Showing 181 - 200 results of 527 for search '((farr OR (fary OR carry)) OR (pair OR (pair OR fair))) 40', query time: 0.15s Refine Results
  1. 181

    Compact wideband wide-angle van atta retroreflector with suppressed structural mode by Yan, Libin, Shen, Zhongxiang

    Published 2022
    “…The proposed Van Atta retroreflector is composed of eight radiating elements interconnected in pairs with a planar feeding network of microstrip lines. …”
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  2. 182
  3. 183

    Minimally invasive neuromodulation using mechanically-sensitive ion channels and magnetically-actuated nanotransducers by Malkin, Elian

    Published 2024
    “…Calcium imaging results demonstrate that this method of nanotransducer targeting can elicit neuronal responses at 40mT even via endogenous ion channels, and that greater amplitudes of response can be achieved through mechanosensitive ion channel expression and increased stimulation strength. …”
    Get full text
    Thesis
  4. 184
  5. 185
  6. 186
  7. 187

    Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity : a cadaveric study using a rotation-meter by Puah, Ken Lee, Yew, Andy Khye Soon, Chou, Siaw Meng, Lie, Denny Tijauw Tjoen

    Published 2019
    “…Rotational forces of 3, 6 and 9 nm applied at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test. RESULTS : Total rotation recorded with the skin pointer significantly correlated with the bone marker at 3 nm at 0° (skin pointer 23.9 ± 26.0° vs bone marker 16.3 ± 17.3°, r = 0.92; P = 0.0), 30° (41.7 ± 15.5° vs 33.1 ± 14.7°, r = 0.63; P = 0.037), 45° (49.0 ± 17.0° vs 40.3 ± 11.2°, r = 0.81; P = 0.002), 60° (45.7 ± 17.5° vs 34.7 ± 9.5°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 90° (29.2 ± 10.9° vs 21.2 ± 6.8°, r = 0.69; P = 0.019) of knee flexion and 6 nm at 0° (51.1 ± 37.7° vs 38.6 ± 30.1°, r = 0.90; P = 0.0), 30° (64.6 ± 21.6° vs 54.3 ± 15.1°, r = 0.73; P = 0.011), 45° (67.7 ± 20.6° vs 55.5 ± 9.5°, r = 0.65; P = 0.029), 60° (62.9 ± 22.4° vs 45.8 ± 13.1°, r = 0.65; P = 0.031) and 90° (43.6 ± 17.6° vs 31.0 ± 6.3°, r = 0.62; P = 0.043) of knee flexion and at 9 nm at 0° (69.7 ± 40.0° vs 55.6 ± 30.6°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 60° (74.5 ± 27.6° vs 57.1 ± 11.5°, r = 0.77; P = 0.006). …”
    Get full text
    Get full text
    Journal Article
  8. 188
  9. 189
  10. 190
  11. 191
  12. 192
  13. 193
  14. 194
  15. 195
  16. 196
  17. 197
  18. 198
  19. 199
  20. 200