DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy

BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) represents a tremendous health threat to the world’s population. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment option for refractory MDD patients. Ample evidence suggests brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to play a crucial role in EC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicole Moschny, Kirsten Jahn, Malek Bajbouj, Hannah Benedictine Maier, Matthias Ballmaier, Abdul Qayyum Khan, Christoph Pollak, Stefan Bleich, Helge Frieling, Alexandra Neyazi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00571/full
_version_ 1818141984185909248
author Nicole Moschny
Nicole Moschny
Kirsten Jahn
Malek Bajbouj
Hannah Benedictine Maier
Matthias Ballmaier
Abdul Qayyum Khan
Christoph Pollak
Stefan Bleich
Stefan Bleich
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Alexandra Neyazi
Alexandra Neyazi
author_facet Nicole Moschny
Nicole Moschny
Kirsten Jahn
Malek Bajbouj
Hannah Benedictine Maier
Matthias Ballmaier
Abdul Qayyum Khan
Christoph Pollak
Stefan Bleich
Stefan Bleich
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Alexandra Neyazi
Alexandra Neyazi
author_sort Nicole Moschny
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) represents a tremendous health threat to the world’s population. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment option for refractory MDD patients. Ample evidence suggests brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to play a crucial role in ECT’s mode of action. Tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are involved in BDNF production.HypothesisThe DNA methylation of gene regions encoding for t-PA and PAI-1 might be a suitable biomarker for ECT response prediction.MethodsWe withdrew blood from two cohorts of treatment-resistant MDD patients receiving ECT. In the first cohort (n = 59), blood was collected at baseline only. To evaluate DNA methylation changes throughout the treatment course, we acquired a second group (n = 28) and took blood samples at multiple time points. DNA isolated from whole blood and defined immune cell subtypes (B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells, and T cells) served for epigenetic analyses.ResultsMixed linear models (corrected for multiple testing by Sidak’s post-hoc test) revealed (1) no detectable baseline blood DNA methylation differences between ECT remitters (n = 33) and non-remitters (n = 53) in the regions analyzed, but (2) a significant difference in t-PA’s DNA methylation between the investigated immune cell subtypes instead (p < 0.00001). This difference remained stable throughout the treatment course, showed no acute changes after ECT, and was independent of clinical remission.ConclusionDNA methylation of both proteins seems to play a minor role in ECT’s mechanisms. Generally, we recommend using defined immune cell subtypes (instead of whole blood only) for DNA methylation analyses.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:08:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-02b9033e0f3045738afc458aa153d9e7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-0640
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:08:33Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychiatry
spelling doaj.art-02b9033e0f3045738afc458aa153d9e72022-12-22T01:09:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402020-06-011110.3389/fpsyt.2020.00571512202DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive TherapyNicole Moschny0Nicole Moschny1Kirsten Jahn2Malek Bajbouj3Hannah Benedictine Maier4Matthias Ballmaier5Abdul Qayyum Khan6Christoph Pollak7Stefan Bleich8Stefan Bleich9Helge Frieling10Helge Frieling11Helge Frieling12Alexandra Neyazi13Alexandra Neyazi14Laboratory for Molecular Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover Graduate School for Veterinary Pathobiology, Neuroinfectiology, and Translational Medicine (HGNI), Hannover, GermanyLaboratory for Molecular Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyCell Sorting Core Facility, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyLaboratory for Molecular Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover Graduate School for Veterinary Pathobiology, Neuroinfectiology, and Translational Medicine (HGNI), Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyLaboratory for Molecular Neurosciences, Department of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover Graduate School for Veterinary Pathobiology, Neuroinfectiology, and Translational Medicine (HGNI), Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Hannover Graduate School for Veterinary Pathobiology, Neuroinfectiology, and Translational Medicine (HGNI), Hannover, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, GermanyBackgroundMajor depressive disorder (MDD) represents a tremendous health threat to the world’s population. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective treatment option for refractory MDD patients. Ample evidence suggests brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) to play a crucial role in ECT’s mode of action. Tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) are involved in BDNF production.HypothesisThe DNA methylation of gene regions encoding for t-PA and PAI-1 might be a suitable biomarker for ECT response prediction.MethodsWe withdrew blood from two cohorts of treatment-resistant MDD patients receiving ECT. In the first cohort (n = 59), blood was collected at baseline only. To evaluate DNA methylation changes throughout the treatment course, we acquired a second group (n = 28) and took blood samples at multiple time points. DNA isolated from whole blood and defined immune cell subtypes (B cells, monocytes, natural killer cells, and T cells) served for epigenetic analyses.ResultsMixed linear models (corrected for multiple testing by Sidak’s post-hoc test) revealed (1) no detectable baseline blood DNA methylation differences between ECT remitters (n = 33) and non-remitters (n = 53) in the regions analyzed, but (2) a significant difference in t-PA’s DNA methylation between the investigated immune cell subtypes instead (p < 0.00001). This difference remained stable throughout the treatment course, showed no acute changes after ECT, and was independent of clinical remission.ConclusionDNA methylation of both proteins seems to play a minor role in ECT’s mechanisms. Generally, we recommend using defined immune cell subtypes (instead of whole blood only) for DNA methylation analyses.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00571/fullbrain-derived neurotrophic factortissue-type plasminogen activatordepressionimmunologyDNA methylationelectroconvulsive therapy remission
spellingShingle Nicole Moschny
Nicole Moschny
Kirsten Jahn
Malek Bajbouj
Hannah Benedictine Maier
Matthias Ballmaier
Abdul Qayyum Khan
Christoph Pollak
Stefan Bleich
Stefan Bleich
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Helge Frieling
Alexandra Neyazi
Alexandra Neyazi
DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
Frontiers in Psychiatry
brain-derived neurotrophic factor
tissue-type plasminogen activator
depression
immunology
DNA methylation
electroconvulsive therapy remission
title DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
title_full DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
title_fullStr DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
title_full_unstemmed DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
title_short DNA Methylation of the t-PA Gene Differs Between Various Immune Cell Subtypes Isolated From Depressed Patients Receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy
title_sort dna methylation of the t pa gene differs between various immune cell subtypes isolated from depressed patients receiving electroconvulsive therapy
topic brain-derived neurotrophic factor
tissue-type plasminogen activator
depression
immunology
DNA methylation
electroconvulsive therapy remission
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00571/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolemoschny dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT nicolemoschny dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT kirstenjahn dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT malekbajbouj dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT hannahbenedictinemaier dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT matthiasballmaier dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT abdulqayyumkhan dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT christophpollak dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT stefanbleich dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT stefanbleich dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT helgefrieling dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT helgefrieling dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT helgefrieling dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT alexandraneyazi dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy
AT alexandraneyazi dnamethylationofthetpagenediffersbetweenvariousimmunecellsubtypesisolatedfromdepressedpatientsreceivingelectroconvulsivetherapy