-
201
Methodology of the SORENTO clinical trial: a prospective, randomised, active-controlled phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy and safety of high exposure octreotide subcutaneous dep...
Published 2024-01-01“…Upon confirmation of disease progression (determined by a Blinded Independent Review Committee [BIRC] and defined as per RECIST 1.1), patients may enter an open-label extension treatment period with once weekly dosing, to investigate the effects of higher frequency dosing. …”
Get full text
Article -
202
A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory
Published 2017-05-01“…Data on feedback characteristics, underlying theoretical domains, effect size and risk of bias were extracted by two independent review authors, who determined the domains within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). …”
Get full text
Article -
203
FREQUENCY OF DIAGNOSTIC CONCORDANCE IN CORE BREAST BIOPSIES OF CATEGORY B3 AND B4 AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE
Published 2021-02-01“…The selected cases were anonymized and distributed among 3 pathologists for independent review. The participating pathologists were kept unaware of the findings given by fellow participants and previously agreed reference diagnoses. …”
Get full text
Article -
204
Clinician consensus on “Inappropriate” presentations to the Emergency Department in the Better Data, Better Planning (BDBP) census: a cross-sectional multi-centre study of emergenc...
Published 2023-09-01“…In cases where consensus was not reached charts were assessed by an Independent Review Panel (IRP). At each site all files were autonomously assessed by local GP-EMC panels. …”
Get full text
Article -
205
Systematic Process to Determine Clinical Harm From Delayed Communication Between Primary and Secondary Healthcare
Published 2022-06-01“…There were 367 deaths, and an independent review revealed that no deaths were linked to the nonreceipt of the letter. …”
Get full text
Article -
206
Treatment of relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma with the BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib: phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study
Published 2020-05-01“…The primary endpoint was overall response rate as assessed by an independent review committee. Results Of the 91 evaluable patients, 77 (84.6%) achieved a response, with three (3.3%), 54 (59.3%), and 20 (22%) patients achieving a complete response, partial response, and partial response with lymphocytosis, respectively, after a median follow-up of 15.1 months. …”
Get full text
Article -
207
Advance Statements for Black African and Caribbean people (AdStAC): protocol for an implementation study
Published 2023-05-01“…Abstract Background The UK government committed to legislating for Advance Choice Documents/Advance Statements (ACD/AS) following their recommendation by the Independent Review of the MHA (2018). ACDs/AS are yet to be implemented in routine practice despite evidence and high demand; they are associated with improved therapeutic relationships and a reduction (25%, RR 0.75, CI 0.61–0.93) in compulsory psychiatric admission. …”
Get full text
Article -
208
Multicenter diagnostic evaluation of a Novel Coronavirus Antigen Lateral Flow Test among symptomatic individuals in Brazil and the United Kingdom
Published 2022“…Thus, there is now a need for a transparent evaluation of Ag-RDTs with both analytical and clinical evaluation. We present an independent review of the Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoV Antigen Test (Colloidal Gold) (Beijing Hotgen Biotech Co., Ltd.), at two sites within Brazil and one in the United Kingdom.…”
Journal article -
209
First-line erlotinib versus gemcitabine/cisplatin in patients with advancedEGFRmutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: analyses from the phase III, randomized, open-label, EN...
Published 2015“…Investigator-assessed median PFS was 11.0 months versus 5.5 months, erlotinib versus GP, respectively [hazard ratio (HR), 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.51; log-rank P < 0.0001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed median PFS was consistent (HR, 0.42). …”
Article -
210
Identification of HMGA2 as a predictive biomarker of response to bintrafusp alfa in a phase 1 trial in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer
Published 2022-12-01“…The primary objective was confirmed best overall response by RECIST 1.1 assessed per independent review committee (IRC).ResultsAs of May 15, 2020, a total of 33 patients had received bintrafusp alfa, for a median of 6.0 (range, 2.0-48.1) weeks. …”
Get full text
Article -
211
Hypersensitivity reactions, hepatotoxicity, and other discontinuations in persons receiving integrase strand transfer inhibitors: results from the EuroSIDA study
Published 2021-12-01“…Conclusion: During 5 years of observations in the EuroSIDA cohort independently reviewed discontinuations due to HSR or hepatotoxicity were very rare, indicating a low rate of SAEs.…”
Get full text
Article -
212
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis
Published 2020-09-01“…There were 7 liver-related deaths, and based on independent review by a hepatologist, 1 of these deaths may have been attributable to SBRT-related liver injury. …”
Get full text
Article -
213
ISATUXIMAB PLUS CARFILZOMIB AND DEXAMETHASONE IN PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA AND SOFT-TISSUE PLASMACYTOMAS: IKEMA SUBGROUP ANALYSIS
Published 2021-11-01“…Doses: Isa: 10 mg/kg IV QW for 4 weeks, then Q2W; K 20 mg/m² days 1–2, then 56 mg/m² twice-weekly 3 of 4 weeks; d: 20 mg twice-weekly. Independent review committee assessed response based on central radiology review and central lab M-protein using International Myeloma Working Group criteria. …”
Get full text
Article -
214
SG-APSIC1035: Prospective safety surveillance study of ACAM2000 smallpox vaccine in deployed military personnel
Published 2023-02-01“…Study participants with evidence, either clinical or laboratory, of possible myopericarditis were referred to a blinded independent review committee for further evaluation and adjudication. …”
Get full text
Article -
215
XENERA-1: a randomised double-blind Phase II trial of xentuzumab in combination with everolimus and exemestane versus everolimus and exemestane in patients with hormone receptor-po...
Published 2023-06-01“…The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review. Results A total of 103 patients were randomised and 101 were treated (n = 50 in the xentuzumab arm and n = 51 in the placebo arm). …”
Get full text
Article -
216
Digital and online symptom checkers and assessment services for urgent care to inform a new digital platform: a systematic review
Published 2019-08-01“…Objectives: This systematic review was commissioned to provide NHS England with an independent review of previous research in this area to inform strategic decision-making and service design. …”
Get full text
Article -
217
Low‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel versus standard‐dose gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in elderly patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: A randomized Phase II trial...
Published 2023-09-01“…The response rate (36.7% vs 33.3%) and progression‐free survival (7.3 vs 8 months) were comparable between the low‐ and standard‐dose groups as determined by independent review. The difference in the median overall survival between the two groups was not significant (7.9 vs 12 months). …”
Get full text
Article -
218
Application of a Novel 68Ga-HER2 Affibody PET/CT Imaging in Breast Cancer Patients
Published 2022-05-01“…All available images for each patient were evaluated through an independent review of two committee-certified radiologists with nuclear medicine expertise. …”
Get full text
Article -
219
Phase III double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar MYL-1402O and reference bevacizumab in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer
Published 2021-11-01“…The primary objective was comparison of overall response rate (ORR), based on independently reviewed best tumor responses as assessed during the first 18 weeks. …”
Get full text
Article -
220
A Protocol for the Use of Case Reports/Studies and Case Series in Systematic Reviews for Clinical Toxicology
Published 2021-09-01“…The risk of bias, quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations will be assessed by two independent review teams that are blinded to each other.Conclusion: This is a protocol specified for systematic reviews that use case reports/studies and case series to evaluate the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in disciplines like clinical toxicology, where case reports/studies are the norm.…”
Get full text
Article