Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research

Are We Replicating Yet? Reproduction and Replication in Communication Research

The replication crisis has highlighted the importance of reproducibility and replicability in the social and behavioral sciences, including in communication research. While there have been some discussions of and studies on replications in communication research, the extent of this work is significa...

Volledige beschrijving

Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteurs:	Johannes Breuer, Mario Haim
Formaat:	Artikel
Taal:	English
Gepubliceerd in:	Cogitatio 2024-06-01
Reeks:	Media and Communication
Onderwerpen:	communication research meta-science open science replicability reproducibility
Online toegang:	https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/8382

Gelijkaardige items

Remembering Reasons for Reform: A More Replicable and Reproducible Communication Literature Without the Rancor
door: James D. Ivory
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-03-01)

The Challenges of Replicating Volatile Platform-Data Studies: Replicating Schatto-Eckrodt et al. (2020)
door: Philipp Knöpfle, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-04-01)

Epidemiological characteristics and prevalence rates of research reproducibility across disciplines: A scoping review of articles published in 2018-2019
door: Kelly D Cobey, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2023-06-01)

The challenges of replication
Gepubliceerd in: (2017-01-01)

Making sense of replications
door: Brian A Nosek, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2017-01-01)

Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
door: Timothy M Errington, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-12-01)

The Replication Database: Documenting the Replicability of Psychological Science
door: Lukas Röseler, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-09-01)

Confounds in “Failed” Replications
door: Paola Bressan
Gepubliceerd in: (2019-09-01)

How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis
door: Sarah M Rajtmajer, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-08-01)

On the Continued Need for Replication in Media and Communication Research
door: Nicholas David Bowman
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-03-01)

Improving preclinical studies through replications
door: Natascha Ingrid Drude, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-01-01)

Replication Papers
door: Peter Harremoës
Gepubliceerd in: (2019-07-01)

Scoping review and evidence mapping of interventions aimed at improving reproducible and replicable science: Protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 3 approved with reservations]
door: Tony Ross-Hellauer, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-07-01)

Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines
door: Rima-Maria Rahal, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-11-01)

Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
door: Timothy M Errington, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-12-01)

What have we learned?
door: Peter Rodgers, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-12-01)

Replicability of Experiment
door: John D. Norton
Gepubliceerd in: (2015-06-01)

Rigour and reproducibility in Canadian research: call for a coordinated approach
door: Robert T. Thibault, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-01-01)

Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology
door: Hans E. Plesser, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2018-01-01)

The role of replication studies in ecology
door: Hannah Fraser, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2020-06-01)

Are Replications Mainstream now? A Comparison of Support for Replications Expressed in the Policies of Social Psychology Journals in 2015 and 2022
door: Ann-Kathrin Torka, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2023-11-01)

Direct Replication in Experimental Communication Science: A Conceptual and Practical Exploration
door: Ivar Vermeulen, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-06-01)

Reproducibility: A Researcher-Centered Definition
door: Sebastian Stefan Feger, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-02-01)

Replication marketplaces would help science to become more self-correcting
door: Joachim Hüffmeier, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-10-01)

An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research
door: Timothy M Errington, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2014-12-01)

The Challenges of Replicating Research on Endangered Species
door: Rachael C. Shaw, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-05-01)

Reproducibility and Replicability in SAR Remote Sensing
door: Timo Balz, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2020-01-01)

Next steps after airing disagreement on a scientific issue with policy implications: a meta-analysis, multi-lab replication and adversarial collaboration
door: Shinichi Nakagawa, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2023-05-01)

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative
door: Olavo B Amaral, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2019-02-01)

The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
door: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2021-04-01)

How to Improve the Reproducibility, Replicability, and Extensibility of Remote Sensing Research
door: Peter Kedron, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-10-01)

No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications
door: John Protzko, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2020-03-01)

Rinse and Repeat: Understanding the Value of Replication across Different Ways of Knowing
door: Bart Penders, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2019-07-01)

The puzzling relationship between multi-laboratory replications and meta-analyses of the published literature
door: Molly Lewis, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-02-01)

Centralized scientific communities are less likely to generate replicable results
door: Valentin Danchev, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2019-07-01)

Computational reproducibility in computational social science
door: David Schoch, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2024-12-01)

Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative
door: Nicolas P. Rougier, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2017-12-01)

Statistical Misconceptions, Awareness, and Attitudes towards Open Science Practices in Slovak Psychology Researchers
door: Jakub Rajčáni, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2023-03-01)

Quantity Over Quality? Reproducible Psychological Science from a Mixed Methods Perspective
door: Hollen N. Reischer, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2020-05-01)

A survey on how preregistration affects the research workflow: better science but more work
door: Alexandra Sarafoglou, et al.
Gepubliceerd in: (2022-07-01)