The Scientist: Creator and Destroyer—“Scientists’ Warning to Humanity” Is a Wake-Up Call for Researchers by Marek Cuhra

Subjects: “…scientific skepticism…”
Get full text

'Emr-i bi’l-ma‘rûf nehy-i ‘ani’l-münker' Bağlamında Din Özgürlüğü Meselesi by Mustafa Barış

Subjects: Get full text

Revisiting Bakunin: Reflecting about the Pandemic by Dominik Kulcsár

“…Next I explain the nature of Bakunin’s scientific skepticism to show that he would consider the compliance with restrictions as a reasonable expression of freedom. …”
Get full text

How Can You Know the Bible and Not Believe in Our Lord? Guiding Pilgrims across the Jewish–Christian Divide by Jackie Feldman

“…I outline several faith interactions: Between reading the Bible as an affirmation of Christian faith or as a legitimation of Israeli heritage, between commitments to missionary Evangelical Christianity and to Judaism, between Evangelical practice and those of other Christian groups at holy sites, and between faith-based certainties and scientific skepticism. These encounters are both limited and enabled by the frames of the pilgrimage: The environmental bubble of the guided tour, the Christian orientations and activities in the itinerary, and the power relations of hosts and guests. …”
Get full text

Skepticism: Historical and logical forms and perspectives by Maslov, Vadim Mikhailovich

“…The quality of critical developments of skepticism, on the one hand, can strengthen the position of relativism and contribute to the growth of doubt in the world, on the other hand, leads to the formation of «methodological skepticism» – auxiliary tools for criticizing someone else and asserting one’s point of view (scientific skepticism). Conclusion. In the modern world, the importance of positively balanced and maximally justified partial skepticism is growing, the specifics of which is consonant with the emerging post-non-classical rationality.…”
Get full text

Critical Thinking, Intelligence, and Unsubstantiated Beliefs: An Integrative Review by D. Alan Bensley

“…They tend to be more scientifically skeptical and possess a more rational–analytic cognitive style, while those who accept unsubstantiated claims more tend to be more cynical and adopt a more intuitive–experiential cognitive style. …”
Get full text