Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment

Abstract Background Cutaneous melanoma exhibits heterogeneous metastatic patterns and prognosis. In this regard, liver metastasis, which is detected in ~ 10–20% of stage 4 patients, came to the fore of melanoma research, as it recently evolved as decisive indicator of treatment resistance to immune...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian A. Wohlfeil, Verena Häfele, Bianca Dietsch, Céline Weller, Carsten Sticht, Anna Sophia Jauch, Manuel Winkler, Christian David Schmid, Anna Lena Irkens, Ana Olsavszky, Kai Schledzewski, Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch, Sergij Goerdt, Cyrill Géraud
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-02-01
Series:Journal of Translational Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03255-4
_version_ 1818500887798087680
author Sebastian A. Wohlfeil
Verena Häfele
Bianca Dietsch
Céline Weller
Carsten Sticht
Anna Sophia Jauch
Manuel Winkler
Christian David Schmid
Anna Lena Irkens
Ana Olsavszky
Kai Schledzewski
Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch
Sergij Goerdt
Cyrill Géraud
author_facet Sebastian A. Wohlfeil
Verena Häfele
Bianca Dietsch
Céline Weller
Carsten Sticht
Anna Sophia Jauch
Manuel Winkler
Christian David Schmid
Anna Lena Irkens
Ana Olsavszky
Kai Schledzewski
Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch
Sergij Goerdt
Cyrill Géraud
author_sort Sebastian A. Wohlfeil
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Cutaneous melanoma exhibits heterogeneous metastatic patterns and prognosis. In this regard, liver metastasis, which is detected in ~ 10–20% of stage 4 patients, came to the fore of melanoma research, as it recently evolved as decisive indicator of treatment resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition. Methods Hepatic metastases were induced by intrasplenic injection of five different murine melanoma cell lines. The efficiencies of hepatic colonization, morphologic patterns, gene expression profiles and degree of vascularization were analyzed and Sorafenib was applied as anti-angiogenic treatment. Results WT31 melanoma showed the highest efficiency of hepatic colonization, while intermediate efficiencies were observed for B16F10 and RET, and low efficiencies for D4M and HCmel12. RNAseq-based gene expression profiles of high and intermediate metastatic melanomas in comparison to low metastatic melanomas indicated that this efficiency predominantly associates with gene clusters involved in cell migration and angiogenesis. Indeed, heterogeneous vascularization patterns were found in the five models. Although the degree of vascularization of WT31 and B16F10 metastases differed, both showed a strong response to Sorafenib with a successful abrogation of the vascularization. Conclusion Our data indicate that molecular heterogeneity of melanomas can be associated with phenotypic and prognostic features of hepatic metastasis paving the way for organ-specific anti-angiogenic therapeutic approaches.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T20:48:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-01d951e23b144140b8554b9e1c7d0db6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1479-5876
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T20:48:45Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Translational Medicine
spelling doaj.art-01d951e23b144140b8554b9e1c7d0db62022-12-22T01:34:10ZengBMCJournal of Translational Medicine1479-58762022-02-0120111810.1186/s12967-022-03255-4Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatmentSebastian A. Wohlfeil0Verena Häfele1Bianca Dietsch2Céline Weller3Carsten Sticht4Anna Sophia Jauch5Manuel Winkler6Christian David Schmid7Anna Lena Irkens8Ana Olsavszky9Kai Schledzewski10Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch11Sergij Goerdt12Cyrill Géraud13Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyNGS Core Facility, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg UniversityDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, University Medical Center and Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, and Center of Excellence in DermatologyAbstract Background Cutaneous melanoma exhibits heterogeneous metastatic patterns and prognosis. In this regard, liver metastasis, which is detected in ~ 10–20% of stage 4 patients, came to the fore of melanoma research, as it recently evolved as decisive indicator of treatment resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition. Methods Hepatic metastases were induced by intrasplenic injection of five different murine melanoma cell lines. The efficiencies of hepatic colonization, morphologic patterns, gene expression profiles and degree of vascularization were analyzed and Sorafenib was applied as anti-angiogenic treatment. Results WT31 melanoma showed the highest efficiency of hepatic colonization, while intermediate efficiencies were observed for B16F10 and RET, and low efficiencies for D4M and HCmel12. RNAseq-based gene expression profiles of high and intermediate metastatic melanomas in comparison to low metastatic melanomas indicated that this efficiency predominantly associates with gene clusters involved in cell migration and angiogenesis. Indeed, heterogeneous vascularization patterns were found in the five models. Although the degree of vascularization of WT31 and B16F10 metastases differed, both showed a strong response to Sorafenib with a successful abrogation of the vascularization. Conclusion Our data indicate that molecular heterogeneity of melanomas can be associated with phenotypic and prognostic features of hepatic metastasis paving the way for organ-specific anti-angiogenic therapeutic approaches.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03255-4Cutaneous melanomaMelanoma metastasisLiver metastasisTumor heterogeneityAnti-angiogenesisSorafenib
spellingShingle Sebastian A. Wohlfeil
Verena Häfele
Bianca Dietsch
Céline Weller
Carsten Sticht
Anna Sophia Jauch
Manuel Winkler
Christian David Schmid
Anna Lena Irkens
Ana Olsavszky
Kai Schledzewski
Philipp-Sebastian Reiners-Koch
Sergij Goerdt
Cyrill Géraud
Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
Journal of Translational Medicine
Cutaneous melanoma
Melanoma metastasis
Liver metastasis
Tumor heterogeneity
Anti-angiogenesis
Sorafenib
title Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
title_full Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
title_fullStr Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
title_full_unstemmed Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
title_short Angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti-angiogenic treatment
title_sort angiogenic and molecular diversity determine hepatic melanoma metastasis and response to anti angiogenic treatment
topic Cutaneous melanoma
Melanoma metastasis
Liver metastasis
Tumor heterogeneity
Anti-angiogenesis
Sorafenib
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03255-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianawohlfeil angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT verenahafele angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT biancadietsch angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT celineweller angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT carstensticht angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT annasophiajauch angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT manuelwinkler angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT christiandavidschmid angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT annalenairkens angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT anaolsavszky angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT kaischledzewski angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT philippsebastianreinerskoch angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT sergijgoerdt angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment
AT cyrillgeraud angiogenicandmoleculardiversitydeterminehepaticmelanomametastasisandresponsetoantiangiogenictreatment