-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
The Political Enforcement of Liturgical Continuity in the Church of England 1558-1662
Published 2017-05-01Get full text
Article -
25
-
26
-
27
The Politics of Catholic versus Protestant and Understandings of Personal Affairs in Restoration Ireland
Published 2015-06-01“…The armies of Oliver Cromwell conquered Ireland and Catholic landowners were dispossessed and transplanted. The restoration of the Stuarts in 1660 opened up the prospect that these changes might be undone. …”
Get full text
Article -
28
-
29
-
30
Habitat Suitability Modeling to Inform Seascape Connectivity Conservation and Management
Published 2021-09-01Get full text
Article -
31
The PanOptix Trifocal IOL vs the ReSTOR 2.5 Active Focus and ReSTOR 3.0-Add Multifocal Lenses: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performa...
Published 2021-03-01“…John A Hovanesian,1 Michael Jones,2 Quentin Allen3 1Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USA; 2Quantum Vision Centers, Swansea, IL, USA; 3Florida Vision Institute, Stuart, FL, USACorrespondence: John A HovanesianHarvard Eye Associates, 23961 Calle De La Magdalena, #300, Laguna Hills, CA, 92653, USATel +1 949 951 2020Fax +1 949 951 9244Email jhovanesian@harvardeye.comPurpose: To compare spectacle independence, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and dysphotopsia after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation with the AcrySof PanOptix trifocal or the ReSTOR +2.5/3.0 D or ReSTOR +2.5 D mini-monovision multifocal IOL.Patients and Methods: Prospective, open-label, multicenter analysis of PROs, spectacle independence, and satisfaction among patients undergoing cataract surgery who had been implanted at least 1 month previously with AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal (n = 59) IOLs bilaterally. …”
Get full text
Article -
32
Mapping global forest regeneration–an untapped potential to mitigate climate change and biodiversity loss
Published 2023-01-01Get full text
Article -
33
The Vivity Extended Range of Vision IOL vs the PanOptix Trifocal, ReStor 2.5 Active Focus and ReStor 3.0 Multifocal Lenses: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbance...
Published 2022-01-01“…Results were compared to outcomes from two similar prospective studies of bilateral AcrySof IQ PanOptix or PanOptix Toric trifocal IOLs (n = 59), blended AcrySof ReSTOR 2.5/3.0 IOLs (n=72) or bilateral ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 D IOLs with a mini-monovision target [n = 95]).Results: Patients in the Vivity cohort were significantly less likely to notice glare and halo in dim light (85% “none” or “just a little”) compared to PanOptix (69%, p< 0.03), 2.5 mini-monovision (75%, p< 0.05) or 2.5/3.0 (71%, p< 0.05) patients. …”
Get full text
Article -
34
Tree species that ‘live slow, die older’ enhance tropical peat swamp restoration: evidence from a systematic review
Published 2022Get full text
Journal Article -
35
-
36
Winston Churchill’s <i>Divi Britannici</i> (1675) and Archipelagic Royalism
Published 2022-09-01“…What scholars have missed, however, is the propensity of Churchill to align the restored Stuart monarchy with a form of ethnic co-operation between Scotland, Ireland and England, designed to counter the perceived divisions which were exacerbated by the policies of Cromwell and the parliamentarians.…”
Get full text
Article -
37
-
38
Patient-Reported Outcomes/Satisfaction and Spectacle Independence with Blended or Bilateral Multifocal Intraocular Lenses in Cataract Surgery
Published 2019-12-01“…John A Hovanesian,1 Stephen S Lane,2 Quentin B Allen,3 Michael Jones4 1Harvard Eye Associates, Laguna Hills, CA, USA; 2Associated Eye Care, Stillwater, MN, USA; 3Florida Vision Institute, Stuart, FL, USA; 4Quantum Vision Centers, Swansea, IL, USACorrespondence: John A HovanesianHarvard Eye Associates, 24401 Calle De La Louisa, Laguna Hills, CA 92653, USATel +1 949 951 2020Fax +1 949 951 9244Email jhovanesian@harvardeye.comPurpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction results after multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in three groups: two receiving bilateral implantation of the same IOL and another undergoing blended vision with two different multifocal IOLs.Patients and methods: A questionnaire was administered to patients who had undergone uncomplicated cataract surgery and 2 months of follow-up: the first group underwent bilateral implantation with Alcon’s AcrySof ReSTOR 3.0 lens (“3.0/3.0,” n=78); the second group underwent implantation with the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 or the ReSTOR ActiveFocus 2.5 toric lens (“2.5 mini-monovision,” n=102); and the third group underwent implantation with the ReSTOR 2.5 lens in the dominant eye and the ReSTOR 3.0 lens in the non-dominant eye (“2.5/3.0,” n=89).Results: Overall PROs and satisfaction was similar among the groups. …”
Get full text
Article -
39
-
40