Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults

We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance and predicted doses of a single-model approach or several multi-model approaches compared with the standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based vancomycin dosing. We performed a hospital-wide monocentric retrospective study in adult patients treate...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Heleen Gastmans, Erwin Dreesen, Sebastian G. Wicha, Nada Dia, Ellen Spreuwers, Annabel Dompas, Karel Allegaert, Stefanie Desmet, Katrien Lagrou, Willy E. Peetermans, Yves Debaveye, Isabel Spriet, Matthias Gijsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Pharmaceutics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/7/1459
_version_ 1797433154533851136
author Heleen Gastmans
Erwin Dreesen
Sebastian G. Wicha
Nada Dia
Ellen Spreuwers
Annabel Dompas
Karel Allegaert
Stefanie Desmet
Katrien Lagrou
Willy E. Peetermans
Yves Debaveye
Isabel Spriet
Matthias Gijsen
author_facet Heleen Gastmans
Erwin Dreesen
Sebastian G. Wicha
Nada Dia
Ellen Spreuwers
Annabel Dompas
Karel Allegaert
Stefanie Desmet
Katrien Lagrou
Willy E. Peetermans
Yves Debaveye
Isabel Spriet
Matthias Gijsen
author_sort Heleen Gastmans
collection DOAJ
description We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance and predicted doses of a single-model approach or several multi-model approaches compared with the standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based vancomycin dosing. We performed a hospital-wide monocentric retrospective study in adult patients treated with either intermittent or continuous vancomycin infusions. Each patient provided two randomly selected pairs of two consecutive vancomycin concentrations. A web-based precision dosing software, TDMx, was used to evaluate the model-based approaches. In total, 154 patients contributed 308 pairs. With standard TDM-based dosing, only 48.1% (148/308) of all of the second concentrations were within the therapeutic range. Across the model-based approaches we investigated, the mean relative bias and relative root mean square error varied from −5.36% to 3.18% and from 24.8% to 28.1%, respectively. The model averaging approach according to the squared prediction errors showed an acceptable bias and was the most precise. According to this approach, the median (interquartile range) differences between the model-predicted and prescribed doses, expressed as mg every 12 h, were 113 [−69; 427] mg, −70 [−208; 120], mg and 40 [−84; 197] mg in the case of subtherapeutic, supratherapeutic, and therapeutic exposure at the second concentration, respectively. These dose differences, along with poor target attainment, suggest a large window of opportunity for the model-based TDM compared with the standard TDM-based vancomycin dosing. Implementation studies of model-based TDM in routine care are warranted.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:13:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-03280ebdc630475d9ea33fa66a6fd5bb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4923
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:13:03Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmaceutics
spelling doaj.art-03280ebdc630475d9ea33fa66a6fd5bb2023-12-01T22:34:47ZengMDPI AGPharmaceutics1999-49232022-07-01147145910.3390/pharmaceutics14071459Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in AdultsHeleen Gastmans0Erwin Dreesen1Sebastian G. Wicha2Nada Dia3Ellen Spreuwers4Annabel Dompas5Karel Allegaert6Stefanie Desmet7Katrien Lagrou8Willy E. Peetermans9Yves Debaveye10Isabel Spriet11Matthias Gijsen12Pharmacy Department, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Hamburg, 20146 Hamburg, GermanyClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumPharmacy Department, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Information Technology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumClinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory of Clinical Bacteriology and Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory of Clinical Infectious and Inflammatory Disease, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumLaboratory for Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumPharmacy Department, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumPharmacy Department, UZ Leuven, 3000 Leuven, BelgiumWe aimed to evaluate the predictive performance and predicted doses of a single-model approach or several multi-model approaches compared with the standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based vancomycin dosing. We performed a hospital-wide monocentric retrospective study in adult patients treated with either intermittent or continuous vancomycin infusions. Each patient provided two randomly selected pairs of two consecutive vancomycin concentrations. A web-based precision dosing software, TDMx, was used to evaluate the model-based approaches. In total, 154 patients contributed 308 pairs. With standard TDM-based dosing, only 48.1% (148/308) of all of the second concentrations were within the therapeutic range. Across the model-based approaches we investigated, the mean relative bias and relative root mean square error varied from −5.36% to 3.18% and from 24.8% to 28.1%, respectively. The model averaging approach according to the squared prediction errors showed an acceptable bias and was the most precise. According to this approach, the median (interquartile range) differences between the model-predicted and prescribed doses, expressed as mg every 12 h, were 113 [−69; 427] mg, −70 [−208; 120], mg and 40 [−84; 197] mg in the case of subtherapeutic, supratherapeutic, and therapeutic exposure at the second concentration, respectively. These dose differences, along with poor target attainment, suggest a large window of opportunity for the model-based TDM compared with the standard TDM-based vancomycin dosing. Implementation studies of model-based TDM in routine care are warranted.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/7/1459vancomycintherapeutic drug monitoringpopulation pharmacokineticsprecision dosingpredictive performancemodel averaging
spellingShingle Heleen Gastmans
Erwin Dreesen
Sebastian G. Wicha
Nada Dia
Ellen Spreuwers
Annabel Dompas
Karel Allegaert
Stefanie Desmet
Katrien Lagrou
Willy E. Peetermans
Yves Debaveye
Isabel Spriet
Matthias Gijsen
Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
Pharmaceutics
vancomycin
therapeutic drug monitoring
population pharmacokinetics
precision dosing
predictive performance
model averaging
title Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
title_full Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
title_fullStr Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
title_short Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults
title_sort systematic comparison of hospital wide standard and model based therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin in adults
topic vancomycin
therapeutic drug monitoring
population pharmacokinetics
precision dosing
predictive performance
model averaging
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4923/14/7/1459
work_keys_str_mv AT heleengastmans systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT erwindreesen systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT sebastiangwicha systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT nadadia systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT ellenspreuwers systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT annabeldompas systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT karelallegaert systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT stefaniedesmet systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT katrienlagrou systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT willyepeetermans systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT yvesdebaveye systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT isabelspriet systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults
AT matthiasgijsen systematiccomparisonofhospitalwidestandardandmodelbasedtherapeuticdrugmonitoringofvancomycininadults