Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant
In this paper, cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) – ethylene glycol (EG) + Water (W) based nanofluid was developed and assessed for their thermophysical properties and the usefulness towards machining performances. The nanofluid was prepared by adopting two-step preparation method and at volume concentrati...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/22282/1/Thermal%20analysis%20of%20cellulose%20nanocrystal-ethylene%20glycol%20nanofluid%20coolant.pdf |
| _version_ | 1825812268370100224 |
|---|---|
| author | Lingenthiran, Samylingam Keeran, Anamalai K., Kadirgama Samykano, Mahendran D., Ramasamy M. M., Noor G., Najafi M. M., Rahman Hong, Wei Xian Nor Azwadi, Che Sidik |
| author_facet | Lingenthiran, Samylingam Keeran, Anamalai K., Kadirgama Samykano, Mahendran D., Ramasamy M. M., Noor G., Najafi M. M., Rahman Hong, Wei Xian Nor Azwadi, Che Sidik |
| author_sort | Lingenthiran, Samylingam |
| collection | UMP |
| description | In this paper, cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) – ethylene glycol (EG) + Water (W) based nanofluid was developed and assessed for their thermophysical properties and the usefulness towards machining performances. The nanofluid was prepared by adopting two-step preparation method and at volume concentration of 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1.1%, 1.3% and 1.5%. The nanofluid with 1.3% and 1.5% concentration showed to have superior the conductivity properties, around 0.559 W/m·K at 70 °C. However, the 0.5% concentration has the highest stability with 0.52 W/m·K at 70 °C. The 0.5% nanofluid concentration was then selected for the machining performance evaluation. The machining performance was evaluated by using a lathe machining operation to determine the heat transfer and tool life properties. The cutting variables such as cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate are varied to understand the effect of developed nanofluid on the machining bahaviour. Findings revealed that the tool failure on machining using MWF is flank wear, chipping and abrasion and fractured at the maximum cutting distance of 500 mm. However, machining using CNC-EG+W nanofluid revealed the tool failure to be flank wear, adhesion and build- up-edge (BUE) and fractured at the maximum cutting distance of 772 mm. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:26:39Z |
| format | Article |
| id | UMPir22282 |
| institution | Universiti Malaysia Pahang |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-06T12:26:39Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | UMPir222822018-10-11T07:16:13Z http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/22282/ Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant Lingenthiran, Samylingam Keeran, Anamalai K., Kadirgama Samykano, Mahendran D., Ramasamy M. M., Noor G., Najafi M. M., Rahman Hong, Wei Xian Nor Azwadi, Che Sidik TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery In this paper, cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) – ethylene glycol (EG) + Water (W) based nanofluid was developed and assessed for their thermophysical properties and the usefulness towards machining performances. The nanofluid was prepared by adopting two-step preparation method and at volume concentration of 0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1.1%, 1.3% and 1.5%. The nanofluid with 1.3% and 1.5% concentration showed to have superior the conductivity properties, around 0.559 W/m·K at 70 °C. However, the 0.5% concentration has the highest stability with 0.52 W/m·K at 70 °C. The 0.5% nanofluid concentration was then selected for the machining performance evaluation. The machining performance was evaluated by using a lathe machining operation to determine the heat transfer and tool life properties. The cutting variables such as cutting speed, depth of cut and feed rate are varied to understand the effect of developed nanofluid on the machining bahaviour. Findings revealed that the tool failure on machining using MWF is flank wear, chipping and abrasion and fractured at the maximum cutting distance of 500 mm. However, machining using CNC-EG+W nanofluid revealed the tool failure to be flank wear, adhesion and build- up-edge (BUE) and fractured at the maximum cutting distance of 772 mm. Elsevier 2018 Article PeerReviewed pdf en http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/22282/1/Thermal%20analysis%20of%20cellulose%20nanocrystal-ethylene%20glycol%20nanofluid%20coolant.pdf Lingenthiran, Samylingam and Keeran, Anamalai and K., Kadirgama and Samykano, Mahendran and D., Ramasamy and M. M., Noor and G., Najafi and M. M., Rahman and Hong, Wei Xian and Nor Azwadi, Che Sidik (2018) Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 127. 173 - 181. ISSN 0017-9310. (Published) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.080 doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.07.080 |
| spellingShingle | TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Lingenthiran, Samylingam Keeran, Anamalai K., Kadirgama Samykano, Mahendran D., Ramasamy M. M., Noor G., Najafi M. M., Rahman Hong, Wei Xian Nor Azwadi, Che Sidik Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title | Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title_full | Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title_fullStr | Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title_full_unstemmed | Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title_short | Thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal-ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| title_sort | thermal analysis of cellulose nanocrystal ethylene glycol nanofluid coolant |
| topic | TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery |
| url | http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/22282/1/Thermal%20analysis%20of%20cellulose%20nanocrystal-ethylene%20glycol%20nanofluid%20coolant.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lingenthiransamylingam thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT keerananamalai thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT kkadirgama thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT samykanomahendran thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT dramasamy thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT mmnoor thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT gnajafi thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT mmrahman thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT hongweixian thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant AT norazwadichesidik thermalanalysisofcellulosenanocrystalethyleneglycolnanofluidcoolant |