Search alternatives:
fair » ftir (Expand Search)
fail » fall (Expand Search)
fare » face (Expand Search), care (Expand Search), rare (Expand Search)
fares » faces (Expand Search), cares (Expand Search), rares (Expand Search), faris (Expand Search), fires (Expand Search)
fared » faced (Expand Search), cared (Expand Search), rared (Expand Search), fareed (Expand Search), farid (Expand Search)
fars » faris (Expand Search), fairs (Expand Search), farsi (Expand Search)
farms » forms (Expand Search), firms (Expand Search), farm (Expand Search)
fair » ftir (Expand Search)
fail » fall (Expand Search)
fare » face (Expand Search), care (Expand Search), rare (Expand Search)
fares » faces (Expand Search), cares (Expand Search), rares (Expand Search), faris (Expand Search), fires (Expand Search)
fared » faced (Expand Search), cared (Expand Search), rared (Expand Search), fareed (Expand Search), farid (Expand Search)
fars » faris (Expand Search), fairs (Expand Search), farsi (Expand Search)
farms » forms (Expand Search), firms (Expand Search), farm (Expand Search)
-
501
Pick one, but be quick : 5' splice sites and the problems of too many choices
Published 2014Get full text
Get full text
Journal Article -
502
-
503
Small sample sizes reduce the replicability of task-based fMRI studies
Published 2020Get full text
Journal Article -
504
Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity : a cadaveric study using a rotation-meter
Published 2019“…Rotational forces of 3, 6 and 9 nm applied at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test. RESULTS : Total rotation recorded with the skin pointer significantly correlated with the bone marker at 3 nm at 0° (skin pointer 23.9 ± 26.0° vs bone marker 16.3 ± 17.3°, r = 0.92; P = 0.0), 30° (41.7 ± 15.5° vs 33.1 ± 14.7°, r = 0.63; P = 0.037), 45° (49.0 ± 17.0° vs 40.3 ± 11.2°, r = 0.81; P = 0.002), 60° (45.7 ± 17.5° vs 34.7 ± 9.5°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 90° (29.2 ± 10.9° vs 21.2 ± 6.8°, r = 0.69; P = 0.019) of knee flexion and 6 nm at 0° (51.1 ± 37.7° vs 38.6 ± 30.1°, r = 0.90; P = 0.0), 30° (64.6 ± 21.6° vs 54.3 ± 15.1°, r = 0.73; P = 0.011), 45° (67.7 ± 20.6° vs 55.5 ± 9.5°, r = 0.65; P = 0.029), 60° (62.9 ± 22.4° vs 45.8 ± 13.1°, r = 0.65; P = 0.031) and 90° (43.6 ± 17.6° vs 31.0 ± 6.3°, r = 0.62; P = 0.043) of knee flexion and at 9 nm at 0° (69.7 ± 40.0° vs 55.6 ± 30.6°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 60° (74.5 ± 27.6° vs 57.1 ± 11.5°, r = 0.77; P = 0.006). …”
Get full text
Get full text
Journal Article -
505
Lighting transfer across multiple views through local color transforms
Published 2018Get full text
Get full text
Journal Article -
506
How does voice matter? Evidence from the ultimatum game
Published 2013Get full text
Get full text
Journal Article -
507
-
508
A compact dual-polarized Vivaldi antenna with high gain for tree radar applications
Published 2024Get full text
Journal Article -
509
-
510
Investigating the influence of 3D mechanotransduction on porcine adipose-derived stem cells in a hydrogel system for cultivated meat
Published 2024Get full text
Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy -
511
-
512
Emergent semantic segmentation: training-free dense-label-free extraction from vision-language models
Published 2024Get full text
Thesis-Master by Research -
513
-
514
-
515
Gender Perspectives on Role Models: Insights from STEM Students and Professionals
Published 2024Get full text
Article -
516
Intentional creation of carbon-rich dark earth soils in the Amazon
Published 2024Get full text
Article -
517
Slip deficit in central Nepal: omen for a repeat of the 1344 AD earthquake?
Published 2016Get full text
Get full text
Journal Article -
518
-
519
Synthesizing photorealistic images with deep generative learning
Published 2021Get full text
Thesis-Doctor of Philosophy -
520
The impact of musical fit and sound design on consumers’ perception of a luxury car ad
Published 2023“…The results revealed that participants perceived the car’s power, driving excitement and engine technology to be highest when the ad was paired with sound effects. Meanwhile, participants perceived the car to be most elegant and indicated the highest price for the car when the ad was paired with classical music. …”
Journal article