Showing 1,601 - 1,620 results of 536,330 for search '"peer reviewed"', query time: 0.79s Refine Results
  1. 1601
  2. 1602
  3. 1603
  4. 1604
  5. 1605
  6. 1606
  7. 1607
  8. 1608
  9. 1609

    Quality monitoring of the accounting profession : are we ready for peer review? / Normah Omar, Mohd Johari AIwi and Zaini Ahmad by Omar, Normah, AIwi, Mohd Johari, Ahmad, Zaini

    Published 2003
    “…The potential of using peer review as a quality-monitoring tool has strong support amongst the locally established public practices.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 1610
  11. 1611
  12. 1612

    Peer reviewers identified spin in manuscripts of nonrandomized studies assessing therapeutic interventions, but their impact on spin in abstract conclusions was limited by Lazarus, C, Haneef, R, Ravaud, P, Hopewell, S, Altman, D, Boutron, I

    Published 2016
    “…Our aim was to describe the spin identified, deleted or added by peer reviewers in reports of non-randomized studies assessing a therapeutic intervention and to evaluate the prevalence of spin in the abstract conclusions that peer reviewers failed to identify.…”
    Journal article
  13. 1613

    Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Tephritidae) by Schutze, Mark K., Bourtzis, Kostas, Cameron, Stephen L., Clarke, Anthony R., Meyer, Marc De, Hee, Alvin K. W., Hendrichs, Jorge, Krosch, Matthew N., Mwatawala, Maulid

    Published 2017
    “…We recommend that taxonomic acts not subjected to peer review, especially of pest species, be actively discouraged by the broader scientific and regulatory community.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 1614

    Integrative taxonomy versus taxonomic authority without peer review: the case of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis(Tephritidae) by Schutze, Mark K., Bourtzis, Kostas, Cameron, Stephen L., Clarke, Anthony R., Meyer, Marc De, Hee, Alvin Kah Wei, Hendrichs, Jorge, Krosch, Matthew N., Mwatawala, Maulid

    Published 2017
    “…We recommend that taxonomic acts not subjected to peer review, especially of pestspecies, be actively discouraged by the broader scientific and regulatory community.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 1615
  16. 1616
  17. 1617
  18. 1618
  19. 1619
  20. 1620