Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur

Background: Problem Based Learning (PBL), a form of active learning model that is constructive, independent, collaborative and contextual, implemented in the learning process in the form of tutorial discussions. The quality of tutorial discussion need to be improved. One way to improve the quality o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fuad Khadafianto, Gandes Retno Rahayu, Efrayim Suryadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia 2016-07-01
Series:Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpki/article/view/25321
_version_ 1811282426989641728
author Fuad Khadafianto
Gandes Retno Rahayu
Efrayim Suryadi
author_facet Fuad Khadafianto
Gandes Retno Rahayu
Efrayim Suryadi
author_sort Fuad Khadafianto
collection DOAJ
description Background: Problem Based Learning (PBL), a form of active learning model that is constructive, independent, collaborative and contextual, implemented in the learning process in the form of tutorial discussions. The quality of tutorial discussion need to be improved. One way to improve the quality of the tutorial is to revise or to select the appropriate assessment methods of tutorial discussion. Aside from tutor perception as a user, student perception about the benefits of the assessment process in PBL as subjects assessed need to be considered as a consideration in determining the appropriate model of assessment. One of tutorial discussion PBL method is using a seven jumps. This tutorial process is assessed and the result becomes a component of summative assessment. Therefore, the quality of these assessments must be guaranteed in terms of validity, reliability, impact of learning and in terms of ease of implementation. Method: This study used a qualitative method through a case study approach that use focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. This research carried out in the faculty of medicine of Islamic University of Indonesia. The study population was representative students of the years 2011-2014, the representative of tutors, and the leadership of the study program and faculty. Results: there were eight categories of perception in the tutorial discussion assessment. The perceptions included the perception of tutor and student knowledge about the assessment tutorials, the conformity tutorial discussion assessment with the concept of PBL, the technical assessment, the deviation judgment, the assessment objectivity, the assessment impact of the tutorial process, the learning/educational impact of tutorials assessment, and the recommendation of tutorial assessment Conclusion: Based on eight categories of perception in the tutorial discussion assessment, this study recommended three things, recommendation to keep doing the assessment of tutorial, to improve the objectivity of ratings tutorial by improving various components related to the assessment of tutorials, and to prevent the occurrence of irregularities in tutorial assessment.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:52:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-0563193fad05494897b579005482d5aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2252-5084
2654-5810
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:52:25Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Asosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia
record_format Article
series Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia
spelling doaj.art-0563193fad05494897b579005482d5aa2022-12-22T03:07:51ZengAsosiasi Institusi Pendidikan Kedokteran IndonesiaJurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia2252-50842654-58102016-07-015210111310.22146/jpki.2532116703Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta LiteraturFuad Khadafianto0Gandes Retno Rahayu1Efrayim Suryadi2Medical Education Unit, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam IndonesiaMedical Education Unit, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam IndonesiaMedical Education Unit, Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Islam IndonesiaBackground: Problem Based Learning (PBL), a form of active learning model that is constructive, independent, collaborative and contextual, implemented in the learning process in the form of tutorial discussions. The quality of tutorial discussion need to be improved. One way to improve the quality of the tutorial is to revise or to select the appropriate assessment methods of tutorial discussion. Aside from tutor perception as a user, student perception about the benefits of the assessment process in PBL as subjects assessed need to be considered as a consideration in determining the appropriate model of assessment. One of tutorial discussion PBL method is using a seven jumps. This tutorial process is assessed and the result becomes a component of summative assessment. Therefore, the quality of these assessments must be guaranteed in terms of validity, reliability, impact of learning and in terms of ease of implementation. Method: This study used a qualitative method through a case study approach that use focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. This research carried out in the faculty of medicine of Islamic University of Indonesia. The study population was representative students of the years 2011-2014, the representative of tutors, and the leadership of the study program and faculty. Results: there were eight categories of perception in the tutorial discussion assessment. The perceptions included the perception of tutor and student knowledge about the assessment tutorials, the conformity tutorial discussion assessment with the concept of PBL, the technical assessment, the deviation judgment, the assessment objectivity, the assessment impact of the tutorial process, the learning/educational impact of tutorials assessment, and the recommendation of tutorial assessment Conclusion: Based on eight categories of perception in the tutorial discussion assessment, this study recommended three things, recommendation to keep doing the assessment of tutorial, to improve the objectivity of ratings tutorial by improving various components related to the assessment of tutorials, and to prevent the occurrence of irregularities in tutorial assessment.https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpki/article/view/25321problem based learning, tutorials assessment, tutor perception, student perception
spellingShingle Fuad Khadafianto
Gandes Retno Rahayu
Efrayim Suryadi
Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Indonesia
problem based learning, tutorials assessment, tutor perception, student perception
title Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
title_full Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
title_fullStr Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
title_full_unstemmed Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
title_short Rancangan Perbaikan Penilaian Tutorial Berdasarkan Sudut Pandang Tutor dan Mahasiswa serta Literatur
title_sort rancangan perbaikan penilaian tutorial berdasarkan sudut pandang tutor dan mahasiswa serta literatur
topic problem based learning, tutorials assessment, tutor perception, student perception
url https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpki/article/view/25321
work_keys_str_mv AT fuadkhadafianto rancanganperbaikanpenilaiantutorialberdasarkansudutpandangtutordanmahasiswasertaliteratur
AT gandesretnorahayu rancanganperbaikanpenilaiantutorialberdasarkansudutpandangtutordanmahasiswasertaliteratur
AT efrayimsuryadi rancanganperbaikanpenilaiantutorialberdasarkansudutpandangtutordanmahasiswasertaliteratur