-
1
CFIUS post-Ralls: Ramifications for Sovereign Wealth Funds
Published 2015-03-01“…In a recent appellate court decision, Ralls v. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Ralls Corporation (a Chinese-owned and controlled company) had been deprived of its property without due process when the President (at the recommendation of CFIUS) ordered Ralls to divest its interests in certain US wind farm projects on national security grounds. …”
Get full text
Article -
2
CFIUS post-Ralls: Ramifications for Sovereign Wealth Funds
Published 2015-03-01“…In a recent appellate court decision, Ralls v. Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Ralls Corporation (a Chinese-owned and controlled company) had been deprived of its property without due process when the President (at the recommendation of CFIUS) ordered Ralls to divest its interests in certain US wind farm projects on national security grounds. …”
Get full text
Article -
3
-
4
Ruling by Bullying? - On the Difficult Balance between Illicit Threats and Effective Government
Published 2023-10-01“…On September 8th, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States partially upheld a decision that found several public officials had coerced social media companies into censoring speech protected by the First Amendment. …”
Get full text
Article -
5
Property as national security
Published 2024“…Simpson, is on appeal in the Eleventh Circuit and a focus of this Article.…”
Journal article -
6
Texas House Bill 2
Published 2015-01-01“…In 1992, the United States Supreme Court, in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. …”
Get full text
Article -
7
Marketing madness
Published 2020-03-01“…In Massachusetts, a court struck down an ordinance limiting tobacco advertising near schools, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals struck down part of a law governing colorful cigarette packaging. …”
Get full text
Article -
8
Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment Concerns with the BoP Guidelines for Advance Directives
Published 2020-02-01“…Arguing by analogy from the way that the cases of “committed mental patients” are handled, the Third Circuit Court stated that “convicted prisoners ... retain a limited right to refuse treatment and a related right to be informed of the proposed treatment and viable alternatives.” …”
Get full text
Article