Showing 1 - 20 results of 43 for search '"Psychonomic Society"', query time: 0.13s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    The automatic and the expected self: Separating self- and familiarity biases effects by manipulating stimulus probability by Sui, J, Sun, Y, Peng, K, Humphreys, G

    Published 2014
    “…In contrast, biases to high-familiarity stimuli (mother pairs) can be reduced when the items occur infrequently and they do not dominate expectations over other high-frequency stimuli. © 2014 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  6. 6

    HETERONYMS AND POLYPHONES - CATEGORIES OF WORDS WITH MULTIPLE PHONEMIC REPRESENTATIONS by Martin, M, Jones, G, Nelson, D, Nelson, L

    Published 1981
    “…These are words with different pronunciations that are not associated with different meanings. © 1981 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    Parameterization of connectionist models. by Bogacz, R, Cohen, J

    Published 2004
    “…The method has been implemented in Matlab, is fully documented, and is available for free download from the Psychonomic Society Web archive at www.psychonomic.org/archive/.…”
    Journal article
  10. 10

    LOCAL AND GLOBAL PROCESSING - ROLE OF SPARSITY by Martin, M

    Published 1979
    “…The results of four experiments were consistent in demonstrating global processing priority for many-lement stimuli but local processing priority for few-element stimuli. © 1979 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  11. 11

    MEMORY SPAN AS A MEASURE OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN MEMORY CAPACITY by Martin, M

    Published 1978
    “…Thus it was concluded that an individual's digit span reflects his ability to retain information about the order of a sequence of events rather than the capacity of his short- or long-term memory. © 1978 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  12. 12

    SPEECH RECODING IN SILENT READING by Martin, M

    Published 1978
    “…The relationship between individual differences in Stroop performance and those in reading speed and in personality (as assessed by the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire) were also examined. © 1978 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  13. 13

    RECALL CUED BY SELECTIVELY ATTENDED AND UNATTENDED ATTRIBUTES by Jones, G, Martin, M

    Published 1980
    “…Thus, observed effects of categorization appear to be sensitive to minor differences in experimental procedure between studies. © 1980 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  14. 14

    HEMISPHERE DIFFERENCES IN AUDITORY STROOP TEST by Cohen, G, Martin, M

    Published 1975
    “…The result is interpreted as reflecting hemispheric specialization for linguistic and nonlinguistic processing and a model of Stroop conflict in which response competition varies with the relative availability of the conflicting response. © 1975 Psychonomic Society, Inc.…”
    Journal article
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20