly less than the activator occipital headgear group.…”
Get full text
Article -
2
The Skeletal Effects Of Frankel 2 (Fr2) And Headgear Applıances On Class Iı, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıon
Published 1993-11-01“…In FR2 group the average chronological age was 9.72± 1.07 years old; in headgear group 9.87± 0.72 years old and in control group 9.92± 0.91 years old. …”
Get full text
Article -
3
The Cephalometrıc Evaluatıon Of Dental And Soft Tıssue Effects Of Frankel 2 (Fr2) And Headgear Applıances On Class Iı, Dıvısıon 1 Malocclusıon
Published 1992-11-01“…Comparing with the headgear group, this tilting effect was more in FR2 group. …”
Get full text
Article -
4
Changes Occured In The Mandıbular Morphology Durıng The Treatment Of Class Iı Dıvısıon 1 Cases Wıth Cervıcal Headgear
Published 1990-11-01“…This study was performed with the purpose to investigate the changes especially in such regions as the condyle and the ramus of the mandible that could be the causes of alterations in the mandibular growth pattern during the treatment of skeletal and dental Angle class II division 1 malocclusions with cervical headgear. Cervical headgear group was consisted of ten subjects. with a mean age of 9.020 ± 1.28 years where 10 subjects with a mean age of 9.456 ± 0.28 years served as controls. …”
Get full text
Article -
5
Dıstalızatıon Of Upper Fırst Molar Wıth Open-Coıl Jıg Applıance
Published 1996-11-01“…In the open-coil jig group, the upper first molars are distalized faster and more when compared with the headgear group within average of 2 months. The axial inclinations of second premolars and central incisors are increaed in open-coil jig group when compared with heagdear group.…”
Get full text
Article