-
1
The Sure-Thing Principle
Published 2016-03-01“…In 1954, Jim Savage introduced the Sure Thing Principle to demonstrate that preferences among actions could constitute an axiomatic basis for a Bayesian foundation of statistical inference. …”
Get full text
Article -
2
The Sure-Thing Principle
Published 2023“…The Sure-Thing Principle famously appears in Savage’s axiomatization of Subjective Expected Utility. …”
Journal article -
3
-
4
Sure-thing vs. probabilistic charitable giving: Experimental evidence on the role of individual differences in risky and ambiguous charitable decision-making.
Published 2022-01-01“…In this paper, we investigate what best explains charitable giving behaviour regarding charities that have interventions that will succeed with a quantifiable and high probability (sure-thing charities) and charities that have interventions that only have a small and hard to quantify probability of bringing about the desired end (probabilistic charities). …”
Get full text
Article -
5
Formalizing heuristics in decision making: a quantum probability perspective
Published 2011-11-01Subjects: Get full text
Article -
6
Quantum-Like Bayesian Networks for Modeling Decision Making
Published 2016-01-01Subjects: Get full text
Article -
7
-
8
Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect
Published 2017-05-01“…Two experiments examined moral judgments about a decision-maker’s choices when he chose a sure-thing, 400 out of 600 people will be saved, or a risk, a two-thirds probability to save everyone and a one-thirds probability to save no-one. …”
Get full text
Article -
9
Moral judgments of risky choices: A moral echoing effect
Published 2017-05-01“…Two experiments examined moral judgments about a decision-maker’s choices when he chose a sure-thing, 400 out of 600 people will be saved, or a risk, a two-thirds probability to save everyone and a one-thirds probability to save no-one. …”
Get full text
Article -
10
Counterfactuals in “agreeing to disagree” type results
Published 2016“…The new version of the Sure-Thing Principle introduced here, which accounts for beliefs at counterfactual states, is also shown to sit well with the intuition of the original version proposed by Savage (1972).…”
Journal article -
11
Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration
Published 2021-07-01“…PI activation also differentiated foveations on both risky options (rewards and losses) relative to a sure-thing option. These findings point to ACC involvement in ongoing evaluation of risky but higher value options. …”
Get full text
Article -
12
A Defence of the Cliché
Published 2008-05-01“…A sure thing is that clichés have a bad reputation. Trying to define the cliché as a linguistic or stylistic category, however, leads to all sorts of difficulties, as we seem to be dealing with “matters as imprecise as the shape and size of a cloud or the beginning and end of a wave”. …”
Get full text
Article -
13
Decision making under hypoxia: Oxygen depletion increases risk seeking for losses but not for gains
Published 2012-07-01“…For each choice they were forced to choose between a sure thing and a gamble of the same expected value. …”
Get full text
Article -
14
Adaptive Learning and Risk Taking
Published 2007“…He shows that a risk-neutral decision maker may learn to prefer a sure thing to an uncertain alternative with identical expected value and a symmetric distribution, even if the decision maker follows an optimal policy of learning. …”
Journal article -
15
A paradox for tiny probabilities and enormous values
Published 2023“…Reckless theories recommend giving up a sure thing, no matter how good, for an arbitrarily tiny chance of enormous gain; timid theories permit passing up an arbitrarily large potential gain to prevent a tiny increase in risk; non-transitive theories deny the principle that, if A is better than B and B is better than C, then A must be better than C. …”
Journal article -
16
Essays on information and networks
Published 2013“…This was done by isolating the relevant properties of conditional probabilities that drive the original result – namely, the “Sure-Thing Principle” and “like-mindedness” – and imposing them as conditions on the decision functions of agents. …”
Thesis -
17
-
18
Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect
Published 2008-08-01“…Using five variants of the Asian Disease Problem, we dissected the risky-choice framing effect by requiring each participant to provide preference ratings for the full decision problem and also to provide attractiveness ratings for each of the component parts, i.e., the sure-thing option and the risky option. Consistent with previous research, more risky choices were made by respondents receiving negatively framed versions of the decision problems than by those receiving positively framed versions. …”
Get full text
Article -
19
Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options
Published 2008-08-01“…Using five variants of the Asian Disease Problem, we dissected the risky-choice framing effect by requiring each participant to provide preference ratings for the full decision problem and also to provide attractiveness ratings for each of the component parts, i.e., the sure-thing option and the risky option. Consistent with previous research, more risky choices were made by respondents receiving negatively framed versions of the decision problems than by those receiving positively framed versions. …”
Get full text
Article -
20
Decision making under hypoxia: Oxygen depletion increases risk seeking for losses but not for gains
Published 2012-07-01“…For each choice they were forced to choose between a sure thing and a gamble of the same expected value. …”
Get full text
Article