Showing 161 - 180 results of 4,114 for search '"The Independent Review"', query time: 0.31s Refine Results
  1. 161
  2. 162

    Qualitative inquiry with persons with obesity about weight management in primary care and referrals by Lisa Bailey-Davis, Lisa Bailey-Davis, Angela Marinilli Pinto, David J. Hanna, Michelle I. Cardel, Chad D. Rethorst, Kelsey Matta, Christopher D. Still, Christopher D. Still, Gary D. Foster, Gary D. Foster

    Published 2023-08-01
    “…Audiotape transcripts, interviewer notes, and independent review of data by two investigators allowed for data and investigator triangulation. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 163

    A structured, journal-led peer-review mentoring program enhances peer review training by Ariel Maia Lyons-Warren, Whitley W. Aamodt, Kathleen M. Pieper, Roy E. Strowd

    Published 2024-03-01
    “…Mentees reported improved perception of review (median (IQR) pre = 4 (3–4), post = 5 (4–5)) and editorial processes (pre = 3 (2–4), post = 4 (4–5)) as well as self-perceived confidence in completing an independent review of both scientific (median (IQR) pre = 2 (2–3), post = 4 (4–4)) and non-scientific (pre = 3 (2–4), post = 4 (4–5)) manuscripts following program participation. p < 0.0001 for all scores noted. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 164
  5. 165

    Ultrasound core laboratory for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network trial: standardized training and image management for field studies using portable ultrasound in fet... by Dávila-Román, VG, Toenjes, AK, Meyers, RM, Lenzen, PM, Simkovich, SM, Herrera, P, Fung, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Craik, R, McCracken, JP, Thompson, LM, Balakrishnan, K, Rosa, G, Peel, J, Clasen, TF, Hossen, S, Checkley, W, Fuentes, LDL

    Published 2021
    “…Ultrasound Core Laboratories (UCL) are used in multicenter trials to assess imaging biomarkers to define robust phenotypes, to reduce imaging variability and to allow blinded independent review with the purpose of optimizing endpoint measurement precision. …”
    Journal article
  6. 166
  7. 167

    Adverse Events Reporting of Clinical Trials in Exercise Oncology Research (ADVANCE): Protocol for a Scoping Review by Hao Luo, Hao Luo, Oliver Schumacher, Oliver Schumacher, Daniel A. Galvão, Daniel A. Galvão, Robert U. Newton, Robert U. Newton, Dennis R. Taaffe, Dennis R. Taaffe

    Published 2022-02-01
    “…Six electronic databases (Embase, PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science Core Collection, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL Plus) will be searched for studies. Two independent review authors will assess eligibility of identified studies, chart data using pre-established extraction forms, and evaluate adequacy of reporting of AEs-related data against a 20-item scoring checklist derived from the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) harms extension. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 168

    Using a standalone ear-EEG device for focal-onset seizure detection by McGregor Joyner, Sheng-Hsiou Hsu, Stephanie Martin, Jennifer Dwyer, Denise Fay Chen, Reza Sameni, Samuel H. Waters, Konstantin Borodin, Gari D. Clifford, Allan I. Levey, John Hixson, Daniel Winkel, Jonathan Berent

    Published 2024-02-01
    “…Results In a blinded, independent review of the ear-EEG signals, two epileptologists were able to detect 86.4% of the seizures that were subsequently identified using the clinical gold standard EEG modalities, with a false detection rate of 0.1 per day, well below what has been reported for ambulatory monitoring. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 169
  10. 170

    Detecting the Effects of Deep-Seabed Nodule Mining: Simulations Using Megafaunal Data From the Clarion-Clipperton Zone by Jeff A. Ardron, Jeff A. Ardron, Erik Simon-Lledó, Daniel O. B. Jones, Henry A. Ruhl, Henry A. Ruhl

    Published 2019-10-01
    “…Monitoring details, data, and results including power analyses should be made fully available, to facilitate independent review and informed policy discussions.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 171
  12. 172

    Oral care for intensive care unit patients without mechanical ventilation: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis by Xiaoxia Tang, Yunxia Shen, Xuejiao Pan, Jianglong Liao, Yanfei Xu, Wen Luo, Xiaolin Zhang, Chun’e Li, Qing Wan, Xin Cai, Xiaomei Zhang, Tao Wang, Guilan Zhang

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…All literature will be selected following pre-established inclusion criteria by two independent review authors to obtain quality trials. The quality of the included records will be evaluated according to the “risk of bias table”, recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 173

    Identity development, attraction, and behaviour of heterosexually identified men who have sex with men: scoping review protocol by Andrew D. Eaton, Travis R. Scheadler, Cara Bradley, Lauren B. McInroy, Oliver W. J. Beer, Erin Beckwell, Adam Busch, Paul A. Shuper

    Published 2023-09-01
    “…Thematic content analysis will guide the review; through independent review and reviewer meetings, themes and subthemes will be identified and reported from the extracted literature. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 174

    AI as a Medical Device for Ophthalmic Imaging in Europe, Australia, and the United States: Protocol for a Systematic Scoping Review of Regulated Devices by Ariel Yuhan Ong, Henry David Jeffry Hogg, Aditya U Kale, Priyal Taribagil, Ashley Kras, Eliot Dow, Trystan Macdonald, Xiaoxuan Liu, Pearse A Keane, Alastair K Denniston

    Published 2024-03-01
    “…Preliminary regulatory database searches, evidence searches, screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment will be undertaken by 2 independent review authors and arbitrated by a third at each stage of the process. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 175

    Nationwide incidence of sarcomas and connective tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy over four years using an expert pathology review network. by Gonzague de Pinieux, Marie Karanian, Francois Le Loarer, Sophie Le Guellec, Sylvie Chabaud, Philippe Terrier, Corinne Bouvier, Maxime Batistella, Agnès Neuville, Yves-Marie Robin, Jean-Francois Emile, Anne Moreau, Frederique Larousserie, Agnes Leroux, Nathalie Stock, Marick Lae, Francoise Collin, Nicolas Weinbreck, Sebastien Aubert, Florence Mishellany, Celine Charon-Barra, Sabrina Croce, Laurent Doucet, Isabelle Quintin-Rouet, Marie-Christine Chateau, Celine Bazille, Isabelle Valo, Bruno Chetaille, Nicolas Ortonne, Anne Brouchet, Philippe Rochaix, Anne Demuret, Jean-Pierre Ghnassia, Lenaig Mescam, Nicolas Macagno, Isabelle Birtwisle-Peyrottes, Christophe Delfour, Emilie Angot, Isabelle Pommepuy, Dominique Ranchere, Claire Chemin-Airiau, Myriam Jean-Denis, Yohan Fayet, Jean-Baptiste Courrèges, Nouria Mesli, Juliane Berchoud, Maud Toulmonde, Antoine Italiano, Axel Le Cesne, Nicolas Penel, Francoise Ducimetiere, Francois Gouin, Jean-Michel Coindre, Jean-Yves Blay, NetSarc/RePPS/ResSos and French Sarcoma Group- Groupe d’Etude des Tumeurs Osseuses (GSF-GETO) networks

    Published 2021-01-01
    “…<h4>Methods</h4>The nationwide incidence of sarcoma or TIM (2013-2016) was measured using the 2013 WHO classification and confirmed by a second independent review by expert pathologists. Simple clinical characteristics, yearly variations and correlation of incidence with published clinical trials are presented and analyzed.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 176

    Challenges and proposed solutions in making clinical research on COVID-19 ethical: a status quo analysis across German research ethics committees by Alice Faust, Anna Sierawska, Katharina Krüger, Anne Wisgalla, Joerg Hasford, Daniel Strech

    Published 2021-07-01
    “…For the review of these proposals the RECs indicated a broad spectrum of challenges regarding (1) social value (e.g. lack of coordination), (2) scientific validity (e.g. provisional study planning), (3) favourable risk–benefit ratio (e.g. difficult benefit assessment), (4) informed consent (e.g. strict isolation measures), (5) independent review (e.g. lack of time), (6) fair selection of trial participants (e.g. inclusion of vulnerable groups), and (7) respect for study participants (e.g. data security). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 177

    Evaluation of methods for assigning causes of death from verbal autopsies in India by Sudhir K. Benara, Saurabh Sharma, Atul Juneja, Saritha Nair, B. K. Gulati, Kh. Jitenkumar Singh, Lucky Singh, Ved Prakash Yadav, Chalapati Rao, M. Vishnu Vardhana Rao

    Published 2023-08-01
    “…PCVA methodology involved dual independent review with adjudication, where required. Metrics to assess performance were Cause Specific Mortality Fraction (CSMF), sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), CSMF Accuracy, and Kappa statistic.ResultsIn terms of the measures of the overall performance of COD assignment methods, for CSMF Accuracy, the PCVA method achieved the highest score of 0.79, followed by 0.67 for Tariff_2.0, 0.66 for Inter-VA and 0.62 for InSilicoVA. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 178
  19. 179

    Pregabalin for acute and chronic pain in adults. by Moore, R, Straube, S, Wiffen, P, Derry, S, McQuay, H

    Published 2009
    “…DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two independent review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality. …”
    Journal article
  20. 180

    A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory by Tuti, T, Nzinga, J, Njoroge, M, Brown, B, Peek, N, English, M, Paton, C, van der Veer, S

    Published 2017
    “…Data on feedback characteristics, underlying theoretical domains, effect size and risk of bias were extracted by two independent review authors, who determined the domains within the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). …”
    Journal article